Sociology: Societal Structure, Development of Childhood, and the Well-Being of Children

Abstract

A structural approach to childhood hardly existed prior to the so-called social studies of childhood. A structural approach to childhood is not about the individual child and his/her development; it is about the (historical) development of childhood. Childhood is understood as a structural form or pattern determined by societal parameters, such as economy, politics, and technology. In this understanding, childhood is a permanent feature, even though it changes in time and space. As a structural form, childhood is a segment of the generational order, that is, it relates to adulthood and old age. It is important to distinguish between primary relationships between generations (e.g., within family and/or locality) and structural relations between generational segments. Historically, childhood has developed as a result of changing economic circumstances and has experienced a growing distance to other generational segments. The well-being of children as a collectivity is partly a political issue; children do not have a political constituency of their own; yet, childhood is an object of immense interest to various partners, most recently reflected in the social investment movement, the anticipatory concern of which coincides with that of traditional psychology and sociology. This chapter suggests that childhood is a minority group, the subjection of which through its corresponding (generational) dominance group has clear paternalistic attributes.

Keywords

Social Study Generational Unit Societal Level Public Issue Structural Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. A League Table of Child Maltreatment Deaths in Rich Countries (2003). Innocenti report card, Issue No. 5. UNICEF: Florence.Google Scholar
  2. Abrams, P. (1982). Historical sociology. Somerset: Open Books.Google Scholar
  3. Alanen, L. (1994). Gender and generation: Feminism and the ‘Child Question’. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 27–42). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  4. Alanen, L. (2009). Generational order. In J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 159–74). Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Ambert, A.-M. (1986). Sociology of sociology: The place of children in North American sociology. Sociological Studies of the Child Development: A Research Annual, 7(11–31).Google Scholar
  6. Andresen, S. (2006). Sozialistische Kindheitskonzepte: Politische Einflüsse auf die Erziehung. München/Basel: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  8. Ariès, P. (1990). Ein Sontagshistoriker: Philippe Ariès über sich. Frankfurt/M: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
  9. Benjamin, W. (1929/1969). Über Kinder, Jugend und Erziehung. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  10. Blackstone, W. (1979). Commentaries on the Law of England (Vol. 1). (a facsimile of the first edition of 1765–9). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blake, J. (1981). Family size and the quality of children. Demography, 18(4), 421–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boulding, E. (1979). Children’s rights and the wheel of life. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  13. Brunner, O. (1980). Vom ‘ganzen Haus’ zur ‘Familie’ im 17. Jahrhundert. In H. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Seminar: Familie und Gesellschaftsstruktur (pp. 83–92). Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Buisson, F., & Durkheim É. (1979). Childhood. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim: essays on morals and education (trans: H. L. Sutcliffe) (pp. 149–154). London/Boston/Henley: Routledge/Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  15. Buisson, F., & Durkheim, É. (1911). Enfance. In Nouveau Dictionnaire de pédagogie et dinstruction primaire, published under the direction of F. Buisson (pp. 52–53). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge/London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coleman, J. S. (1993). The rational reconstruction of society: 1992 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 58(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corsaro, W. A. (1985). Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  19. Corsaro, W. A. (2009). Peer culture. In J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 301–15). Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Corsaro, W. A. (2011). The sociology of childhood (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dahrendorf, R. (2006). Citizenship and social class. In M. Bulmer & A. M. Rees (Eds.), Citizenship today: The contemporary relevance of T. H. Marshall (pp. 25–48). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, K. (1937). Reproductive institutions and the pressure for population. The Sociological Review, 29(3), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis, K. (1940). The child and the social structure. Journal Educational Sociology, 14(4), 217–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. deMause, L. (1974). The evolution of childhood. In L. deMause (Ed.), The history of childhood (pp. 1–73). New York: The Psychohistory Press.Google Scholar
  25. Devereux, G. (1970). Two types of modal personality models. In N. J. Smelser & W. T. Smelser (Eds.), Personality and social systems (2nd ed., pp. 27–37). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Dreitzel, H. P. (Ed.). (1973). Childhood and socialization. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Durkheim, É. ([1925] 2002). Moral education. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Elder, Jr., G. H. ([1974] 1999). Children of the great depression: Social change in life experience. 25th anniversary edition. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  29. Elder, G. H., Jr., Modell, J., & Parke, R. D. (1993). Epilogue: An emerging framework for dialogue between history and developmental psychology. In G. H. Elder Jr., J. Modell, & R. D. Parke (Eds.), Children in time and place: Developmental and historical insights (pp. 241–49). Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Esping-Andersen, G. (2002). A child-centred social investment strategy. In G. Esping-Andersen, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, & J. Myles (Eds.), Why we need a new welfare state (pp. 26–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Esping-Andersen, G., & Sarasa, S. (2002). The generational conflict reconsidered. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frønes, I. (2005). Structuration of childhood: An essay on the structuring of childhood and anticipatory socialisation. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Studies in modern childhood: Society, agency and culture (pp. 267–82). Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gans, H. (1978). Deciding what’s news: A study of the CBS evening news, NBC nighthly news, newsweek, and time. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  36. Garbarino, J. (1986). Can American families afford the luxury of childhood? Child Welfare, 65(2), 119–140.Google Scholar
  37. Giddens, A. (1999). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gross, B. (1980). Friendly fascism: The new face of power in America. Montréal: Black Rose.Google Scholar
  39. Hardman, C. ([1973] 2001). Can there be an anthropology of children? Childhood, 8(4), 501–17.Google Scholar
  40. Heckman, J. (2009). Investing in our young people: Lessons from economics and psychology. Rivista Internazionale di scienze soziali, 117(3–4), 365–86.Google Scholar
  41. Hengst, H. (1981). Tendenzen der Liquidierung von Kindheit. In H. Hengst (Ed.), Kindheit als Fiktion (pp. 11–72). Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  42. Hengst, H. (1987). The liquidation of childhood: An objective tendency. International Journal of Sociology, 17(3), 58–80. (A shortened English version of Hengst 1981).Google Scholar
  43. Hinrichs, K. (2002). Do the old exploit the young? If so is enfranchising children a good idea? Archives europénnes de sociologie, 43(1), 35–58.Google Scholar
  44. Hollingshead, A. B. (1949). Elmtown’s youth: The impact of social classes on adolescents. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Honig, M.-S., Leu, H. R., & Nissen, U. (1996). Kindheit als Sozialisationsphase und als kulturelles Muster. In M.-S. Honig, H. R. Leu, & U. Nissen (Eds.), Kinder und Kindheit. Soziokulturelle Muster – sozialisationstheoretische Perspectiven (pp. 9–29). Weinheim/München: Juventa.Google Scholar
  46. Hood-Williams, J. (1990). Patriarchy for children: On the stability of power relations in children’s lives. In L. Chisholm et al. (Eds.), Childhood, youth and social change: A comparative perspective (pp. 155–171). Basingstoke: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  47. Humphries, S. (1995). Hooligans or rebels? An oral history of working class childhood and youth 1889–1939. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  49. James, P.D. (1992) The Children of Men. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  50. Jenks, C. (1982). Constituting the child. In C. Jenks (Ed.), Sociology of childhood: Essential readings (pp. 9–24). London: Batsford Academic an Educational.Google Scholar
  51. Jensen, A.-M., & Saporiti, A. (1992). Do children count? Childhood as a social phenomenon: A statistical compendium. Eurosocial report 36/17. Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research.Google Scholar
  52. Kanitz, F.-X. (1925). Das proletarische Kind in der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Jena: Urania-Verlags-Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
  53. Kaufmann, F.-X. (1990). Zukunft der Familie. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  54. Kaufmann, F.-X. (1996). Modernisierungsschübe, Familie und Sozialstaat. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar
  55. Kaufmann, F.-X. (2005). Schrumpfende Gesellschaft: Vom Bevölkeruingsrückgang und seinen Folgen. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  56. Key, E. (1900). Barnets århundrade: studie (The century of the child: a study). Stockholm: Bonniers førlag.Google Scholar
  57. Krüsselberg, H.-G. (1979). Vitalvermögenspolitik und die Einheit des Sozialbudgets: die ökonomische Perspektive der Sozialpolitik für das Kind. In K. Lüscher (Ed.) Sozialpolitik für das Kind (pp. 143–79). Frankfurt/M.: Klett-Cotta im Verlag Ullstein.Google Scholar
  58. Krüsselberg, H.-G. (1987). Vital capital policy and the unity of the social budget: Economic prospects of a social policy for the child. International Journal of Sociology, 17(3), 81–97. (A shortened English version of Krüsselberg 1979).Google Scholar
  59. Kuznets, S. (1989). Economic development, the family, and income distribution: Selected essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lasch, C. (1992, October). Hilary Clinton, Child Saver. Harpers Magazine, 74–82.Google Scholar
  62. Levine, D. P. (1995). Wealth and freedom: An introduction to political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lister, R. (2003). Investing in the citizen-workers of the future: Transformations in citizenship and the state under new labour. Social Policy & Administration, 37(5), 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mackenroth, G. (1952). Die Reform der Sozialpolitik durch einen deutschen Sozialplan. In Schriften des Vereins für Sozialpolitik: Gesellschaft für Wirthschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. Neue Folge, Band 4. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
  65. Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Marx, K. (1963 [1852]). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. Mayall, B. (1996). Children, health and the social order. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. Garden City: Published for The American Museum of Natural History, Natural History Press/Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
  69. Mierendorff, J. (2010). Kindheit und Wohlfahrtsstaat: Entstehung, Wandel und Kontinuität des Musters moderner Kindheit. Weinheim/München: Juventa.Google Scholar
  70. Mills, C. W. (1961). The sociological imagination. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  71. Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces: Public policy, children and childhood. London/New York: Routledge Farmer.Google Scholar
  72. Myles, J., & Quadagno, J. (2000). Envisioning a Third Way: The welfare state in the twenty-first century. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 156–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Offe, C. (1993). Zusatzstimmen für Eltern (KiVi): ein Beitrag zur Reform von Demokratie und Wahlrecht? (p. 19). Bremen: Mimeo.Google Scholar
  74. Oldman, D., et al. (1994). Adult-child relations as class relations. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Childhood matters. Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 43–58). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  75. Olk, T. (2007). Kinder im ‘Sozialinvestitionsstaat’. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 27(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  76. Platt, A. M. (2009). The child savers: The invention of delinquency. Expanded 40th Anniversary Edition. New Brunswick/New Jersey/London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Pollock, L. (1983). Forgotten children: Parent–child relations from 1500 to 1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Postman, N. (1982). The disappearance of childhood. London: W.H. Allen.Google Scholar
  79. Preston, S. H. (1984). Children and the elderly: Divergent paths for America’s dependents. Demography, 21(4), 435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Preuss-Lausitz, U., et al. (1983). Kriegskinder, Konsumkinder, Krisenkinder. Zur Sozialgeschichte seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Beltz: Weinheim and Basel.Google Scholar
  81. Prout, A., & James, A. (1990). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 7–34). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  82. Qvortrup, J. (1985). Placing children in the division of labour. In P. Close & R. Collins (Eds.), Family and economy in modern society (pp. 129–45). Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  83. Qvortrup, J. (1990). A voice for children in statistical and social accounting: A plea for children’s righs to be heard. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 78–98). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  84. Qvortrup, J. (1993). Nine theses about ‘Childhood as a Social Phenomenon’. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.) Childhood as a social phenomenon: Lessons from an international project (pp. 11–18). Eurosocial report 47. Vienna: European Centre.Google Scholar
  85. Qvortrup, J. (1994). Childhood matters: An introduction. In J. Qvortrup et al. (Eds.), Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 1–23). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  86. Qvortrup, J. (1995). From useful to useful: The historical continuity in children’s constructive participation. In A. Anne-Marie (Ed.), Sociological studies of children (pp. 49–76). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  87. Qvortrup, J. (2009). Childhood as a structural form. In J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 21–33). Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  88. Qvortrup, J. (2010). A tentação da diversidade – e seus riscos. In Educação & Sociedade 31(113), 1121–36. (First given as ‘Diversity’s Temptation – and Hazards’. A key note to the 2nd international conference: Re-presenting childhood and youth. 8th-10th July 2008. Centre for the Study of Childhood and Youth, University of Sheffield).Google Scholar
  89. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Richards, M. P. M. (Ed.). (1974). The integration of a child into a social world. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Rühle, O. (1911). Das proletarische kind. München: A. Langen.Google Scholar
  92. Rühle, O. (1925). Die Seele des proletarischen Kindes. Dresden: Otto Rühle.Google Scholar
  93. Seligman, E. R. A. (ed. with A. Johnson) (1930–1933). Encyclopaedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  94. Sgritta, G. B. ([1987] 2009). Childhood: Normalization and project. In Sociological studies of children and youth, (Vol. 12, pp. 287–304). Special issue on Structural, Historical, and Comparative Perspectives, guest editor J. Qvortrup.Google Scholar
  95. Sgritta, G. B., & Saporiti, A. (1989). Myth and reality in the discovery and representation of childhood. In P. Close (Ed.), Family divisions and inequalities in modern societies (pp. 92–111). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  96. Shorter, E. (1975). The making of the modern family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  97. Sills, D. L. (Ed.) (1968). International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  98. Smelser, N. L., & Baltes, P. (2001). International encyclopedia of social & behavioral sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  99. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1986). The deep structure or moral categories, eighteenth-century French stratification, and the revolution. In A. L. Stinchcombe (Ed.), Stratification and organization. Selected papers (pp. 145–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stone, L. (1975). The family, sex and marriage in England 1500–1800. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  101. Suransky, V. P. (1982). The Erosion of childhood. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  102. Thorne, B. (1985). ‘Putting a price on children’. Review article on V.A. Zelizer’s pricing the priceless child. Contemporary Sociology, 14(6) November.Google Scholar
  103. Thorne, B. (1987). Re-visioning women and social change: Where are the children? Gender and Society, 1(1), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Turmel, A. (2008). A historical sociology of childhood: Developmental thinking, categorization and graphic visualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wintersberger, H. (1994). Costs and benefits: The economics of childhood. In J. Qvortrup et al. (Eds.), Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 213–47). Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  106. Wirth, L. (1945). The problem of minority groups. In R. Linton (Ed.), The science of man in the world crisis (pp. 347–72). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Woodhead, M. (1990). Psychology and the cultural construction of children’s needs. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 60–77). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  108. Woodhead, M. (2009). Child development and the development of childhood. In J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 46–61). Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.Google Scholar
  109. Zeiher, H. (1996). Kinder in der Gesellschaft und Kindheit in der Soziologie. Zeitschrift für Sozialisationssforschung und Erziehungssoziologie, 16(1), 26–46.Google Scholar
  110. Zelizer, V. A. (1985). Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  111. Zelizer, V. A. (2005). The priceless child revisited. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Studies in modern childhood: Society, agency and culture (pp. 184–200). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  112. Zuckerman, M. (2003). Epilogue: The millennium of childhood that stretches before us. In W. Koops & M. Zuckerman (Eds.), Beyond the century of the child: Cultural history and developmental psychology (pp. 225–42). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Political ScienceNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations