Skip to main content

Synonyms

Population intensity; Urban compactness; Urban concentration

Definition

Urban density is a concept used in city planning, urban studies, and related fields to describe the intensity of people, jobs, housing units, total floor area of buildings, or some other measure of human occupation, activity, and development across a defined unit of area. In general terms, urban density describes the degree of concentration or compactness of people or development in a city.

Description

The density of cities is relevant to a broad range of issues related to the quality of urban life including “environmental quality, transportation systems, physical infrastructure and urban form, social factors, and economic factors” (Churchman, 1999, p. 398). As such, urban density is a major preoccupation of urban planning. Modern zoningsystems developed in the early twentieth century were partly intended to limit congestion, the shadowing of streets, and other adverse effects of very dense buildings and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anthony, J. (2004). Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl? Urban Affairs Review, 39(3), 376–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badoe, D. A., & Miller, E. J. (2000). Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 5(4), 235–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud, A., & Richardson, H. W. (2004). Transit and density: Atlanta, the United States and Western Europe. In H. W. Richardson & C. Bae (Eds.), Urban sprawl in Western Europe and the United States. Aldershot/Hants/Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, L. (1996). Reurbanization, uneven urban development, and the debate on new urban forms. Urban Geography, 17(8), 690–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, A. (1999). Disentangling the concept of density. Journal of Planning Literature, 13(4), 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. S., Nelson A. C., & Dueker, K. J. (1994). The new burbs: The exurbs and their implications for planning policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1), 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R. (1994). Interpreting the apartment house: Modernity and metropolitanism in Toronto, 1900–1930. Journal of Historical Geography, 20(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (2008). Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature review. In J. M. Marzluff (Ed.), Urban ecology: An international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S., Baldassare, M., & Ofshe, R. J. (1975). Crowding studies and urban life: A critical review. Journal of the American Planning Association, 41(6), 406–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, R. (1998). The metropolitan dimension of early zoning: Revisiting the 1916 New York City ordinance. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), 170–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A. (2003). Measuring density: Working definitions for residential density and building intensity. Minneapolis, MN: Design Center for American Urban Landscape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. (1997). Are compact cities a desirable planning goal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, A., Kabisch, S., Steinfuhrer, A., Bouzarovski, S., Hall, R., & Ogden, P. (2010). Emergent spaces of reurbanisation: Exploring the demographic dimension of inner-city residential change in a European setting. Population, Space and Place, 16, 443–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., & Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, P., Sorensen, A., & Parizeau, K. (2007). Urban density in the greater golden horseshoe. Toronto: Cities Centre, University of Toronto, Research Paper. http://www.citiescentre.utoronto.ca/publications/Research_Papers.htm. Accessed June 2011.

  • Ingram, G. K., Carbonnel, A., Hong, Y., & Flint, A. (2009). Smart growth policies: An evaluation of programs and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. (2006). Zoned out: Regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land-use. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. (1989). Econometric studies of urban population density: A survey. Journal of Urban Economics, 26, 361–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, M. (2005). The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S., & Taylor, P. (1981). The modifiable areal unit problem. In N. Wrigley & R. Bennett (Eds.), Quantitative geography: A British view (pp. 60–69). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, M., Matheau-Police, A., & Couty, C. (2007). Development of a scale of perceived environmental annoyances in urban settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., & Woodcock, C. E. (2008). Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Studies, 45(3), 659–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). What affects commute mode choice: Neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, 13, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, T., Curran, W., & Lees, L. (2004). Gentrification research: New directions and critical scholarship. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1141–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. E. (1997). A review of monocentric urban density analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 12(2), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukkoo, K. (2007). Changes in the nature of urban spatial structure in the United States, 1890–2000. Journal of Regional Science, 47(2), 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Hess .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hess, P. (2014). Density, Urban. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_698

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics