Connectivity implies connection or movement of resources across the landscape. Wetlands are dynamic ecosystems imbedded within or at the edges of larger systems and thus wetlands are natural “connectors” between upland and aquatic systems. Although many ecological processes have been used to describe wetland connectivity, here the focus is the movement of water and animals within and among wetlands as these are known agents of connectivity. Prior to these examples, a brief discussion of how connectivity has been used in the legal protection of wetlands demonstrates why connectivity is important to the conservation of wetlands.
- Animal movements
- Buffer zone
- Isolated wetlands
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Amezaga JM, Santamaría L, Green AJ. Biotic wetland connectivity – supporting a new approach for wetland policy. Acta Oecola. 2002;23:213–22.
Aquiloni L, Ilhéu M, Gherardi F. Habitat use and dispersal of the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in ephemeral water bodies of Portugal. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol. 2005;38:225–36.
Baguette M, Van Dyck H. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landsc Ecol. 2007;22:1117–29.
Baldwin RF, Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG. Conservation planning for amphibian species with complex habitat requirements: a case study using movements and habitat selection of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). J Herpetol. 2006;40:442–53.
Brinson MM. Changes in the functioning of wetlands along environmental gradients. Wetlands. 1993;13:65–72.
Bunn SE, Arthington AH. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag. 2002;30:492–507.
Carroll C, McRae BH, Brookes A. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conserv Biol. 2012;26:78–87.
Charney ND. Evaluating expert opinion and spatial scale in an amphibian model. Ecol Model. 2012;242:37–45.
Compton BW, McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Gamble LR. A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools. Conserv Biol. 2007;21:788–99.
Cosentino BJ, Schooley RL, Phillips CA. Connectivity of agroecosystems: dispersal costs can vary among crops. Landsc Ecol. 2011;26:371–9.
DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM. Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2005;36:147–68.
Downing DM, Winer C, Wood LD. Navigating through clean water act jurisdiction: a legal review. Wetlands. 2003;23:475–93.
Eigenbroda F, Stephen SJ, Hecnarb J, Fahrig L. The relative effects of road traffic and forest cover on anuran populations. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:35–46.
Euliss NH, LaBaugh JW, Fredrickson LH, Mushet DM, Laubhan MK, Swanson GA, Winter TC, Rosenberry DO, Nelson RD. The wetland continuum: a conceptual framework for interpreting biological studies. Wetlands. 2004;24:448–58.
Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2007;16:265–80.
Furukawa K, Wolanski E, Mueller H. Currents and sediment transport in mangrove forests. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 1997;44:301–10.
Gagne SA, Fahrig L. Effect of landscape contect on anuran communitites in breeding ponds in the National Capital Regions, Canada. Landsc Ecol. 2007;22:205–15.
Gamble LR, McGarigal K, Compton BW. Fidelity and dispersal in the pond-breeding amphibian, Ambystoma opacum: implications for spatio-temporal population dynamics and conservation. Biol Conserv. 2007;139:247–57.
Gibbs JP, Shriver WG. Can road mortality limit populations of pool-breeding amphibians? Wetl Ecol Manag. 2005;13:281–9.
Haig SM, Mehlman DW, Oring LW. Avian movements and wetland connectivity in landscape conservation. Conserv Biol. 1998;12:749–58.
Hamer AJ, McDonnell MJ. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: a review. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:2432–49.
Harper EB, Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. Demographic consequences of terrestrial habitat loss for pool-breeding amphibians: predicting extinction risks associated with inadequate size of buffer zones. Conserv Biol. 2008;22:1205–15.
Johnson ML, Gaines MS. Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1990;21:449–80.
Johnson WC, Werner B, Guntenspergen GR, Voldseth RA, Millett B, Naugle DE, Tulbure M, Carroll RWH, Tracy J, Olawsky C. Prairie wetland complexes as landscape functional units in a changing climate. BioScience. 2010;60:128–40.
Kaplan D, Munoz-Carpena R, Wan Y, Hedgepeth M, Zheng F, Roberts R, Rossmanith R. Linking river, floodplain, and vadose zone hydrology to improve restoration of a coastal river affected by saltwater intrusion. J Environ Qual. 2010;39:1570–84.
Kusler J. The SWANCC decision and state regulation of wetlands. Association of State Wetland Managers. 2001. http://www.aswm.org/pdf_lib/swancc_and_state_regulation_060101.pdf
Lafleur PM, Hember RA, Admiral SW, Roulet NT. Annual and seasonal variability in evapotranspiration and water table at a shrub-covered bog in southern Ontario, Canada. Hydrol Process. 2005;19:3533–50.
Marsh DM, Trenham PC. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:40–9.
McRae BH. Isolation by resistance. Evolution. 2006;60:1551–61.
Menon NN, Balchand AN, Menon NR. Hydrobiology of the Cochin backwater system – a review. Hydrobiologia. 2000;430:149–83.
Peacock C. Rivers, floodplains and wetlands: connectivity and dynamics. 2003. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, p. 64.
Peterson A, Richgels KD, Johnson PJ, McKenzie V. Investigating the dispersal routes used by an invasive amphibian, Lithobates catesbeianus, in human-dominated landscapes. Biol Invasions. 2013;15:2179–91.
Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. Grasslands as movement barriers for a forest-associated salamander: migration behavior of adult and juvenile salamanders at a distinct habitat edge. Biol Conserv. 2006;131:14–22.
Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands. 2007;27:153–61.
Roe JH, Brinton AC, Georges AG. Temporal and spatial variation in landscape connectivity for a freshwater turtle in a temporally dynamic wetland system. Ecol Appl. 2009;19:1288–99.
Roelke DL, Spatharis S, Mitrovic SM. A new hydrology: effects on ecosystem form and functioning. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2012;69:1377–9.
Safner T, Miaud C, Gaggiotti O, Decout S, Rioux D, Zundel SP, Manuel SP. Combining demography and genetic analysis to assess the population structure of an amphibian in a human-dominated landscape. Conserv Genet. 2011;12:161–73.
Sawyer SC, Epps CW, Brashares JS. Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least-cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? J Appl Ecol. 2011;48:668–78.
Schmidt PR. DU comments on clean water draft guidance. Ducks unlimited. 2011. http://www.ducks.org/resources/media/Conservation/Clean%20Water/CWA_GuidanceComments_DU_EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0409.pdf
Semlitsch RD. Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians. J Wildl Manag. 2008;72:260–7.
Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:1219–28.
Semlitsch RD, Jensen JB. Core habitat, not buffer zone. Nat Wetl Newsl. 2001;23:5–11.
Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF, Dezzani R, Delmelle E, Vierling L, Waits LP. Putting the “landscape” in landscape genetics. Heredity. 2007;98:128–42.
Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos. 1993;68:571–3.
Tiner RW. Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States. Wetlands. 2003;23:494–516.
Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul Rivers Res Manage. 1999;15:125–39.
Wright CK. Spatiotemporal dynamics of prairie wetland networks: power-law scaling and implications for conservation planning. Ecology. 2010;91:1924–30.
Zedler JB, Kercher S. Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2004;23:431–52.
Zeller K, McGarigal K, Whiteley A. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc Ecol. 2012;27:777–97.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rittenhouse, T.A., Peterman, W.E. (2018). Connectivity of Wetlands. In: , et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_54
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3493-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9659-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences