Synonyms
Agricultural research; Conservation agriculture; Contested agronomy; Political ecology; System of rice intensification
Introduction
Agronomy, in the Anglophone tradition, is usually understood as the application to crop production of knowledge and technology developed from the plant and soil sciences. Through both formal and informal research and practice, new agronomic knowledge and technology are created that can be used to address “technical” problems within existing production systems, develop new systems, and/or to further specific social, political, economic, technical, and/or commercial objectives. Any aspect of this process may be contested, from the identification of a problem or the configuration and performance of a new technology or system through to the vision (implicit or explicit) of a desirable future world that underpins it. With politics understood broadly as social relations involving authority or power, the term political agronomyrefers to the study of...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson, J. A., & Giller, K. E. (2012). On heretics and god’s blanket salesmen: contested claims for conservation agriculture and the politics of its promotion in African smallholder farming. In J. Sumberg & J. Thompson (Eds.), Contested agronomy: Agricultural research in a changing world. London: Routledge.
Bruce, T. J. A. (2012). GM as a route for delivery of sustainable crop protection. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(2), 537–541. doi:10.1093/jxb/err281.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Research, 114(1), 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017.
Glover, D. (2010). The corporate shaping of GM crops as a technology for the poor. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 67–90. doi:10.1080/03066150903498754.
Glover, D. (2011). The system of rice intensification: Time for an empirical turn. Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 57(3–4), 217–224. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2010.11.006.
Harwood, J. (2013). Global visions vs. local complexity: experts wrestle with the problem of development. In F. Bray, D. Schafer, & E. Fields-Black (Eds.), Global rice: Promiscuity, knowledge, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hightower, J. (1972). Hard tomatoes, hard tomatoes: Failure of land grant college complex. Society, 10(1), 10–22. doi:10.1007/bf02695245.
Kassam, A., & Brammer, H. (2012). Combining sustainable agricultural production with economic and environmental benefits. The Geographical Journal, no-no. 179(11), 11–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00465.x
Orr, A. (2012). Why were so many social scientists wrong about the Green Revolution? Learning from Bangladesh. The Journal of Development Studies, 48(11), 1565–1586. doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.663905.
Robbins, P. (2011). Political ecology: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sismondo, S. (2012). An introduction to science and technology studies (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stoop, W. A., Uphoff, N., & Kassam, A. (2002). A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: Opportunities for improving farming systems for resource-poor farmers. Agricultural Systems, 71(3), 249–274. doi:10.1016/s0308-521x(01)00070-1.
Sumberg, J., Irving, R., Adams, E., & Thompson, J. (2012a). Success making and success stories: Agronomic research in the spotlight. In J. Sumberg & J. Thompson (Eds.), Contested agronomy: Agricultural research in a changing world. London: Routledge.
Sumberg, J., Thompson, J., & Woodhouse, P. (2012b). Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious. Agriculture and Human Values, 30(1), 71–83. doi:10.1007/s10460-012-9376-8.
Woodhouse, P. (2010). Beyond industrial agriculture? Some questions about farm size, productivity and sustainability. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), 437–453.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sumberg, J., Thompson, J., Woodhouse, P. (2014). Political Agronomy. In: Thompson, P.B., Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_143
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_143
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0928-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0929-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law