Advertisement

Layered Approach to Networked Command and Control of Complex UAS

  • Jack Elston
  • Maciej Stachura
  • C. Dixon
  • B. Argrow
  • Eric W. Frew
Reference work entry

Abstract

Different networking hardware, protocols, and sensors can be combined to create a diverse and complex unmanned aircraft system through a layered design approach with modular supporting software. A layered design simplifies both testing and system reconfiguration, lending itself to incremental verification while only requiring the maintenance of standard interfaces. Critical software components, such as service discovery, simplify the inclusion of a diverse set of subsystems and sensors. Maintaining the modularity of these software components ensures that the system can be expanded while requiring minimal software changes. An example of these design approaches is provided through the description of a system that enabled flight operations of a multi-vehicle unmanned aircraft system for performing targeted, in situ sampling of supercell thunderstorms during the 2010 VORTEX2 field campaign. This network's flexible nature facilitated the complex interworking of many subsystems while accommodating the strict deployment time constraints and generally unknown starting configurations typical of nomadic field operations. Data required for situ-ational awareness and mission-level decision making was retrieved from multiple remote and local sources, and mechanisms were provided for dissemination to any local participant. The architecture's modular design allowed for changes in the field and actively supported the addition and subtraction of nodes without requiring reconfiguration of the remainder of the system.

Keywords

Service Discovery Mesh Network Radio Dynamic Source Rout Controller Area Network Ground Vehicle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. M. Abolhasan, B. Hagelstein, J.C.-P. Wang, Real-world performance of current proactive multi-hop mesh protocols, in Proceedings of the IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Communications, Shanghai (IEEE, Piscataway, 2009)Google Scholar
  2. M. Alighanbari, J.P. How, Robust decentralized task assignment for cooperative uavs, in Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Keystone, vol. 5 (AIAA, Reston, 2006), pp. 3232–3247Google Scholar
  3. J. Allred, A.B. Hasan, S. Panichsakul, W. Pisano, P. Gray, J. Huang, R. Han, D. Lawrence, K. Mohseni, Sensorflock: an airborne wireless sensor network of micro-air vehicles, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Sydney (ACM, New York, 2007), pp. 117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AODV-UU, Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing (2010), http://core.it.uu.se/core/index.php/AODV-UU
  5. B. Argrow, D. Lawrence, E. Rasmussen, Uav systems for sensor dispersal, telemetry, and visualization in hazardous environments, in 43rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (AIAA, Reston, 2005)Google Scholar
  6. B.A.T.M.A.N., b.a.t.m.a.n (2010), https://www.open-mesh.org
  7. R.W. Beard, T.W. McLain, D.B. Nelson, D. Kingston, D. Johanson, Decentralized cooperative aerial surveillance using fixed-wing miniature uavs. IEEE Proc. Spec. Issue Multi-Robot Syst. 94(7), 1306–1324 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. D. Behnke, K. Daniel, C. Wietfeld, Comparison of distributed ad-hoc network planning algorithms for autonomous flying robots, in Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2011), 2011 IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–6 doi:10.1109/GLOCOM.2011.6134382Google Scholar
  9. T.X. Brown, D. Henkel, On controlled node mobility in delay-tolerant networks of unmanned aerial vehicles, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Advanced Radio Technologies (Institute for Telecommunication Sciences/National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Boulder, 2006)Google Scholar
  10. T.X. Brown, B.M. Argrow, E.W. Frew, C. Dixon, D. Henkel, J. Elston, H. Gates, Experiments using small unmanned aircraft to augment a mobile ad hoc network, in Emerging Technologies in Wireless LANs: Theory, Design, and Deployment, ed. by B. Bing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007), pp. 123–145. ISBN:ISBN-13: 9780521895842. Chapter 28Google Scholar
  11. I.D. Chakeres, E.M. Belding-Royer, Aodv routing protocol implementation design, in ICDCSW ' 04: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops – W7: EC (ICDCSW ' 04), Washington, DC (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2004), pp. 698–703Google Scholar
  12. H.C. Christmann, E.N. Johnson, Design and implementation of a self-configuring ad-hoc network for unmanned aerial systems, in AIAA Infotech@Aerospace, Rohnert Park (AIAA, Reston, 2007)Google Scholar
  13. Cloudcap, The cloudcap website (2011), http://cloudcaptech.com
  14. K.D. Davis, Interim operation approval guidance 08–01: unmanned aircraft systems operations in the U.S. national airspace system. FAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems Program Office (2008)Google Scholar
  15. C. Dixon, Controlled mobility of unmanned aircraft chains to optimize network capacity in realistic communication environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado, 2010Google Scholar
  16. J. Elston, Semi-autonomous small unmanned aircraft systems for sampling tornadic supercell thunderstorms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado, 2011Google Scholar
  17. J. Elston, B. Argrow, E.W. Frew, A distributed avionics package for small uavs, in AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference, Arlington (AIAA, Reston, 2005)Google Scholar
  18. J. Elston, B. Argrow, A. Houston, J. Lahowetz, Distributed atmospheric sensing using small uas and doppler radar, in AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference, Seattle (AIAA, Reston, 2009a)Google Scholar
  19. J. Elston, E.W. Frew, D. Lawrence, P. Gray, B. Argrow, Net-centric communication and control for a heterogeneous unmanned aircraft system. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 56(1–2), 199–232 (2009b)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. J.S. Elston, J. Roadman, M. Stachura, B. Argrow, A. Houston, E.W. Frew, The tempest unmanned aircraft system for in situ observations of tornadic supercells: design and vortex2 flight results. J. Field Robot. 28, 461–483 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EnGenius Tech Inc, The engenius website (2011), http://engeniustech.com
  22. E.W. Frew, D.A. Lawrence, S. Morris, Coordinated standoff tracking of moving targets using lyapunov guidance vector fields. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 31(2), 290–306 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. E.W. Frew, J. Elston, B. Argrow, A. Houston, E. Rasmussen, Sampling severe local storms and related phenomena: using unmanned aircraft systems. Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(1), 85–95 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. GRLevel3, grlevel3 (2010), http://www.grlevelx.com/grlevel3/
  25. Gumstix, The gumstix website (2012), http://www.gumstix.com
  26. J. Halverson, P.L. Azofeifa, M. Black, S. Braun, D. Cecil, M. Goodman, A. Heymsfield, G. Heymsfield, R. Hood, T. Krishnamurti, G. McFarquhar, J. Molinari, R. Rogers, J. Turk, C. Velden, D.-L. Zhang, E. Zipser, R. Kakar, Nasa ' s tropical cloud systems and processes (tcsp) experiment: investigating tropical cyclogenesis and hurricane intensity change. NASA TCSP News (2005). http://tcsp.nsstc.nasa.gov/news.html
  27. D. Henkel, C. Dixon, J. Elston, T.X. Brown, A reliable sensor data collection network using unmanned aircraft, in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Multi-hop Ad Hoc Networks: from theory to reality (REALMAN) (ACM, New York, 2006)Google Scholar
  28. S. Hipskind, G. Tyrell, G. Holland, J. Curry, Use of the aerosonde uninhabited aerial vehicle (UAV) in the fourth convection and moisture experiment (CAMEX 4), in AIAA ' s 1st Technical Conference and Workshop on Unmanned Aerospace Vehicles, Portsmouth (AIAA, Reston, 2002)Google Scholar
  29. T.F. Hock, J.L. Franklin, The ncar gps dropwindsonde. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80(3), 407–420 (1999). ISSN 0003–0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. A. Houston, B. Argrow, J. Elston, J. Lahowetz, P. Kennedy, The collaborative colorado-nebraska unmanned aircraft system experiment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 39–54 (2011) (In Submission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. J. How, E. King, Y. Kuwata, Flight demonstrations of cooperative control for uav teams, in Proceedings of the AIAA 3rd Unmanned Unlimited Technical Conference, Workshop and Exhibit, Chicago (AIAA, Reston, 2004)Google Scholar
  32. D.B. Johnson, D.A. Maltz, J. Broch, Dsr: the dynamic source routing protocol for multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks, in In Ad Hoc Networking, ed. by C.E. Perkins (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2001) pp. 139–172. Chapter 5Google Scholar
  33. E. Kohler, R. Morris, B. Chen, J. Jannotti, M. Frans Kaashoek, The click modular router. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 18, 263–297 (2000). ISSN 0734–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. N.E. Leonard, D.A. Paley, R.E. Davis, D.M. Fratantoni, F. Lekien, F. Zhang, Coordinated control of an underwater glider fleet in an adaptive ocean sampling field experiment in monterey bay. J. Field Robot. 27(6), 718–740 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. P.-H. Lin, C.-S. Lee, The eyewall-penetration reconnaissance observation of typhoon longwang (2005) with unmanned aerial vehicle, aerosonde. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 25(1), 15–25 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. J. Love, J. Jariyasunant, E. Pereira, M. Zennaro, K. Hedrick, C. Kirsch, R. Sengupta, Csl: a language to specify and re-specify mobile sensor network behaviors. (IEEE RTSS), 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  37. Office of the Secretary of Defense, FY2009–2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap (Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2009)Google Scholar
  38. Performance Analysis of Telecommunication Systems (PATS) research group, An implementation of aodv in click (2012), http://www.pats.ua.ac.be/software/aodv
  39. E. Rasmussen, Situational awareness for severe storms intercept (2010), http://www.rasmsys.com/Software/page8/page8.html
  40. M. Stachura, E.W. Frew, Cooperative target localization with a communication aware unmanned aircraft system. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 34(5), 1352–1362 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. J.M. Straka, E.N. Rasmussen, S.E. Fredrickson, A mobile mesonet for finescale meteorological observations. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 13(5), 921–936 (1996). ISSN 0739–0572. doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0921:AMMFFM>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tempest, The recuv tempest ua website (2010), http://recuv.colorado.edu/tempest
  43. J. Tisdale, Z. Kim, J. Hedrick, Autonomous uav path planning and estimation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 16(2), 35–42 (2009). ISSN 1070–9932. doi:10.1109/MRA.2009.932529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. J. Zheng, M.J. Lee, A comprehensive performance study of IEEE 802.15.4, in Sensor Network Operations (IEEE, Piscataway, 2006), pp. 218–237Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack Elston
    • 1
  • Maciej Stachura
    • 1
  • C. Dixon
    • 2
  • B. Argrow
    • 3
  • Eric W. Frew
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace Engineering SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.College of Engineering and Applied ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  3. 3.Director Research and Engineering Center for Unmanned VehiclesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations