Abstract
Although risk is a fact of life, it was not extensively discussed in moral philosophy before the 1970s. Robert Nozick’s classic discussion of risk drew philosophical attention to the special problems created by actions that create risk but which may or may not result in any harm. This chapter begins with a description and analysis of Nozick’s argument. It concludes that familiar concepts in moral philosophy like harm, compensation, and individual moral rights cannot by themselves give a satisfactory analysis of the unique ethical problems created by activities that impose or attempt to regulate risk. This discussion leads to further examination of the relation between risk and consent. Appeals to consent are important in the justification of techniques of risk analysis used to reveal individual preferences for comparing risks, costs, and benefits in policy decisions. This discussion is followed by a review of issues involving justice and the distribution of risk. It focuses especially on some distributional issues that are unique to risk and reveal important differences between looking at the ethical dimensions of risk from an individual and from a societal perspective. The chapter concludes with some speculative remarks about future research into the ethics of risk that is prompted by increased awareness of risks imposed by new technologies, the prospect of reducing or mitigating the effects of anthropogenic climate change, and the increasingly likely prospect that decisions today may impose significant risks on future generations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Broome J (1982) Equity in risk bearing. Oper Res 30:412–414
Broome J (2008) The ethics of climate change. Scientific American, June 2008, pp 97–102
Broome J (2011) The morality of climate change. WW Norton, New York
Coase RM (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44
Cranor C (1997) A philosophy of risk assessment and the law: a case study of the role of philosophy in public policy. Philos Stud 85:135–162
Gillroy J (2000) Justice and nature: Kantian philosophy, environmental policy, and the law. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
Hansson SO (1993) The false promises of risk analysis. Ratio 6:16–26
Hansson SO (2003) Ethical criteria for risk acceptance. Erkenntnis 59:291–309
Hansson SO (2007a) Philosophical problems in cost-benefit analysis. Econ Philos 23:163–183
Hansson SO (2007b) Risk and ethics: three approaches. In: Lewens T (ed) Risk: philosophical perspectives. Routledge, London
Hausman D, McPherson M (2009) Preference satisfaction and welfare economics. Econ Philos 25:1–25
Hobbes T (1660/1996) Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kahneman D, Ritov I, Schkade D (1999) Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. J Risk Uncertainty 19:203–235
Keeney R (1980) Equity and public risk. Oper Res 28:527–534
Kelman S (1981) Cost-benefit analysis: an ethical critique. Regulation 5:33–40
MacLean D (1983) A moral requirement for energy policies. In: MacLean D, Brown P (eds) Energy and the future. Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa, pp 17–30
MacLean D (1986a) Risk and consent: philosophical issues for centralized decisions. In: MacLean D (ed) Values at risk. Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa, pp 17–30
MacLean D (1986b) Social values and the distribution of risk. In: MacLean D (ed) Values at risk. Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa, pp 75–93
MacLean D (2009) Ethics, reasons and risk analysis. In: Roeser S, Asveld L (eds) The ethics of technological risk. Earthscan, London, pp 115–127
Marglin S (1963) The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment. Q J Econ 77:95–111
Mill JS (1859/1978) On liberty. Hackett, Indianapolis
Mishan EJ (1971) Evaluation of life and limb: a theoretical approach. J Polit Econ 79:687–705
Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, and Utopia. Basic Books, New York
Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Perry S (2001) Risk, harm, and responsibility. In: Owens D (ed) Philosophical foundations of tort law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Roeser S, Asvelt L (eds) (2009) The ethics of technological risk. Earthscan, London/Sterling
Sagoff M (2004) Price, principle, and the environment. Cambridge University Press, New York
Schelling T (1968/1984) The life you save may be your own. In: Chase S (ed) Problems in public expenditure analysis, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC; reprinted in Schelling T, Choice and consequence: Perspectives of an errant economist, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
Shrader-Frechette K (1980) Nuclear power and public policy: the social and ethical problems of fisson technology. D. Reidel, Dordrecht
Shrader-Frechette K (1990) Ethics and risk-benefit analysis. Ethical and policy issues perspectives 9:6–7
Sidgwick H (1904) The elements of politics, ch. 9, sec. 2. Macmillan, London
Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1979) Rating the risks. Environment 21(14–20):36–39
Sunstein C (2002) Risk and reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sunstein C (2005) Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University Press, New York
UNEP (1992) Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm. Viewed 12 June 2011
Viscusi WK (1992) Fatal tradeoffs: public and private responsibilities for risk. Oxford University Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
MacLean, D. (2012). Ethics and Risk. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1432-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1433-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law