The Wetland Book pp 2085-2095 | Cite as

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for Wetlands: Overview

  • Roel Slootweg
Reference work entry


Whereas Environmental Impact Assessment is applied at the project level, the objective of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is to address the environmental consequences and stakeholder concerns in the development of policies and other high-level initiatives. Because SEA is integrated into the policy processes of individual countries, there is not one generally agreed SEA procedure. Nevertheless, SEA generally consists of the following phases: (1) visioning and objective setting; (2) technical assessment; (3) analysis and decision making; (4) monitoring and evaluation. SEA can be a standalone process alongside the regular planning process, but to influence policies effectively a stronger integration is necessary. Key factors promoting the effectiveness of SEA are a flexible approach that follows the decision-making process, participation of stakeholders, the political will to use SEA results, and good regulatory capacity and public relations for SEA. SEA can range from a mainly environmental focus to an integrated approach which also incorporates social and economic concerns.


Strategic environmental assessment Wetlands Environmental policy and planning Stakeholder participation Decision-making 


  1. CBD. Decision VIII/28 Impact assessment: voluntary guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive impact assessment. Montreal: Convention on Biological Diversity; 2006. Available at:
  2. Chaker A, El-Fadl K, Chamas L, Hatjian B. A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2006;26:15–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalal-Clayton B, Sadler B. Strategic environmental assessment, a sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. London: Earthscan; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. European Council. Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 Jun 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Off J L 197, 21/07/2001, 0030–0037.
  5. Herrera RJ. Strategic environmental assessment: the need to transform the environmental assessment paradigms. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 9:211–234.IAIA (2002). Strategic environmental assessment performance criteria. Special Publication Series No. 1; 2007.
  6. IAIA. Strategic environmental assessment performance criteria. IAIA special publication series, Vol. 1. Fargo, USA: International Association for Impact Assessment; 2002Google Scholar
  7. OECD Development Assistance Committee. Applying strategic environmental assessment. Good practice guidance for development co operation. DAC Guidelines and Reference Series; 2006.
  8. Partidário MP. Scales and associated data. What is enough for SEA needs? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2007;27:460–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sadler B, Verheem R. Strategic environmental assessment: status, challenges and future directions, report 53. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment; 1996.Google Scholar
  10. Slootweg R, Rajvanshi A, Mathur VB, Kolhoff A. Biodiversity in environmental assessment: enhancing ecosystem services for human well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  11. Therivel R, Partidario MR, editors. The practice of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan; 1996.Google Scholar
  12. UNECE. Protocol on strategic environmental assessment to the convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context. Kiev: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe; 2003. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Slootweg en van SchootenOegstgeestThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations