Skip to main content

Precautionary Principle

  • Reference work entry
  • 306 Accesses

Synonyms

PP; Precautionary approach; Vorsorgeprinzip

Definition

The precautionary principle requires that where there is the potential for serious or irreversible harm to the ecosystem or human health, anticipatory measures should be taken to prevent such harm; furthermore, uncertainty as to the likelihood or extent of the harm should not result in the postponement of cost-effective measures to avoid it.

Description

Origin

There is a general consensus that the precautionary principle arose in Germany as the Vorsorgeprinzip as early as 1970s and was expressly adopted in German law (Cameron & Abouchar, 1991). Interestingly, this occurred at a point in time when many environmental statutes around the world were first being enacted as separate pieces of legislation. Some trace the development of these environmental statutes to the publication in 1962 of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring (Richardson & Wood, 2006). The origins of the precautionary principle may have arisen even earlier in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, J. H. (2000). More sorry than safe, assessing the precautionary principle & the proposed international biosafety protocol. Texas International Law Journal, 35, 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, A. S. (2002). The taming of the precautionary principle. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 27(1), 13. http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol27/iss1/3

  • Ashford, N. A. (1999). A conceptual framework for the use of the precautionary principle in Law. In C. Raffensperger & J. Tickner (Eds.), The environment: Implementing the precautionary principle (pp. 198–206). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benevides, H., & McClenaghan, T. (2002). Implementing precaution, an NGO response to the government of Canada’s discussion document “a Canadian perspective on the precautionary approach/principle” (p. 27). www.cela.ca (Canadian Environmental Law Association Report No. 419, ISBN # 1-894158-57-1).

  • British Columbia Court of Appeal, Prowse, Ryan and Juddart JJ.A. Western Canada Wilderness Committee v. British Columbia [2003] B.C.J. No. 1581.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Columbia Supreme Court, Ross J., Wier v. British Columbia (Env. Appeal Bd.) [2003] B.C.J. No. 2221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron J., & Abouchar, J. (1991). The precautionary principle. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 14(1), 1–27. http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol14/iss1/2

  • Cameron, J., & Abouchar, J. (1996). The status of the precautionary principle in international Law. In D. Freestone & E. Hey (Eds.), The precautionary principle and international Law (pp. 29–52). Boston: Kluwer Law International Chap. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Food and Drugs Act R.S.C., 1985, c. F-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Oceans Act, S.C. 1996, c. 31, Preamble (para. 6); Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, S.C. 1999, c. 33, s. 2(1)(a); Species at Risk Act S.C. 2002, c. 29; Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, S.C. 1992, c. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Pest Control Products Act, S.C. 2002, c. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranor, F. C. (1999). Asymmetric information, the precautionary principle, and burdens of proof. In C. Raffensperger & J. Tickner (Eds.), Protecting public health & the environment: Implementing the precautionary principle (pp. 75–99). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2000). Communication from the European commission on the precautionary principle. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/00/96&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en. Accessed 2 February 2000.

  • European Environment Agency. (2001). Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 18962000. Copenhagen: Author. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_22

  • European Environment Agency. (2013). Late lessons from early warnings: Science, precaution and innovation (p. 39). Copenhagen: Author. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/late-lessons-2

  • Fed Ct. Austr., Sackville J. Friends of Hinchinbrook Society Inc. V. Minister for Environment (1997) 142 ALR 632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feintuck, M. (2005). Precautionary maybe, but what’s the principle? The precautionary principle, the regulation of risk, and the public domain. Journal of Law and Society, 30(3), 371–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E. (2001). Is the precautionary principle justiciable? Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 13(3), 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S. M. (2006). A core precautionary principle. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geistfeld, M. (2001). Reconciling cost-benefit analysis with the principle that safety matters more than money. New York University Law Review, 76, 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada. (2001). A Canadian perspective on the precautionary approach/principle: Proposed guiding principles. Ottawa: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R., & Fisher, E. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on the precautionary principle. NSW: Federation Press Leichhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • High Court Kerala, M. Sasidharan Nambiar, J., Sujatha v A. Prema et al. Indian Law Reports 2005 (3) Kerala p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honourable Commissioner Judge Dennis O`Connor. (2002). Report of the Walkerton inquiry Vol. 2, (Ontario Attorney General). http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/walkerton/part2/

  • Honourable Commissioner Judge Horace Krever. (1997). Krever inquiry, commission of inquiry on the blood system in Canada (Health Canada). http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/activit/com/krever-eng.php

  • Jordan, A., & O’Riordan, T. (1999). The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental policy and politics. In C. Raffensperger & J. Tickner (Eds.), Protecting public health and the environment – implementing the precautionary principle (pp. 15–35). New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriebel, D., Tickner, J., Epstein, P., Lemons, J., Levins, R., Loechler, E. L., et al. (2001). The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(9), 871–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land and Environment Court NSW, Stein J. Leatch v. National Parks & Wildlife Service (1993) 81 LGERA 270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land and Environment Court, NSW, Preston, CJ, Telstra v. Hornsby Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 133 (2006) 146 LGERA 10; (2006) 67 NSWLR 256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, G., Ahrens, A., & Salter-Green, E. (2000). An environmentalist’s vision of operationalizing the precautionary principle in the management of chemicals. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 6(3), 289–294. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.7814&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Mandel, G. N., & Gathii, J. T. (2006). Cost benefit analysis versus the precautionary principle: Beyond Cass Sunstein’s laws of fear. University of Illinois Law Review, 5, 1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, N. A. (2002). Formulating the precautionary principle. Environmental Ethics, 24, 263–274. http://commonsenseatheism.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Manson-Formulating-the-Precautionary-Principle.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2011.

  • Marr, S. (2000). The southern bluefin tuna cases: The precautionary approach and conservation and management of fish resources. European Journal of International Law, 11(4), 815–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mr. Justice Archie Campbell. (2006). SARS Commission, “Spring of fear”, SARS commission final report: Volume three (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care). http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/public/pub/ministry_reports/campbell06/campbell06.html

  • Ontario Court of Appeal, Feldman, Sharpe, and Gillese JJ.A., Fletcher v. Kingston (City) 2004 O.J. No. 1940; 70 O.R. (3d) 577, at para. 86 of the Judgment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffensperger, C., Schettler, T., & Myers, N. (2000). Precaution: Belief, regulatory system, and overarching principle. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 6(3), 266–269. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.7814&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Raffensperger, C., & Tickner, J. (Eds.). (1999). Protecting public health and the environment: Implementing the precautionary principle. New york: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B., & Wood, S. (2006). Environmental law for sustainability. Oxford: Hart Publishing Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society of Canada, Expert Panel on the Future of Food Biotechnology. (2001) Elements of precaution: Recommendations for the regulation of food biotechnology in Canada, Chap. 8: The precautionary principle and the regulation of food biotechnology. Royal Society of Canada rsc-scr.ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saladin, C. (2000). Precautionary principle in international law. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 6(3), 270–280. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.7814& rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Santillo, D., Johnston, P., & Stringer, R. (1999). The precautionary principle in practice: A mandate for anticipatory preventative action. In C. Raffensperger & J. A. Tickner (Eds.), Protecting public health & the environment: Implementing the precautionary principle (pp. 36–74). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santillo, D., Stringer, R. L., Johnston, P. A., & Tickner, J. (1998). The precautionary principle: Protecting against failures of scientific method and risk assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 36(12), 939–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2000). The precautionary principle and environmental policy – science, uncertainty, and sustainability. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 6(3), 263–265. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.7814&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants 2256 UNTS 119; 40 ILM 532 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Supreme Court of Canada, L’Heureux-Dube, Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Arbour and LeBel JJ, 114957 Canada (Spraytech) v. Hudson (Town), 2001 SCC 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supreme Court of India, M Jagannadha Rao, J, A.P. Pollution Control Board II v. Nayuda (2001) 2 SCC 62, [2000] Supp 5 SCR, 249 (Nayuda II); A.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD V. PROF.M.V.NAYUDU (RETD.) & ORS [1999] INSC 11 (27 January 1999) (Nayuda I).

    Google Scholar 

  • Supreme Court of Pakistan, Zia v WAPDA PLD (1994) SC 693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, J. A., & Hoppin, P, (2000) Children’s environmental health: A case study in implementing the precautionary principle. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 6(3), 281–288. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.7814&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Tollefson, C., & Thornback, J. (2007). Litigating the precautionary principle in domestic courts. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 19, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, 6th Session, ``Straddling Stocks Agreement`` (Aug. 4, 1995) article 6(2). http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N95/274/67/PDF/N9527467.pdf?OpenElement

  • United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, U.N. Agenda 21, Rio Declaration, Principle 15, reprinted in 31 ILM 874 (1992). http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Bergen Ministerial Declaration on Sustainable Development in the ECE Region, UNDoc. A/CONF.151/PC/10(1990) 1 YB Intl Envtl Law 429 (1990) (Bergen, Norway 1990); Article 7, reaffirmed at Dobris, Europe, 1991. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/efe/history%20of%20EfE/Dobris.E.pdf

  • University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Lowell Statement on Science and the Precautionary Principle, International Summit on Science and the Precautionary Principle, 20–22, September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST). (2005). The precautionary principle (p. 53). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001395/139578e.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa McClenaghan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

McClenaghan, T. (2014). Precautionary Principle. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2238

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2238

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics