Skip to main content
  • 403 Accesses

Synonyms

NDI

Definition

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10-item patient-rated instrument for assessing self-rated disability due to neck pain of mechanical origin. This would include categories such as “nonspecific neck pain,” whiplash, whiplash-associated disorder, repetitive strain injury, sports-related neck pain, and neck and arm pain.

Description

Introduction

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was developed in the late 1980s by Dr. Howard Vernon and first published in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics in 1991 (Vernon & Mior, 1991). The NDI was modelled on a similar instrument for assessing self-rated disability in low back pain patients – the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (Fairbank, Couper, Davies, & O’Brien, 1980) – which had been in existence for about 8 years. Dr. Vernon received permission from the developer of the “Oswestry Index” to modify it for use in neck pain patients.

After selecting some of the original items from the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackelman, B. H., & Lindgren, U. (2002). Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 284–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbank, J. C. T., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O’Brien, J. P. (1980). The oswestry low back pain disability index. Physiotherapy, 66, 271–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hains, F., Waalen, J., & Mior, S. (1998). Psychometric properties of the neck disability index. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 21, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDermid, J. C., Walton, D. M., Avery, S., Blanchard, A., Etruw, W., McAlpine, C., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2009). Measurement properties of the neck disability index: A systematic review. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 39, 400–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobon, B., Coeytaux, R. B., Carey, T. S., Richardson, W. J., & DeVellis, R. F. (2002). Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction – a systematic review. Spine, 27, 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, D. L., & Stratford, P. W. (1998). Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Physical Therapy, 78, 951–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, H. (2008). The neck disability index: State-of-the-art, 1991–2008. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 31, 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, H. T., & Mior, S. A. (1991). The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 14, 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Vernon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Vernon, H. (2014). Neck Disability Index. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1915

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1915

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics