Mediated Well-Being from the Perspective of Media and Communication Studies

  • Divina Frau-Meigs
Reference work entry


This exploration of the relationship between media and children, with well-being at the centre, considers what theories and major scientific research perspectives have prevailed in the field as well as the assumptions, evidence and results over time. It posits the notion of “mediated well-being” and follows its evolution from early media studies (with a strong sociological component) to current multidisciplinary communication studies applied to complex cross and mixed media such as the Internet and its interactive platforms (with a strong psychological and cognitive component).

Such a complex analysis is conducted by considering three types of controversies around well-being in the media that have helped build the field of communication studies itself: effects versus uses, risk versus play, protection versus participation. These considerations lead to an examination of the main methodological approaches adopted in the area and outline a research agenda for further exploration of the relation between media and well-being. This synthetic analysis suggests that the issue of children’s well-being has been central to the construction of the field of media studies in its origins, that content issues have been central to policymaking, and that children should be more incorporated into the research of what happens in the current situation of a two-way shuttle screen, where a lot of transmedia activities are generated by them and for them.


Young People Civil Society Media Environment Cultivation Theory Moral Panic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aarseth, E. (2003). Playing research: Methodological approaches to game analysis. Proceedings of the digital Arts & culture conference, Melbourne. Available online at Scholar
  2. Allard, L., & Blondeau, L. (2007). Culture numérique, cultures expressives. Médiamorphoses, 21, 18–54.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). The effects of media violence on society. Science, 295, 2377–2379.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., Blanchard, E. B., & Ritter, B. (1969). The relative efficacy of desensitization and modeling approaches for inducing behavioral, affective and attitudinal changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 173–199.Google Scholar
  5. Barbero, J. M. (1993). Communication, culture and hegemony: From media to mediations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (1992, 1st published 1986). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: Past, present, and future. Child Indicator Research, 1, 3–16.Google Scholar
  9. Ben-Arieh, A., & George, R. M. (Eds.). (2006). Indicators of children’s well-being: Understanding their role, usage and policy influence. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, L. W. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Berger, C. R., & Chaffee, S. H. (Eds.). (1987). Handbook of communication science. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18(3), 298–306.Google Scholar
  13. Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Bovill, M., & Livingstone, S. (2001). Bedroom culture and the privatization of media use. In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study (pp. 179–200). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, J. (2002). Mass media influences on sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 39(22), 42–45.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, J., & L’Engle, K. (2009). X-rated: sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. Early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36, 129–151.Google Scholar
  17. Buckingham, D. (2000a). After the death of childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic media. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  18. Buckingham, D. (2000b). The making of citizens: Young people, news and politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Buckingham, D. (2002). Children and new media. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Casas, F. (2008). Children’s Cultures and new technologies: A gap between generations? some reflections from the Spanish context. In A. James & A. L. James (Eds.), European childhoods: Cultures, politics and participation (pp. 61–82). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, S. (1973). Folk devils and moral panics. St Albans: Paladin.Google Scholar
  23. Critcher, C. (2003). Moral panics and the media. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Czitrom, D. (1982). Media and the American mind. Durham: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dahlgren, P., & Olsson, T. (2007). Young activists, political horizons and the internet: Adapting the net to one’s purposes. In B. D. Loader (Ed.), Young citizens in the digital age political engagement, young people and new media (pp. 68–81). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. De Singly, F. (Ed.). (2004). Enfants-adultes: Vers une égalité de statuts? Paris: Universalis.Google Scholar
  27. De Singly, F. (2007). Sociologie de la famille contemporaine. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  28. Eron, L. D., & Huesmann, L. R. (1980). Adolescent aggression and television. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 347, 319–331.Google Scholar
  29. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fiske, J. (1992). The cultural economy of fandom. In L. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 420–434). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Frau-Meigs, D. (2004). La réglementation des contenus à la télévision: enjeux et limites des solutions actuelles. Questions de communication, hors série “Télévision, justice, regulation”.Google Scholar
  33. Frau-Meigs, D. (2006). Media regulation, self-regulation and education: Debunking some myths and retooling some working paradigms. In C. Von Feilitzen (Ed.), Regulation, awareness, empowerment. Young people and harmful media content in the digital age (pp. 83–100). Nordicom: Goteborg University.Google Scholar
  34. Frau-Meigs, D. (2007). Qui a détourné le 11 septembre? Information et démocratie aux Etats-Unis. Bruxelles et Paris: De Boeck Université/INA.Google Scholar
  35. Frau-Meigs, D., & Jehel, S. (2003). Médias, Jeunes, Violence. Economica: Paris.Google Scholar
  36. Frau-Meigs, D. (2011a). Penser la société de l’écran. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne nouvelle.Google Scholar
  37. Frau-Meigs, D. (2011b). Socialisation des jeunes et éducation aux médias. Toulouse: Eres.Google Scholar
  38. Frau-Meigs, D. (2011c). Media matters in the cultural contradictions of the information society. Towards a human-rights based governance. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  39. Frau-Meigs, D., & Jehel, S. (1997). Les écrans de la violence. Enjeux économiques et responsabilités sociales. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  40. Frau-Meigs, D., & Meigs, D. J. (2009). Browser games and online safety. Global Media Journal Google Scholar
  41. Frau-Meigs, D., & Torrent, J. (Eds.). (2009). Mapping media education policies worldwide. New York: UN Alliance of Civilisations and UNESCO.Google Scholar
  42. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  43. Gerbner, G. (1986). The symbolic context of action and communication. In R. L. Rosnow & M. Georgoudi (Eds.), Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science (pp. 251–268). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  44. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television. The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199.Google Scholar
  45. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The ‘mainstreaming’ of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29.Google Scholar
  46. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17–40). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Gerrig, R. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Goldman, S., Booker, A., & McDermott, M. (2008). Mixing the digital, social, and cultural: Learning, identity, and agency in youth participation. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 185–206). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Gonnet, J. (2003). Les médias et la curiosité du monde. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  50. Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323, 69–71.Google Scholar
  51. Greenfield, P. M., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2012). Digital media and youth: Games, internet and development. In D. Singer & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed., pp. 75–96). London/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75–90.Google Scholar
  53. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  55. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Hodkinson, P. (2007). Youth cultures: A critical outline of key debates. In P. Hodkinson & W. Deicke (Eds.), Youth culture: Scenes, subcultures and tribes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Huntemann, N., & Morgan, M. (2012). Mass media and identity development. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Huston, A. C., Wartella, E., & Donnerstein, E. (1998). Measuring the effects of sexual content in the media. Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  59. Jacquinot, G. (Ed.). (2002). Les jeunes et les médias. Perspectives de recherche dans le monde. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  60. Jehel, S. (2010). Parents, médias: Qui éduque les pré-adolescents? Toulouse: Eres.Google Scholar
  61. Jenkins, J. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Johnson, J., et al. (2002). Television viewing and aggressive behavior during adolescence and adulthood. Science, 295, 2468–2471.Google Scholar
  63. Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (1992). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of “Dallas”. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Kotilainen, S. (2009). Promoting youth civic participation with media production: The case of youth voice editorial board. In D. Frau-Meigs & J. Torrent (Eds.), Mapping media education policies in the world. New York: United Nations Alliance of Civilizations.Google Scholar
  65. Kotilainen, S., & Rantala, L. (2009). From seekers to activists: Youth civic identities in relations to media. Information, Communication & Society, 12(5), 658–677.Google Scholar
  66. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197–233). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media. Childhood and the changing media environment. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Livingstone, S., Couldry, N., & Markham, T. (2007). Youthful steps towards civic participation: does the Internet help? In B. D. Loader (Ed.), Political engagement, young people and the Internet (pp. 21–34). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Livingstone, S., & Lievrouw, L. (2006). Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Mares, M. L. (1996). Source confusion and cultivation. Human Communication Research, 23(2), 278–297.Google Scholar
  72. McChesney, R. (1998). The political economy of global media. Media and Development, 45(4), 3–8.Google Scholar
  73. McKenna and Bargh (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–90.Google Scholar
  74. McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  75. Millwood Hargrave, A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Harm and offence in media content: A review of the evidence. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  76. Mondzain, M.-J. (2002). L’image peut-elle tuer ? Paris: Bayard.Google Scholar
  77. Montgomery, K. C. (2001). Digital kids: The new online children’s consumer culture. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 635–650). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  78. Montgomery, K.C. (2012). Safeguards for youth in the digital marketing ecosystem. In Singer & Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children in the media (pp. 631–648).Google Scholar
  79. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80–97.Google Scholar
  80. Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). Making MOOsic: The development of personal relationships on-line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517–538.Google Scholar
  81. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59(3), 407–433.Google Scholar
  82. Potter, W. J. (2003). The 11 myths on media violence. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. Potter, W. J., & Warren, R. (1996). Considering policies to protect children from TV violence. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 116–138.Google Scholar
  84. Rideout, V. J., Vandewater, V. J., & Wartella, E. A. (2003). Zero to six: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  85. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., & Monahan, J. (2007). Communication and social cognition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  86. Rowland, W. (1983). The politics of TV violence: Policy uses of communication research. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Sefton-Green, J., & Sinker, R. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Shanahan, J., & Morgan, M. (1999). Television and its viewers cultivation theory and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Shrum, L. J. (1995). Assessing the social influence of television: A social cognition perspective on cultivation effects. Communication Research, 22, 402–429.Google Scholar
  90. Signorielli, N. (1989). Television and conceptions about sex roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo. Sex Roles, 21, 341–360.Google Scholar
  91. Silverstone, R. (2005). The sociology of mediation and communication. In C. J. Calhoun, C. R. Bryan, & S. Turner (Eds.), The sage handbook of sociology (pp. 187–207). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  92. Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.). (2001). Make-believe: Games and activities to foster imaginative play in children. Washington, DC: Magination.Google Scholar
  93. Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  94. Sirota, R. (2006). Eléments pour une sociologie de l’enfance. Rennes: Presse universitaire de Rennes.Google Scholar
  95. Solove, D. G. (2008). Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. L. (1977). Constructing social problems. Cummings: Menlo Park.Google Scholar
  97. Spigel, L. (1992). Make room for TV. Television and the family ideal in postwar America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Stern, S. (2004). Expressions of identity online: Prominent features and gender differences in adolescents’ world wide Web home pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(2), 218–243.Google Scholar
  99. Tichi, C. (1991). Electronic hearth: Creating an American television culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  101. Turkle, S. (2010). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  102. UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: an overview of child well-being in rich countries, Innocenti Report Card 7. Accessed 1 Jan 2012.
  103. Valkenburg, P. M., & Cantor, J. (2001). The development of a child into a consumer. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 61–72.Google Scholar
  104. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyper-personal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.Google Scholar
  105. Wartella, E. (2012). Children and interactive media. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  106. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don’t ride alone. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167–194). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Wellman, B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J., & Hampton K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplementsocialcapital? American Behavioral Science, 45, 436–455.Google Scholar
  108. Wellman, B., & Haythornwhite (eds) (2002). The internet in everyday life. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  109. Whitaker, R. C., & Burdette, H. L. (2005). Resurrecting free play in young children: Looking beyond fitness and fatness to attention, affiliation, and affect. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(1), 46–50.Google Scholar
  110. Whitty, M., & Gavin, J. (2000). Age/sex/location: Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour, 4(5), 623–630.Google Scholar
  111. Williams, D., Consalvo, M., Kaplan, S., & Yee, N. (2009). Looking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of Communication, 59, 700–725.Google Scholar
  112. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finklehor, D. (2003). Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1), 105–119.Google Scholar
  113. Woodhead, M., & Montgomery, H. (Eds.). (2003). Understanding childhood: An interdisciplinary approach. London: Open University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media Sociology and English DepartmentUniversity Sorbonne Nouvelle, PRES Sorbonne Paris-CitéParisFrance

Personalised recommendations