The Wetland Book pp 1741-1758 | Cite as

Hydrological Assessment and Monitoring of Wetlands

Reference work entry

Abstract

This section introduces ecohydrological conceptual models as a repository for knowledge about the combined ecological and hydrological functioning of a wetland and then provides a starting point (or initial framework) for the development of such a model. An ecohydrological conceptual model only needs to include critical elements and mechanisms, in only as much detail as is necessary, of the ecohydrological functioning of the wetland. The model must be recorded, for continuity of knowledge, through maps, diagrams, narrative description, and key data, such as water levels and vegetation surveys. The ecohydrological conceptual model should be continually tested against new data and information and revised and refined as necessary. Also introduced are hydro-environmental supporting conditions (HSCs), defined in terms of, for example, water levels, flow, or water chemistry, that are required to support wetland plant communities. A suite of techniques for ecohydrological investigation and characterization of wetlands are described. These include desk study, walkover surveys and site investigation and monitoring of wetland substrate, water levels, vegetation classification systems, and water chemistry. The results of HSCs can be used to develop and refine the ecohydrological conceptual model.

Keywords

Wetlands monitoring Hydrology Hydrogeology 

References

  1. Barsoum N, Anderson R, Broadmeadow S, Bishop H, Nisbet T. Ecohydrological guidelines for wet woodland – phase 1. English Nature research report No.619, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. Beamish D, Farr G. Airborne geophysics: a novel approach to assist hydrogeological investigations at groundwater – dependent wetlands. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol. 2013;v46:53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke D, Sanitwong Na Ayuttaya S. Predicted effects of climate change, vegetation and tree cover on dune slack habitats at Ainsdale on the Sefton Coast, UK. J Coast Conserv. 2010;14(2):115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Environment Agency. Ecohydrological guidelines for lowland wetland plant communities. Fens and mires update, Mar 2010.Google Scholar
  5. Gilman K. Hydrology and wetland conservation. Chichester: Wiley; 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Gooddy DC, Darling GW, Abesser C, Lapworth DJ. Using Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6) to characterise groundwater movement and residence time in a lowland chalk catchment. J Hydrol. 2006;330(1–2):44–52. http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/4481/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gowing, DJG, Lawson CS, Youngs EG, Barber KR, Rodwell JS, Prosser MV, Wallace HL, Mountford JO and Spoor G. The water regime requirements and the response to hydrological change of grassland plant communities. Institute of Water and Environment, Silsoe, Beds. (2002), Project BD1310. Available from www.floodplainmeadows.org.uk
  8. Hiscock KM. Hydrogeology: principles and practice. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Mould DJ, Frahm E, Salzmann T, Miegel K, Acreman MC. Estimating the use of diurnal groundwater fluctuations for estimating evapotranspiration in wetland environments: case studies in southeast England and northeast Germany. Ecohydrology. 2010;3:294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Price M. Introducing groundwater. London: Chapman and Hall; 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodwell JS. National vegetation classification: users handbook. (2006). JNCC. http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/pub06_NVCusershandbook2006.pdf
  12. Saccon P, Leis A, Marca A, Kaiser J, Campisi L, Böttcher ME, Savarino J, Escher P, Eisenhauer A, Erbland J. Multi-isotope approach for the identification and characterisation of multiple nitrate pollution sources in the Marano Lagoon (Italy) and part of its catchment area. Appl Geochem. 2013;34:75–89. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlumberger Water Services. River basin planning through targeted investigations on selected Welsh groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems (GWDTEs): Cors Bodeilo and Merthyr Mawr. (2010). 1–274/R3 for Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  14. UKTAG. Guidance on the identification and risk assessment of groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems. (2004). Version 5 http://www.wfduk.org/sites/default/files/Media/Characterisation%20of%20the%20water%20environment/Risk%20assessment%20of%20terrestrial%20ecosystems%20groundwater_Draft_210104.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Low
    • 1
  • Gareth Farr
    • 2
  • Derek Clarke
    • 3
  • David Mould
    • 4
  1. 1.Rigare Ltd, AbergavennyCardiffUK
  2. 2.British Geological SurveyTongwynlaisUK
  3. 3.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  4. 4.Water Management TeamCanal and River TrustWarwickshireUK

Personalised recommendations