Inventing a Biologically Inspired, Energy-Efficient Micro Aerial Vehicle

Reference work entry

Abstract

In recent years, research efforts have focused on the design, development, and deployment of unmanned systems for a variety of applications ranging from intelligence and surveillance to border patrol, rescue operations, etc. Micro aerial vehicles are viewed as potential targets that can provide agility and accurate small area coverage while being costeffective and can be easily launched by a single operator. The small size of MAVs allows such flight operations within confined space but the control effectors must provide sufficient maneuverability, while maintaining stability, with only limited sensing capability onboard the platform. To meet these challenges, researchers have long been attracted by the amazing attributes of biological systems, such as those exhibited by birds and insects. Birds can fly in dense flocks, executing rapid maneuvers with g-loads far in excess of modern fighter aircrafts, and yet never collide with each other, despite the absence of air traffic controllers. This chapter introduces a novel framework for the design and control of a micro air vehicle. The vehicle’s conceptual design is based on biologically inspired principles and emulates a dragonfly (Odonata-Anisoptera). A sophisticated multilayered hybrid and linear/non-linear controller to achieve extended flight times and improved agility compared to other rotary and flapping wing MAV designs. The chapter addresses the design and control features of the proposed QV design and gives an overview on the developmental efforts towards the prototyping of the flyer. The potential applications for such a high-endurance vehicle are numerous, including airdeployable mass surveillance in cluster and swarm formations. The disposability of the vehicle would help in battlefield deployment as well, where such a, MAV would be made available to soldiers for proximity sensing and threat level assessment. Other applications would include search and rescue operations and civilian law enforcement.

Keywords

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Step Response Lead Edge Vortex Actuation Mechanism Rotary Wing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Air Force Office of Scientific Research for sponsoring the research and development of the project. We also acknowledge the support of our industrial partner Impact Technologies, LLC. The authors thank the undergraduate student members and research scholars for their contributions: Seong-Joo Kim, Jung-Ho Moon, Emanuel M. Jones, Thomas.

D. Pappas, Andrew Punnoose, Aaron T. May, Maha Hosain, and Joshua A. Sandler. We also acknowledge the facilities and resources provided by Georgia Institute of Technology for the research.

References

  1. A. Cox, D. Monopoli, D. Cveticanin, M. Goldfarb, E. Garcia, The development of elastodynamic components for piezoelectrically actuated flapping micro-air vehicles. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 13(9), 611–615 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Grasmeyer, M. Keenon, Development of the black widow micro aerial vehicle, in 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, 2001Google Scholar
  3. D. Jung, J. Ratti, P. Tsiotras, Real-time implementation and validation of a new hierarchical path planning scheme of uavs via hardware in the loop simulation. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 54(3), 163–181 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Keshavan, N.M. Wereley, A. Gessow, Design and development of a high frequency biologically- inspired flapping wing mechanism, in48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASCStructures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, 2007Google Scholar
  5. R. Kornbluh, Project mentor: biologically inspired platform, in Keynote Presentation at the 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, June 2002Google Scholar
  6. R. Michelson, Update on flapping wing micro air vehicle research-ongoing work to develop a flapping wing, crawling entomopter, in 13th Bristol International RPV/UAV Systems Conference Proceedings, Bristol, 1998, pp. 30.1–30.12Google Scholar
  7. R. Michelson, D. Helmick, S. Reece, C. Amarena, A reciprocating chemical muscle (rcm) for micro air vehicle ‘entomopter’ flight, in Proceedings of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, Baltimore, 1997, pp. 429–435Google Scholar
  8. D.J. Pines, F. Bohorquez, Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development. J. Aircr. 43(2), 290–305 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. T.N. Pornsin sirirak, S.W. Lee, H. Nassef, J. Grasmeyer, Y.C. Tai, C.M. Ho, M. Keenon, Mems wing technology for a battery-powered ornithopter, in Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Annual International Conference on MEMS, Miyazaki, 2000Google Scholar
  10. D. Prosser, T. Basrai, J. Dickert, J. Ratti, A. Crassidis, G. Vachtsevanos, Wing kinematics and aerodynamics of a hovering flapping micro aerial vehicle, in IEEE Aerospace, 2011Google Scholar
  11. D. L. Raney, E.C. Slominski, Mechanization and control concepts for biologically inspired micro air vehicles. J. Aircr. 41(6), 1257–1265 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Ratti, G. Vachtsevanos, A biologically-inspired micro aerial vehicle: sensing, modeling and control strategies. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 60(1), 153–178 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Ratti, G. Vachtsevanos, Towards energy efficiency in micro hovering air vehicles, in IEEE Aerospace, 2011Google Scholar
  14. J. Ratti, R. Goel, S.-J. Kim, J.-H. Moon, T.D. Pappas, G. Vachtsevanos, M. Roemer, Bio-inspired micro air vehicle: design and control issues, in AIAA Infotech@Aerospace, 2010Google Scholar
  15. J. Ratti, E.M. Jones, G. Vachtsevanos, Fixed frequency variable amplitude (fifva) actuation systems for micro aerial vehicles, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion@ICRA, Shanghai, 2011aGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Ratti, J.-H. Moon, G. Vachtsevanos, Towards low- power, low-profile avionics architecture and control for micro aerial vehicles, in IEEE Aerospace, 2011bGoogle Scholar
  17. J.M. Rayner, A new approach to animal flight mechanics. J. Exp. Biol. 80, 17–54 (1979)Google Scholar
  18. P. Samuel, J. Sirohi, L. Rudd, D. Pines, R. Perel, Design and development of a micro coaxial rotorcraft, in Proceedings of the AHS Vertical Lift Aircraft Design Conference, American Helicopter Society, Alexandria, Jan 2000Google Scholar
  19. G. Vachtsevanos, Hierarchical control, in Handbook of Fuzzy Computation (Institute of Physics Publishing, 1998), pp. 42–53Google Scholar
  20. G. Vachtsevanos, B. Ludington, Unmanned aerial vehicles: challenges and technologies for improved autonomy. WSEAS Trans. Syst. 5, 2164–2171 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robotics & Intelligent MachinesTechJect Inc.AtlantaUSA
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Computer EngineeringThe Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations