Definition
As other theoretical concepts that point to not directly observable social phenomena, the term “national identity” is marked by conceptual ambiguity. Depending on theoretical tradition, discipline, or field of research and methodological taste, “national identity” might be discussed on the level of individuals, collective actors (political or cultural elites), or enclosed political entities (states or nations), and therefore differently defined and operationalized.
The theoretical grounding of the following definition of “national identity” is based on social identity theory (Tajfel, 1978, 1981; Tajfel & Turner, 1979), self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987), and some further developments in political psychology...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (2009). Identity as a variable. In R. Abdelal, Y. M. Herrera, A. I. Johnston, & R. McDermott (Eds.), Measuring identity. A guide for social scientists (pp. 17–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Adams, L. L. (2009). Techniques for measuring identity in ethnographic research. In R. Abdelal, Y. M. Herrera, A. I. Johnston, & R. McDermott (Eds.), Measuring identity. A guide for social scientists (pp. 316–341). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London/New York: Verso.
Bar-Tal, D., & Staub, E. (Eds.). (1997). Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
Barth, F. (Ed.). (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. The social organisation of culture difference. Bergen: Universitatsforlaget.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority group relations. New York: Wiley.
Blank, T., Schmidt, P., & Westle, B. (2001, April). “Patriotism” – A contradiction, a possibility or an empirical reality? Paper presented at ECPR Workshops 26: National Identity in Europe, Grenoble, France.
Blank, T., & Schmidt, P. (1997). Konstruktiver patriotismus im vereinigten Deutschland? Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen studie. In A. Mummendey & B. Simon (Eds.), Identität und verschiedenheit. Zur sozialpsychologie der identität in komplexen gesellschaften (pp. 127–148). Bern/Göttingen/Toronto/Seattle: Hans Huber.
Blank, T., & Schmidt, P. (2003). National identity in a united Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology, 24, 289–312.
Brubaker, R., Loveman, M., & Stamatov, P. (2004). Ethnicity as cognition. Theory and Society, 33, 31–64.
Citrin, J., & Sears, D. O. (2009). Balancing national and ethnic identities. The psychology of E pluribus Unum. In R. Abdelal, Y. M. Herrera, A. I. Johnston, & R. McDermott (Eds.), Measuring identity. A guide for social scientists (pp. 145–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohrs, J. C. (2004). Ist patriotischer nationalstolz wünschenswert? Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 35, 201–215.
Cohrs, J. C. (2005). Patriotismus – Sozialpsychologische aspekte. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 36, 3–11.
Davidov, E. (2009). Measurement equivalence of nationalism and constructive patriotism in the ISSP: 34 countries in a comparative perspective. Political Analysis, 17, 64–82.
Davidov, E. (2011). Nationalism and constructive patriotism: A longitudinal test of comparability in 22 countries with the ISSP. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 88–103.
Delanty, G., & Rumford, C. (2005). Rethinking Europe. Social theory and the implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und geltung. Beiträge zur diskurstheorie des rechts und des demokratischen rechtsstaats. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
Herrmann, R. K., & Brewer, M. B. (2004). Why study identity and institutions? In R. K. Herrmann, T. Risse, & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Transnational identities. Becoming European in the EU (pp. 1–22). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity. A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127–156.
Huddy, L., & Khatib, N. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 63–77.
Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–273.
Kovács, A., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2003). NATO, neutrality and national identity. The case of Austria and Hungary. Wien: Böhlau.
Latcheva, R. (2011). Cognitive interviewing and factor-analytic techniques. A mixed method approach to validity of survey items measuring national identity. Quality and Quantity, 45, 1175–1199.
Mummendey, A., Klink, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism. National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 159–172.
Mummendey, A., & Simon, B. (Eds.). (1997). Identität und verschiedenheit. Zur sozialpsychologie der identität in komplexen gesellschaften. Bern/Göttingen/Toronto/Seattle: Hans Huber.
Reinprecht, C., & Rossalina, L. (2003). Neutrality and Austrian identity. Discourse on NATO and neutrality as reflected in public opinion. In A. Kovács & R. Wodak (Eds.), NATO, neutrality and national identity. The case of Austria and Hungary. Wien: Böhlau.
Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.
Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133.
Sinnott, R. (2006). An evaluation of the measurement of national, subnational and supranational identity in crossnational surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 211–223.
Steenkamp, J.-B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross? National consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–107.
Sylvan, D. A., & Metskas, A. K. (2009). Trade-offs in measuring identities: A comparison of five approaches. In R. Abdelal, Y. M. Herrera, A. I. Johnston, & R. McDermott (Eds.), Measuring identity. A guide for social scientists (pp. 72–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Studies in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
Tilly, C. (2005). Identities, boundaries, and social ties. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Latcheva, R. (2014). Measuring National Identity. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_4143
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_4143
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law