Children’s Well-Being and Interpretive Reproduction

  • William A. Corsaro


This chapter examines children’s well-being from the perspective of interpretive reproduction. The term interpretive captures the innovative and creative aspects of children’s participation in society. Children create and participate in their own peer cultures by creatively appropriating information from the adult world to address their own peer concerns. In examining children’s well-being from the perspective of interpretive reproduction, there is concentration on children themselves and especially their agency in their collective actions with adults and each other. This chapter maintains that children contribute to their own well-being as early as the first years of life and create highly complex peer cultures in the preschool and preadolescent years. This chapter highlights routines such as sociodramatic role-play, fantasy play, the protection of interactive space, and approach-avoidance play in the culture of preschool children to capture how children’s collectively shared activities contributed especially to their social and emotional well-being. This chapter argues that in their more reflective and emotional friendship processes, their complex games and lore, and their disputes and conflicts, preadolescents collectively build solidarity in their peer relations while also developing advanced self-concepts and personal identities. This chapter also stresses that preadolescent peer cultures are often stratified by gender and status which affects well-being in complex ways both positive and negative. Finally, this chapter maintains that the well-being of preschool children and more especially preadolescents and adolescents is becoming more intricately interwoven with their experiences with the electronic media.


Preschool Child Interactive Space Walk Away Preadolescent Child Participant Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, L. (1992). Children as chattel. In E. West & P. Petrick (Eds.), Small worlds: Children and adolescents in America (pp. 208–231). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  4. Ambert, A. (1995). Toward a theory of peer abuse. Sociological Studies of Children, 7, 177–205.Google Scholar
  5. Asher, S., & Coie, J. (Eds.). (1990). Peer rejection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barlow, K. (1985). Play and learning in a Sepik society. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American anthropological association. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, M. M., & Vangelisti, A. (1995). Speaking in a double-voice: Role-making as influence in preschoolers’ fantasy play situations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 351–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belskey, J., & Rovine, M. (1988). Nonmaternal care in the first year of life and the security of infant-parents attachment. Child Development, 59, 1157–1167.Google Scholar
  9. Bieman, K. (2003). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Blurton-Jones, N (Ed.) (1976). Rough-and-tumble play among nursery school children. In J. Bruner, A. Jolly & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 352–363). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Boyd, D. (2010). Friendship. In M. Ito et al. (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media (pp. 79–115). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chin, T., & Phillips, M. (2003). Just play?: A framework for analyzing children’s time use. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 9, 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke-Stewart, A. (1989). Infant day care: Maligned or malignant? American Psychologist, 44, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corsaro, W. (1979). “We’re friends, right?”: Children’s use of access rituals in a nursery school. Language in Society, 8, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corsaro, W. (1985). Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  16. Corsaro, W. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in children’s peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corsaro, W. (1993). Interpretive reproduction in children’s role play. Childhood, 1, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corsaro, W. (1994). Discussion, debate, and friendship: Peer discourse in nursery schools in the US and Italy. Sociology of Education, 67, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corsaro, W. (2003). “We’re friends, right?” Inside Kids’ Culture. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  20. Corsaro, W. (2009). Peer culture. In J. Qvortrup, W. Corsaro, & M. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of child studies (pp. 301–315). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  21. Corsaro, W. (2011). The sociology of childhood (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  22. Corsaro, W., & Eder, D. (1990). Children’s peer cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corsaro, W., & Johannesen, B. O. (2007). The creation of new cultures in peer interaction. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 444–459). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Corsaro, W., & Molinari, L. (1990). From seggiolini to discussion: The generation and extension of peer culture among Italian preschool children. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davies, B. (1982). Life in the classroom and playground: The accounts of primary school children. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. Drotner, K. (2009). Children and digital media: Online, on site, on the go. In J. Qvortrup, W. Corsaro, & S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of child studies (pp. 360–373). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  27. Drotner, K., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.). (2008). The international handbook of children, media, and culture. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Eder, D. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Eder, D., & Nenga, S. (2003). Socialization in adolescence. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 157–182). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  30. Edwards, C. (2000). Children’s play in cross-cultural perspective: A new look at the sick cultures study. Cross-Cultural Research, 34, 318–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ellis, S., Rogoff, B., & Cromer, C. (1981). Age segregation in children’s social interaction. Developmental Psychology, 17, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Evaldsson, A. (1993). Play, disputes and social order: Everyday life in two swedish after-school centers. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
  33. Evaldsson, A. (2003). Throwing like a girl?: Situating gender differences in physicality across game contexts. Childhood, 10, 475–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fine, G. A. (1987). With the boys: Little league baseball and preadolescent culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Formanek-Brunell, M. (1992). Sugar and spite: The politics of doll play in nineteenth-century America. In E. West & P. Petrik (Eds.), Small worlds: Children and adolescents in America, 1850–1950 (pp. 107–124). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  36. Freeman, N., & Brown, M. (2004). Reconceptualizing rough and tumble play: Ban the banning. In S. Reifel & M. Brown (Eds.), Social contexts of early education, and reconceptualizing play (Vol. II, pp. 219–234). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fromberg, D., & Bergen, D. (2006). Play from birth to twelve: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings (2nd ed.). New York: Routlege.Google Scholar
  38. Frønes, I. (1995). Among peers: On the meaning of peers in the process of socialization. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gandini, L. & Edwards, C. (Eds.) (2001). Bambini: The Italian approach to infant/toddler care. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  40. Garvey, C. (1984). Children’s talk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Goldman, L. (2000). Child’s play: Myth, mimesis, and make-believe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Göncü, A., & Gaskins, S. (Eds.). (2006). Play and development: Evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Goodwin, M. (1985). The serious side of jump rope: Conversational practices and social organization in the frame of play. Folklore, 98, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goodwin, M. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Goodwin, M. (1998). Games of stance: Conflict and footing in hopscotch. In S. Hoyle & C. Adger (Eds.), Kids talk: Strategic language use in later childhood (pp. 23–46). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Goodwin, M. (2006). The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grant, L. (1984). Gender roles and statuses in school children’s peer interactions. Western Sociological Review, 14, 58–76.Google Scholar
  49. Hanawalt, B. (1993). Growing up in medieval London. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ito, M., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. James, A. (2009). Agency. In J. Qvortrup, W. Corsaro, & M. Honig (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of child studies (pp. 34–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  52. Johannesen, B. O. (2004). On shared experiences and intentional actions emerging within a community of lego-playing children. Paper presented at the third international conference on the dialogical self. Warsaw.Google Scholar
  53. Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (Eds.). (2001). Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Katriel, T. (1985). Brogez: Ritual and strategy in Israeli children’s conflicts. Language in Society, 16, 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Katriel, T. (1987). “Bexibùdim!”: Ritualized sharing among Israeli children. Language in Society, 16, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Katz, C. (2004). Growing up global: Economic restructuring and children’s everyday lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kelle, H. (2000). Gender and territoriality in games played by nine-to twelve-year-old schoolchildren. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29, 164–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kinney, D. (1993). From nerds to normals: The recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 66, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kupersmidt, J., & Dodge, K. (Eds.). (2004). Children’s peer relations: From development to intervention to policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  60. Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting. Pew internet & American life project. Washington, DC: Pew/Internet. Retrieved March 22, 2010∼/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Writing_Report_FINAL3.pdf.pdf.
  61. Lesko, N. (2001). Act your age! A cultural construction of adolescence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Ling, R. (2007). Children, youth, and mobile communication. Journal of Children and Media, 1, 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ling, R., & Haddon, L. (2008). Children, youth, and the mobile phone. In K. Drotner & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The international handbook of children, media, and culture (pp. 137–151). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Livingstone, S. (2007). Do the media harm children?: Reflections on new approaches to an old problem. Journal of Children and Media, 1, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Löfdahl, A. (2005). The funeral: A study of children’s shared meaning-making and its developmental significance. Early Years, 25, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Løkken, G. (2000). The playful quality of the toddling “style.”. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Maccoby, E. (1999). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Maynard, D. (1985). On the functions of social conflict among children. American Sociological Review, 50, 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McDowell, J. (1979). Children’s riddling. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Milner, M. (2006). Freaks, geeks, and cool kids. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2003). Does amount of time spent in child care predict socioemotional adjustment during the transition to kindergarten? Child Development, 74, 976–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. New York Times (2010, March 25). Prosecutors gone wild, p. A30.Google Scholar
  73. Nsamenang, B. (2006). Human ontogenesis: An indigenous African view on development and intelligence. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nsamenang, B. (2010). The importance of mixed-age groups in Cameroon. In M. Kernan & E. Singer (Eds.), Peer relationships in early childhood education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Oxford, UK: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  76. Opie, I., & Opie, P. (1959). The lore and language of schoolchildren. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Opie, I., & Opie, P. (1969). Children’s games in street and playground. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  78. Paley, V. (1992). You can’t say, you can’t play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Pascoe, C. J. (2010). Intimacy. In M. Ito et al. (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media (pp. 117–148). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  80. Pellegrini, Q., & Smith, P. (1998). Physical active play: The nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Development, 69, 577–598.Google Scholar
  81. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  82. Ramsey, P. (1991). Making friends in school: Promoting peer relationships in early childhood. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  83. Richert, S. (1990). Boys and girls apart: Children's play in Canada and Poland. Ottowa, Canada: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M 2 : Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved February 27, 2010
  85. Rizzo, T. (1989). Friendship development among children in school. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  86. Roopnarine, J., Johnson, J., & Hooper, F. (Eds.). (1994). Children’s play in diverse cultures. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  87. Rossetti-Ferreira, C., Oliveira, Z., Campos-de-Crvalho, M., & Amorim, K. (2010). Peer relations in Brazilian daycare centres. In M. Kernan & E. Singer (Eds.), Peer relationships in early childhood education (pp. 74–87). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Sawyer, C. K. (1997). Pretend play as improvisation: Conversation in the preschool classroom. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  89. Sawyer, C. K. (2002). Improvisation and narrative. Narrative Inquiry, 12, 319–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schwartzman, H. (1978). Transformations: The anthropology of children’s play. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  91. Simmons, R. (2002). Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  92. Strandell, H. (1994). What are children doing? Activity profiles in day care centres. Paper presented at the XIII congress of sociology, Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  93. Strandell, H. (1997). Doing reality with play: Play as a children’s resource in organizing everyday life in daycare centres. Childhood, 4, 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tannock, M. (2010). Rough and tumble play in early childhood settings: Challenges for personnel training. In E. Nwokah (Ed.), Play as engagement and communication (pp. 143–164). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  95. Thompson, M., O’Neill, C., & Cohen, L. (2001). Best friends, worst enemies: Understanding the social lives of children. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  96. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Tucker, E. (2008). Children’s Folklore: A handbook. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  98. Underwood, M. (2003). Social aggression in girls. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  99. Voss, L. (1997). Teasing, disputing, and playing: Cross-gender interactions and space utilization among first and third graders. Gender and Society, 11, 238–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Whiting, B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds: The formation of social behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Wiggins, D. (1985). The play of slave children in the plantation communities of the old South, 1820–60. In N. Hiner & J. Hawes (Eds.), Growing up in America: Children in historical perspective (pp. 173–192). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  102. Willis, P. (1990). Common culture. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  103. Wiseman, R. (2002). Queen bees & wannabes: Helping your daughter survive cliques, gossip, boyfriends, and other realities of adolescence. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  104. Zinnecker, J. (1998). Perpetrators of school violence: A longitudinal study of bullying in German schools. In M. Watts (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on youth and violence (pp. 187–203). Stamford: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations