Skip to main content

Food, Agriculture, and Trade Organizations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 369 Accesses

Synonyms

Trade associations; Trade institutions; Trade groups

Introduction

Trade organizations establish and enforce the rules of trade. The exemplary example of such an organization is the World Trade Organization (WTO). Established in 1995, the WTO marked the first time that an international organization had the legal mandate to regulate trade between nations, a role previously under the purview of individual nations. The objective of the WTO is to replace national trade rules, such as tariffs and quotas, and prohibit nontariff trade barriers, such as technical barriers or rules of origin, with a single institutional framework designed to allow trade to flow “as smoothly, predictably, and freely as possible” (World Trade Organization 2013). Changes wrought by the WTO led to the deepening of market relations globally, including the expansion of global value chains (GVC), where production is integrated from start to finish (Busch and Bain 2004; Bair 2009). Here, large-scale...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailis, R., & Baka, J. (2011). Constructing sustainable biofuels: Governance of the emerging biofuel economy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(4), 827–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, C. (2010a). Governing the global value chain: GLOBALGAP and the Chilean fresh fruit industry. International Journal of Food and Agriculture, 17(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, C. (2010b). Structuring the flexible and feminized labor market: GlobalGAP standards for agricultural labor in Chile. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(2), 335–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, C., & Hatanaka, M. (2010). The practice of third-party certification: Enhancing environmental sustainability and social justice in the global south? In V. Higgins & W. Larner (Eds.), Calculating the social: Standards and the reconfiguration of governing (pp. 56–74). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, C., Ransom, E., & Worosz, M. (2010). Constructing credibility: Using technoscience to legitimate strategies in agrifood governance. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 25(3), 160–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J. (2009). Global commodity chains: Genealogy and review. In J. Bair (Ed.), Frontiers of commodity chain research (pp. 1–34). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, S., & Dolan, C. (2006). Ethical sourcing in the global food system. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendell, J. (2005). In whose name? The accountability of corporate social responsibility. Development in Practice, 15(3&4), 362–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & George, F. J. (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2011). Standards: Recipes for reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L., & Bain, C. (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 321–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H., & Le Heron, R. (2007). Supermarkets, producers and audit technologies: The constitutive micro-politics of food, legitimacy and governance. In D. Burch & G. Lawrence (Eds.), Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods (pp. 131–153). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H., Lawrence, G., & Smith, K. (2006). Audit cultures and the antipodes: The implications of EurepGAP for New Zealand and Australian agri-food industries. In J. Murdoch & T. Marsden (Eds.), Between the local and the global: Confronting complexity in the contemporary agri-food sector (pp. 69–94). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyns, E. (2011). Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture: Limits of the ‘inclusiveness’ paradigm. In S. Ponte, P. Gibbon, & J. Vestergarrd (Eds.), Governing through standards. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyns, E., & Riisgaard, L. (forthcoming). Introduction to symposium: The exercise of power through Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives for sustainable agriculture and its inclusion and exclusion outcomes. Agriculture and Human Values.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J., & Fuchs, D. (2009). Agrifood corporations, global governance, and sustainability: A framework for analysis. In J. Clapp & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Corporate power in global agrifood governance (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djama, M., Fouilleux, E., & Vagneron, I. (2011). Standard setting, certifying and benchmarking: A governmentality approach to sustainability standards in the agro-food sector. In S. Ponte, P. Gibbon, & J. Vestergaard (Eds.), Governing through Standards (pp. 184–209). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, T., & Vorley, B. (2006). Small producers: Constraints and challenges in the global food system. In S. Barrientos & C. Dolan (Eds.), Ethical sourcing in the global food system (pp. 163–177). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. (2005). The global economy: Organization, governance, and development. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 160–182). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Korzeniewicz, M., & Korzeniewicz, R. (1994). Commodity chains and global capital. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • German, L., Schoneveld, G., & Pacheco, P. (2011). Local social and environmental impacts of biofuels: Global comparative assessment and implications for governance. Ecology and Society, 16(4). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/article.php/4516

  • Gibbon, P., & Ponte, S. (2008). Global value chains: From governance to governmentality? Economy and Society, 37(3), 365–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLOBALG.A.P, Coop, & GTZ. (2007). The GRASP project report: Towards good social practices in agriculture (pp. 1–24). Switzerland: GLOBALG.A.P.; Coop, GTZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2009). Unveiling the unveiling. Commodity chains, commodity fetishism, and the “value” of voluntary, ethical food labels. In J. Bair (Ed.), Frontiers of commodity chain research (pp. 190–206). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., & Busch, L. (2005). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30, 354–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., & Larner, W. (2010). Standards and standardization as a social scientific problem. In V. Higgins & W. Larner (Eds.), Calculating the social: Standards and the reconfiguration of governing (pp. 1–17). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., & Lawrence, G. (2005). Introduction: Globalization and agricultural governance. In V. Higgins & G. Lawrence (Eds.), Agricultural governance: Globalization and the new politics of regulation (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Trade Centre. (2013). GLOBALG.A.P. Standards map. Retrieved 17 Mar 2014. http://search.standardsmap.org/assets/media/GLOBALG.A.P./English/AtAGlance_EN.pdf

  • Klooster, D. (2011). The local instrumentality of global standards: How Mexican indigenous communities use FSC Certification to foster a furniture production network. In S. Ponte, P. Gibbon, & J. Vestergaard (Eds.), Governing through standards (pp. 266–288). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konefal, J., & Hatanaka, M. (2011). Enacting third-party certification: A case study of science and politics in organic shrimp certification. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konefal, J., Bain, C., Mascarenhas, M., & Busch, L. (2007). Supermarkets and supply chains in North America. In D. Burch & G. Lawrence (Eds.), Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods (pp. 268–291). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G., & Burch, D. (2007). Understanding supermarkets and agri-food supply chains. In D. Burch & G. Lawrence (Eds.), Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods (pp. 1–26). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, L. (2013). EU criteria for sustainable biofuels: Accounting for carbon, depoliticising plunder. Geoforum, 44, 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, D. (2003). The paradox of wealth and poverty. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, D. (2005). Market movements. Nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partzsch, L. (2011). The legitimacy of biofuel certification. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S. (2008). Greener than thou: The political economy of fish ecolabeling and its local manifestations in South Africa. World Development, 36(1), 159–175. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S., & Cheyns, E. (2013). Voluntary standards, expert knowledge and the governance of sustainability networks. Global Networks, 13(4), 459–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S., & Gibbon, P. (2005). Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains. Economy and Society, 34(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S., Gibbon, P. & Verstergaard, J. 2011. Conclusion: The Current Status, Limits and Future of ‘Governing through Standards’. In S. Ponte, P. Gibbon & J. Vestergaard (EDs.), Governing through Standards (pp. 289–304). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-Carrón, M., & Larner, W. (2010). Gendering codes of conduct: Chiquita bananas and Nicaraguan women workers. In V. Higgins & W. Larner (Eds.), Calculating the social: Standards and the reconfiguration of governing (pp. 38–55). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, E. (2007). The rise of agricultural animal welfare standards as understood through a neo-institutional lens. International Journal of Food and Agriculture, 15(3), 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2003). Taking embedded liberalism global: The corporate connection. In D. Held & M. Koenig-Achibugi (Eds.), Taming globalization: Frontiers of governance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, G., & Glasbergen, P. (2011). Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1891–1899. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfa, T., Bain, C., & Moreno, R. (forthcoming). Depoliticizing land and water “grabs” in Colombia? The limits of Bonsucro certification for enhancing sustainable biofuel practices. Agriculture and Human Values.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Castaneda, L. (2012). A forest of evidence: Third-party certification and multiple forms of proof – A case study of oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values, 29(3), 361–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Mahutga, M. (2009). Trading up the commodity chain? The impact of extractive and labor-intensive manufacturing trade on world-system inequalities. In J. Bair (Ed.), Frontiers of commodity chain research (pp. 63–82). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallontire, A., & Vorley, B. (2005). Achieving fairness in trading between supermarkets and their agrifood supply chains (pp. 1–27). London: UK Food Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallontire, A., Opondo, M., Nelson, V., & Martin, A. (2011). Beyond the vertical? Using value chains and governance as a framework to analyse private standards initiatives in agri-food chains. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 427–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P. (2005). Corporate responsibility and the movement of business. Development in Practice, 15(3 & 4), 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorley, B. (2007). Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains in Europe: Partnership and protest. In D. Burch & G. Lawrence (Eds.), Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods (pp. 1–26). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2013). What is the World Trade Organization? Retrieved October 7, 2013, from http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact1_e.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Bain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bain, C. (2014). Food, Agriculture, and Trade Organizations. In: Thompson, P.B., Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_181

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_181

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0928-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0929-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics