From Research to Operations: The PITVANT UAS Training Experience
The PITVANT Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Research and Development (R&D) program training experience is described, including the different crew positions and responsibilities, as well as the several training phases. This is done by presenting the systems engineering methodology behind all the developments carried by the joint team of the Portuguese Air Force Academy and the Porto University, together with the PITVANT UAS architecture and main features. The training program is then described including theoretical classes, written exams, and practical instruction and evaluation. In addition, the process of developing, testing, and validating concepts of operations and the correspondent operational procedures and their training with the involvement of end users is also reported. The current operational capabilities of the systems are explained, showing that the PITVANT program has achieved a level of maturity that enables testing and validation in near real scenarios. This leads to the next step in the systems spiral development that should include, in the near future, the possibility of technology transfer to the industry. The PITVANT program is currently on its fifth year of existence, and the several air vehicles have logged about 730 takeoffs adding up to about 320 h of flight, most of which at the Portuguese Air Force Airbase in Ota, which is permanently assigned to the PITVANT program. Several operators and pilots have been trained under the scope of the program, and currently the team of 20 people operates the different PITVANT UAS on a daily basis. The extremely low accident ratio, of about 0.5 %, is a good indicator of the effectiveness of the training schemes that the research team has implemented.
At the end of the program, the team expects that the UAS have reached a level of maturity that will allow industrialization.
KeywordsOperational Team Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Unman Aircraft System Ground Control Station Flight Manager
- R. Austin, in Unmanned Aircraft Systems, ed. by I. Moir, A. Seabridge, R. Langton (Wiley, Chichester, 2010), p. 241Google Scholar
- B.S. Blanchard, W.J. Fabrycky, in Systems Engineering and Analysis, 4th edn. ed. by W.J. Fabrycky, J.H. Mize (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2006), pp. 505, 506Google Scholar
- H. Campos, G. Gonçalves, C.E. Oliveira, Plano de Gestão de Engenharia de Sistemas-PITVANT PGES v1.8 (Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Porto 2010), p. 2Google Scholar
- T.P. Cunha, Portugal e o Mar (Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, Lisboa, 2011), p.60Google Scholar
- J.C. Hoffman, C.T. Kamps, in Air & Space Power Journal (United States Air Force, Spring 2005), p. 36Google Scholar
- ICAO, Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Circular 328 (International Civil Aviation Organization, Montréal, 2011), p. 29Google Scholar
- A. Ribeiro, Assessment of Technology needs for UCAV – EUROPA MOU RTP 115.031 Final Report (Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa, 2008), p. 30Google Scholar
- STANAG 4586, in Standard Interfaces of UAV Control System (UCS) for NATO UAV Interoperability, prom., 2 edn. ed. by J.A. Moreno (NATO Standardization Agency, Brussels, 2007)Google Scholar
- STANAG 4670, Ed. 1: Recommended Guidance for the Training of Designated Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operator (DUO), prom., 1st edn. ed. by J.A. Moreno (NATO Standardization Agency, Brussels, 2009), p. 3Google Scholar