Skip to main content

Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH)

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research
  • 129 Accesses

Synonyms

DASH Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm and Hand questionnaire (30-item full length version); Quick DASH, questionnaire (13-Item short version)

Definition

Introduction

The DASH is the most important and most widely used measurement instrument for self-rated outcome of the upper extremity, that is, the shoulder, elbow, and hand, that is, wrist and finger joints (Kennedy, Beaton, Solway, McConnell & Bombardier, 2011). This entry summarizes the psychometric properties of the DASH and its short form, the QuickDASH focusing on validity. Since the two most important references used are recent systematic reviews, this condensate of DASH data is also a systematic review of the current world literature (Angst, Schwyzer, Aeschlimann, Simmen & Goldhahn, 2011; Kennedy, Beaton, Solway, McConnell & Bombardier, 2011). Where necessary, single studies were individually reviewed (about 150 studies).

Validity is the most important psychometric property of a measurement tool because it proves...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angst, F., Goldhahn, J., Drerup, S., Aeschlimann, A., Schwyzer, H. K., & Simmen, B. R. (2008). Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 59(3), 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angst, F., Goldhahn, J., Drerup, S., Flury, M., Schwyzer, H. K., & Simmen, B. R. (2009). How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the quick disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand (DASH) questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joints. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1043–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angst, F., Goldhahn, J., Drerup, S., Kolling, C., Aeschlimann, A., Simmen, B. R., & Schwyzer, H. K. (2012). Responsiveness of five outcome measurement instruments in total elbow arthroplasty. Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken), 64(11), 1749–1755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angst, F., Schwyzer, H. K., Aeschlimann, A., Simmen, B. R., Goldhahn, J. (2011). Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Its Short Version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). In: Katz PP. Patient outcomes in rheumatology, 2011. A review of measures. Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken), 63(Suppl11), S174–S188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayad, F., Lefevre-Colau, M. M., Gautheron, V., Fermanian, J., Roren A. (2008). Responsiveness of the French version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (F-DASH) in patients with orthopedic and medical shoulder disorders. Joint Bone Spine, 75(5), 579–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. P. (2011). Introduction to special issue: Patient outcomes in rheumatology, 2011. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11), S1–S3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. A., Beaton, D. E., Solway, S., McConnell, S., & Bombardier, C. (2011). The DASH and QuickDASH outcome measure user’s manual (3rd Ed.). Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Work & Health. Retrieved from http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca.

  • MacDermid, J. C., Drosdowech, D., Faber, K. (2006). Responsiveness of self-reported scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery. Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery, 15(4), 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDermid, J. C., Richards, R. S., Donner, A., Bellamy, N., Roth, J. H. (2000). Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery American, 25(2), 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Reliability, validity, measuring change. In D. L. Streiner, & G. R. Norman (Eds.), Health measurement scales (4th ed.) (pp. 167–207, 247–274, 277–295). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Angst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Angst, F. (2014). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3892

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3892

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics