Skip to main content

Item Analysis

  • Reference work entry
  • 136 Accesses

Definition

It refers to a group of analytical approaches allowing a multi-item scale to be assessed.

Description

In order to obtain meaningful synthetic scores by aggregating item scores from a multi-item scale, the items should be submitted to particular analytical procedures which allow items to be tested in their combined capacity and quality to measure the unobservable variable and go by the name of item analysis. The different approaches to item analysis refer to different model of scaling. Actually, the selected item analysis procedure allows a scaling model to be assessed.

Each scaling model represents a design aimed at consistently developing a new measure (Nunnally, 1978) by verifying items’ properties, including dimensionality, internal consistency, and convergent/discriminant validity. In particular, each scaling model aims at:

  • Testing the underlying conceptual model

  • Reestablishing the unity of the concept of interest

  • Synthesizing the multiple items (defining the synthetic...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Coombs, C. H. (1950). Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. Psychological Review, 57, 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H. (1953). Theory and methods of social measurements. In L. Festinger & D. Katz (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W. G. (1991) Data theory and dimensional analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07–078, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggino F. (2009) The state of the art in indicators construction in the perspective of a comprehensive approach in measuring well-being of societies, Firenze University Press, Archivio E-Prints, Firenze. Published also in Global Progress Research Network (GPRNet) Wikiprogress page (http://wikiprogress.org/index.php/Filomena_Maggino). Accepted on 21/01/2010.

  • McIver, J. P., & Carmines, E. G. (1979) Unidimensional scaling. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07–024, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York/London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filomena Maggino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Maggino, F. (2014). Item Analysis. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1551

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1551

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics