Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

2014 Edition
| Editors: Alex C. Michalos

Affective Connection to Nature

  • Elisabeth KalsEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3964

Synonyms

Definition

Affective connection is not derived from just one single theory, and there is not one accepted theory or definition on it. Instead, in the various models and studies on this construct, slightly different names have been used, such as emotional commitment to nature, emotional affinity toward nature, nature relatedness, or inclusion of nature in self. It is a rather broad and multifaceted construct, which has developed into a new paradigm within environmental psychology with extensive and differentiated active research on it.

Affective connection to nature can be defined as a positive emotional bond with nature which is more or less consciously experienced by the subject. It requires positive experiences with nature, whereas negative experiences, like fear of nature phenomena or disgust, will not result in the same form of connection to nature....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment. The psychology of nature (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.Google Scholar
  3. Dutcher, T. S., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Johnson, J. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 474–493.Google Scholar
  4. Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 109–120.Google Scholar
  5. Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Kellert, S. R. (Eds.). (2002). Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–151). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202.Google Scholar
  7. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507–542.Google Scholar
  9. Kellert, S. R. (1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lyons, E., & Breakwell, G. M. (1994). Factors predicting environmental concern and indifference in 13-to 16-year-olds. Environment and Behavior, 26, 223–238.Google Scholar
  11. Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.Google Scholar
  12. Müller, M., Kals, E., & Pansa, R. (2009). Adolescents´ emotional affinity towards nature: A cross-societal study. Special Issue: Children and Nature. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 59–69.Google Scholar
  13. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals` connections with nature to environmental concern and behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.Google Scholar
  14. Schmuck, P., & Schultz, P. W. (Eds.). (2002). Psychology of sustainable development. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Schultz, P. W. (2001). Assessing the structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 1–13.Google Scholar
  16. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social and Organizational PsychologyCatholic University of Eichstätt-IngolstadtEichstättGermany