Abstract
Tsunamis, volcanic ash clouds, financial crashes, and oil blowouts are recent disasters that have caught us by surprise and dominated world headlines. It seems that we are just not very good at predicting such risks or dealing with their consequences. This chapter looks at one reason this might be so – that we are not measuring risk appropriately, either in how we assess a risk or how we then make decisions about risk-related problems. Our measurements are conditioned by expectations of precision and simplicity which, we will argue, are too often lacking in the real world.
In assessing a risk we can miss potential outcomes, especially when a system changes over time. We can treat our theories as true irrespective of empirical support, and we can set impractical thresholds of acceptable risk. When we do measure the risk, we may not have enough data of sufficient quality, or behavioral responses may reduce the measured risk yet increase risk that is not measured. In short, our current assessments of risk are too blinkered.
The associated blunders in decision-making are also all too familiar – disregarding a risk because the model says the chance of the event occurring is low even though we have little confidence in the model; conversely, taking an unduly “precautionary” approach to avoid risks when the potential for harm is negligible; worst of all, perhaps, missing the wider decision-making context needed for a sound judgment.
Put together, these factors mean that simple measures of risk can be a poor guide for decision-makers. This chapter advocates five extensions to current methods in order to avoid these pitfalls in the future. In risk assessment, we need to:
-
1.
Estimate unknown unknown risk
-
2.
Quantify model risk
-
3.
Use multiple measures and thresholds; and in decision support
-
4.
Balance risk and reward; and
-
5.
Examine ROB (Risk Outside the Box)
We will describe examples where, had certain measures of risk been in place, disasters might have been averted. We will then show how each of the extended methods may be applied. Two particular applications of the proposed approach will be provided – “RAG” statuses in project and risk management, and Solvency II in the insurance industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams J (1995) Risk. UCL Press, London
AIR (2003) Secondary uncertainty in AIR models 24 July 2003. Technical Note, Applied Insurance Research, Boston
Alfred R (2010) June 22, 1783: Icelandic volcano disrupts Europe’s economy http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2010/06/0621laki-iceland-volcano-ash-chokes-europe/
Atkinson D, Peijnenburg J (2006) Probability without certainty? Foundationalism Lewis Reichenbach debate. Stud Hist Philos Sci 37:442–453
Basel II (2010) http://www.basel-ii-accord.com/Basel_ii_644_to_682_Operational_Risk.htm
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London
Bedford T, Cooke J (2001) Probabilistic risk analysis. Cambridge University Press, see the reference quoted therein – Versteeg M (1977) Estimating common cause failure probabilities in reliability and risk analyses. J Hazard Mater 17:215–221
Beinhocker ED (2006) Complex systems and the origin of wealth. Random House Business, London
Bernstein PL (1996) The remarkable story of risk. Wiley, New York
Cooke Y (2010) Yvonne Cooke’s article in The Independent on 6th July 2010
Cruz M (ed) (2009) The Solvency II handbook. Risk Books, London
Economist (2010) The Economist, May 2010
Einhorn (2008) Private profits and socialized risk, GARP Risk Review (June/July 2008)
Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75:643–669
Gould S (1985) The mismeasure of man. Penguin, New York
Gregoriou GN, Hoppe C, Wehn CS (eds) (2010) The risk modelling evaluation handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York
Grossman PZ, Cearley RW, Cole DH (2006) Insurance, and the learned hand formula. Law Probability Risk 5(1):1–18
Hubbard D (2009) The failure of risk management: why it’s broken and how to fix it. Wiley, New York
Hume D (1748) Enquiry concerning the principles of human understanding. Oxford Univerasity Press, Oxford
JSB (2010) JSB guidelines for the assessment of general damages in personal injury cases. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27
Kendrick M (2008) The great cholesterol con. John Blake, London
Keynes JM (1937) The general theory of employment. Q J Econ 51(1):209–223
Knight FH (1921) Risk uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Lanchester J (2010) Whoops!: why everyone owes everyone and no one can pay. Allen Lane, London
Maudsley H (1867) The physiology and pathology of the mind (BiblioBazaar, LLC 2009)
Montross F (2010) Model mania, GenRe pamphlet
Noble D (2008) The music of life: biology beyond genes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Oxford Economics (2010) The economic impact of air travel restrictions, Oxford Economics. http://www.oxfordeconomics.com/free/pdfs/oeaviationweb10.pdf
Pilkey O, Pilkey-Jones L (2006) Useless arithmetic. Columbia University Press, Columbia
POST (2009) The dual-use dilemma, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, Number 340, London
RMS (2001) RMS Secondary uncertainty methodology. Risk Management Solutions, California
RMS (2010) Managing terrorism risk. Risk Management Solutions, California
Rumsfeld D (2002) DoD news briefing – secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers 12 Feb 2002, http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=2636
Salmon F (2009) Recipe for disaster: the formula that killed wall street, Wired Magazine 17.03. http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant?currentPage=4
Schrödinger E (1935) The present situation in quantum mechanics. In: Wheeler JA and Zurek WH (1983) Quantum theory and measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p. 137
Shackle GLS (1961) Decision, order and time in human affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Shipley (2009) Probably wrong – misapplications of probability and statistics to real-life uncertainty, presentations given by Taylor P and Shipley D at Oxford in 2008 and 2009.
Smith L (2010) Uncertainty, ambiguity and risk in forming climate policy, handling uncertainty in science, royal society (Audio recording http://royalsociety.org/2010-Handling-uncertainty-in-science/)
Society R (1992) Risk: analysis perception and management. Royal Society, London
Solvency II (2010) http://www.fsa.gov.uk/Pages/About/What/International/solvency/index.shtml
Taleb NN (2006) Fooled by randomness. Penguin, New York
Taleb NN (2007) The black swan. Random House, New York
Tett G (2009) Fool’s gold: how unrestrained greed corrupted a dream, shattered global markets and unleashed a catastrophe. Little Brown, London
The Stationery Office (2007) Compensation for injury and death (Ogden tables) (ISBN 9-78-011560125-5). http://www.gad.gov.uk/services/other%20services/compensation_for_injury_and_death.html
Turner (2009) Turner Report, FSA. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/turner_review.pdf
Wack P (1985) Scenarios: shooting the rapids. Harvard Business Rev 63(6):139–150
Wilde GJS (1994) Target risk – dealing with the danger of death, disease and damage in everyday decisions. PDE, Toronto
Woo G (2004) Understanding terrorism risk, The Risk Report Jan 2004
Acknowledgments
The “Risk” section was adapted from “What is Risk?” (unpublished) by Rafaela Hillerband and Peter Taylor developed for the Risk Seminar Series at the James Martin School in Hilary Term 2008. I would also like to thank Rafaela for her editorial comments on the manuscript.
My thanks to David Shipley for the Terrorism Risk illustration, to Milan Vukelic and Andrew Baddeley for discussions on the use of reverse stress tests in insurance, to Professor Aurora Plomer for introducing me to Denis Noble’s “Music of Life” and the “Hand Formula,” and Chris Taylor, Milan Vukelic, David Shipley, Henry Ashton, Ben Matharu, and John Thirlwell for kindly commenting on drafts of the paper. Most of all, though, to Ian Nicol for his careful reading, questioning, and suggestions of re-expression for which the reader can be most grateful!
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Taylor, P. (2012). The Mismeasure of Risk. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1432-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1433-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law