The Wetland Book pp 2019-2029 | Cite as

Environmental Impact Assessment for Wetlands: Overview

Reference work entry

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process of evaluating the likely environmental impacts of a proposed project or development, taking into account interrelated socioeconomic, cultural, and human-health impacts. The main objectives of EIA are to incorporate environmental considerations into the decision-making process, and to minimize or offset the adverse effects of development proposals. EIA initially developed in the USA in the late 1960s in response to growing concern about environmental degradation and was later adopted more widely by various international agencies and the EU. EIA consists of various stages: screening, scoping, impact assessment and evaluation, reporting, review, decision-making, and monitoring/enforcement. The effectiveness of EIA is constrained by the capacity of the organizations responsible for its implementation, which varies in relation to the political and governance context of different countries. The importance of EIA for wetlands is recognized by important international conventions such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands.

Keywords

Environmental impact assessment Sustainable development Decision-making Envirionmental policy Governance 

References

  1. Cherp A. EA legislation and practice in Central and Eastern Europe and the former USSR: a comparative analysis. Environ Impact Asses Rev. 2001;21:335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cherp A, Antypas A. Dealing with continuous reform: towards adaptive EA policy systems in countries in transition. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 2003;5:455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chistensen P, Kørnøv L, Nielsen EH. EIA as a regulation: does it work. J Environ Plan Manag. 2003;48:393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Espinoza G, Alzina V, editors. Review of environmental impact assessment in selected countries of Latin America and the Caribbean: methodology, results and trends. Santiago: Inter-American Development Bank/Centre for Development Studies; 2001.Google Scholar
  5. European Council. Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal of the European Council No. L 175, 05/07/1985: 0040–0048.Google Scholar
  6. European Council. Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal of the European Council No. L 73/5, 14/03/1997.Google Scholar
  7. Heuvelhof EFT, Nauta CM. (M)ERKENNING, Onderzoek naar de doorwerking van m.e.r. Evaluatiecommissie Wet Milieubeheer. The Hague: Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Planning and Environment; 1996.Google Scholar
  8. IAIA. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. International Association for Impact Assessment, USA/Institute of Environmental Assessment, U.K. 1999. http://www.iaia.org/Non_Members/Activity_Resources/key_resources.htm
  9. Kolhoff AJ, Runhaar HAC, Driessen PPJ. The contribution of capacities and context to EIA system performance and effectiveness in developing countries: towards a better understanding. Impact Asses Proj Appraisal. 2009;27:271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Purnama D. Reform of the EIA process in Indonesia: improving the role of public involvement. Environ Impact Asses Rev. 2003;12:75–88.Google Scholar
  11. Ramsar Convention. Impact assessment: guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment. In: Ramsar Handbooks for the wise use of wetlands. 4th ed, vol. 16. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat; 2010.Google Scholar
  12. Sadler B. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment, Final Report, Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance. Minister of Supply Services; 1996.Google Scholar
  13. Slootweg R, Rajvanshi A, Mathur VB, Kolhoff A. Biodiversity in environmental assessment: enhancing ecosystem services for human well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  14. UNEP. Environmental impact assessment training resource manual. Second ed. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Program; 2002. http://www.unep.ch/etu/publications/EIAMan_2edition_toc.htmGoogle Scholar
  15. Wood C. Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review. London: Pearson Education; 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Slootweg en van SchootenOegstgeestThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations