UAV Logistics for Life-Cycle Management

  • Cengiz Karaağaç
  • Ahmet G. Pakfiliz
  • Fulvia Quagliotti
  • Nafiz Alemdaroglu
Reference work entry


Although an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) does not require a crew onboard, it is a kind of flying platform, which requires nearly the same logistics support similar to the most manned aircraft. UAV system is a system of the systems. Thus, UAV logistics support should cover the required support for all subsystems of the UAV system including unmanned aircraft and, ground control station.

UAV logistics support system depends on many different parameters including the type of the UAV system, its operational requirements, and its operational environment. It should be a system with a reduced logistic footprint, enabling a fast deployment and high mobility.

Because of urgent operational requirement for the UAVs, traditional UAV design procedures weren't followed, and first prototypes were deployed for operations without enough consideration for logistics. So, mishap rate and sustainment cost of the initial UAVs was very high because of insufficient logistic consideration during design phase. Immature UAV systems have required many modernizations and upgrades.

UAV logistics support system depends on many different parameters including the type of the UAV system, its operational requirements, and its operational environment. For a small hand-launched UAV system, relatively little logistics support is required, while larger UAV systems mostly need more logistics support.

UAV logistics support should be considered during every phases of the life cycle. Logistics support efforts should be proactive to predict the possible problems before they become serious issues.

The goal of this chapter is to provide the reader with general knowledge on UAV Logistics for Life-Cycle Management with the logistics challenges faced by the UAV pioneers and the possible future UAV logistics trends which improve UAV employment.


Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Logistics Support Configuration Management Weapon System Maintenance Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    . RAND Project Air Force (PAF), Balancing rapid acquisition of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with support considerations, 2005, briefs/2005/RAND RB176. pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2012
  2. 2.
    U.S. Air Force, Unmanned Aircraft Systems Flight Plan 2009–2047, Headquarters, United States Air Force, Washington D.C., 18 May 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    . U.S. Army UAS Center of Excellence, U.S. Army Roadmap for UAS 2010–2035, The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, Fort Rucker, AlabamaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    . U.S. Marine Corps, MCWP 3-21.2 Aviation Logistics, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, PCN: 14300010200, 21 Oct 2002Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.A. Ingham, T. Jones, A. Maneschijn, Considerations for UAV design and operation in South African airspace. Aeronautical Journal 110, 695–701 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    . Defense Acquisition University, Life Cycle Logistics, Accessed 11 Feb 2012
  7. 7.
    . UK MoD, Defence Standard 00-600 Issue 1: Integrated Logistic Support Requirements for MOD Projects, UK Defence Standardization, 23 Apr 2010Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    . UK MoD, JSP 886 The Defence Logistics Support Chain Manual, Volume 7 Part 1, Version 2.4, 27 Nov 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    . NATO Joint Air Power Competence Centre, Strategic Concept of Employment for Unmanned Aircraft Systems in NATO, 4 Jan 2010Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    . UK MoD, Joint Doctrine Note 2/11 the UK Approach to Unmanned Aircraft Systems, UK MoD The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, SWINDON, Wiltshire, 30 Mar 2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    . U.S. Army, Regulation 700–127 Integrated Logistics Support, Headquarters, Department of the Army Washington, DC, 17 July 2008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    . U.S. DoD, MIL-STD-40051 Technical Manual Preparation, USAMC, Redstone Arsenal, AL, 31 July 1996Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    . ICAO, Annex 6 Operation of Aircraft, ICAO Headquarters, Montreal, Canada, July 2001Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    NATO, RTO-AG-300-V20 Logistics Test and Evaluation in Flight Test (NATO, Neuilly-sur-Seine, 2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.D. Coryell, Performance-Based Logistics, Contractor Logistics Support, and Stryker (U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Belvoir, 2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Defence Acquisition University, Performance Based Logistics: A Program Manager's Product Support Guide (Defense Acquisition University Press, Fort Belvoir, 2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    . U.S. DoD OUSD (AT&L) Memorandum, Performance Based Logistics: Purchasing Using Performance Based Criteria, U.S. DoD The Under Secretary of Defence, Washington, DC, 16 Aug 2004Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    . K. Vitasek, J. Cothran, S. Geary, S. Rutner, Performance-Based Logistics: the Changing Landscape in Support Contracting, University of Tennessee and Supply Chain Visions' White Paper, June 2006Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reg Austin, Unmanned Aircraft Systems: UAVS Design, Development and Deployment (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    . A. Hobbs, S.R. Herwitz, Human Challenges in the Maintenance of Unmanned Aircraft Systems, FAA and NASA Report (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.S. Gansler, W. Lucyshyn, L.H. Harrington, A.C. Corl, The Current State of Performance Based Logistics and Public-Private Partnerships for Depot-Level Maintenance: Operating Models, Outcomes, and Issues, The Center for Public Policy and Private Enterprise, Oct 2010Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    . MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance, U.S. DoD Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition,Technology, and Logistics), Washington, DC (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D.S. Rogers, R.S. Tibben-Lembke, Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices (University of Nevada/Center for Logistics Management, Reno, 1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    . C.J. Hodson, Civil Airworthiness for a UAV Control Station, The University of York, Department of Computer Science, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Reliability and Maintainability Guideline for Manufacturing Machinery and Equipment (Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, 1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R.R. Landers, Product Assurance Dictionary (Marlton Press, Marlton, 1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    . H.P. Barringer, A Life Cycle Cost Summary (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Kawauchi, M. Rausand, Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis in Oil And Chemical Process Industries (Department of Production and Quality Engineering/Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    . IEC60300-3-3, Life cycle costing, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cengiz Karaağaç
    • 1
  • Ahmet G. Pakfiliz
    • 2
  • Fulvia Quagliotti
    • 3
  • Nafiz Alemdaroglu
    • 4
  1. 1.Systems DepartmentSTM A.Ş.AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.3rd Air Supply and Maintenance CenterTurkish Air ForceAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly
  4. 4.Aerospace Engineering DepartmentMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations