Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

2014 Edition
| Editors: Alex C. Michalos

Gender Inequality and Subjective Well-Being

  • M. S. Laure RuthEmail author
  • Jaime Napier
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_4144

Synonyms

Definition

Complementary Stereotyping: People generally make a distinction between agency and communality (Rosenberg, Nelson, & Vivekananthan, 1968). Gender stereotypes reflect this distinction such that men are stereotyped as being agentic but not communal, and women are stereotyped as being communal but not agentic. Because each group is considered to possess a set of strengths and weaknesses that balance those of the other group, these stereotypes are considered complementary.

Hostile Sexism: Antagonistic views toward women. Generally casts women as wanting to control men but not being as competent or able to serve in positions of power.

Benevolent Sexism: Chivalrous views toward women. Generally casts women as being more social, communal, and moral than men but undercuts women’s advancement in society because it also casts women as being weaker than men and in need of men’s protection.

Ambi...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1970). Case study of a nonconscious ideology: Training the woman to know her place. In D. J. Bem (Ed.), Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs (pp. 89–99). Belmont: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  2. Diender, E., & Tov, W. (2007). Subjective well-being and peace. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 421–440.Google Scholar
  3. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  4. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754.Google Scholar
  5. Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the division of labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1272–1286.Google Scholar
  6. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.Google Scholar
  7. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.Google Scholar
  8. International Labor Organization. (2011). Gender inequality and women in the U.S. Labor Force. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/washington/areas/gender-equality-in-the-workplace/WCMS_159496/lang--en/index.htm
  9. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1–27.Google Scholar
  10. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.Google Scholar
  11. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.Google Scholar
  12. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.Google Scholar
  13. Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2010). The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 62, 405–419.Google Scholar
  14. Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294.Google Scholar
  15. United Nations Development Programme. (2000). Human Development Report 2000. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wakslack, C., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274.Google Scholar
  17. World Values Survey. (2006). European and world values surveys four-wave integrated data file, 1981–2004. V.20060423. Retrieved from http://www.jdsurvey.net/bdasepjds/wvsevs/WVSData.jsp

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA