The three-level approach for developing environmental flow methods spans relatively simple desktop estimates of flow needs to a highly sophisticated program of research and modeling to refine environmental flow targets. Each level builds information, capacity, and support for subsequent levels of sophistication as deemed necessary. In this way, proactive, practical implementation can begin immediately upon completion of the level of assessment most suitable to the resources available to a particular water body, jurisdiction, and associated circumstances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Esselman, P.C. and Opperman, J.J., 2010. Overcoming information limitations for the prescription of an environmental flow regime for a Central American river. Ecology and Society, 15(6).Google Scholar
Mathews R, Richter BD. Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2007;43:1400–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poff, N. Leroy, et al. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 2010;55(1):147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol. 1996;10:1163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Braun DP, Powell J. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Regul Rivers:Res Manage. 1998;14:329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, B.D., Warner, A.T., Meyer, J.L. and Lutz, K. A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications. 2010;22(3): 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar