Economics of Wetland Conservation Case Study: Learning from Managed Realignment

Reference work entry

Abstract

The term “coastal squeeze” describes the loss of intertidal wetland habitat, a combined result of a sinking coastline and rising sea levels constraining the extent of intertidal wetland margins as they abut hard flood and sea defenses and infrastructure such as port facilities. This is driving innovation in the management of coastal flooding through such techniques as managed realignment, where land formerly “reclaimed” for agriculture and other uses is allowed to revert to intertidal wetland habitat. As these habitats reform, a range of beneficially and formerly undervalued services such as flood risk regulation, habitat for wildlife including fishery recruitment, nutrient cycling, and characteristic landscapes are restored. This chapter draws lessons about value creation by the recreation of these various ecosystem services drawing upon studies of four managed realignment schemes.

Keywords

Blackwater Wareham Managed realignment Flood defense Coastal defense Cost benefit analysis Stakeholders Ecosystem services Fisheries No net loss Coastal squeeze Missing markets 

References

  1. Adams CA. Carbon burial and greenhouse gas fluxes of new intertidal and saltmarsh sediments. PhD thesis submitted to the University of East Anglia; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Colclough S, Fonseca L, Astley T, Thomas K, Watts W. Fish utilisation of managed realignments. J Fish Manag Ecol. 2005;12:351–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ComCoast. ComCoast work package 2: socio-economic valuation: practical application of evaluation techniques for a ComCoast solution – final summary and recommendations; 2007.Google Scholar
  4. ComCoast. COMCOAST: COMbined Functions in COASTal Defence Zones. Interreg IIIB North Sea Programme; Undated. http://www.northsearegion.eu/iiib/projectpresentation/details/&tid=25&theme=2. Accessed 14 sep 2016.
  5. Defra. An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. The Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London; 2007. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/an-introductory-guide-to-valuing-ecosystem-services. Accessed 30 Aug 2013.
  6. Dixon M, Morris RKA, Scott CR, Birchenough A, Colclough S. Managed coastal realignment: lessons from Wallasea, UK. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Maritime Engineering 000 Issue MAO; 2007. p. 1–11.Google Scholar
  7. Everard M. Ecosystem services case studies. Environment Agency Science report SCHO0409BPVM-E-E. Environment Agency, Bristol; 2009. http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/SCHO0409BPVM-E-E.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2013.
  8. Fonseca L. Fish utilisation of saltmarshes and managed realignment areas in SE England. Ph.D thesis, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London; 2009.Google Scholar
  9. Fonseca L, Colclough S, Hughes R. Variations in the feeding of 0-group bass Dicentrarchus labrax (L.) in managed realignment areas and saltmarshes in SE England. Hydrobiologia. 2011. doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0753-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green BG, Smith DJ, Grey J, Underwood JC. High site fidelity and low site connectivity in temperate salt marsh fish populations: a stable isotope approach. Oecologia. 2012;168:245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laffaille P, Lefeuvre J-C, Schricke M-T, Feunteun E. Feeding ecology of 0-group sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax, in salt marshes of Mont Saint Michel Bay (France). Estuaries. 2001;24:116–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luisetti T. Alternative economic approaches to the assessment of managed realignment policy in England. Ph.D thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, The University of East Anglia; 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Vieira da Silva L. Ecosystem services assessment at Steart Peninsula, Somerset, UK. MSc thesis, Imperial College London; 2012.Google Scholar
  14. Vieira da Silva L, Everard M, Shore R. Ecosystem services assessment at steart peninsula, somerset, UK. Ecosystem Services. 2014;10:19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colcough and Coates - Sc2 LimitedWaldersladeUK
  2. 2.Institute of Fisheries ManagementWalderslade, KentUK
  3. 3.International Water Security Network, University of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations