Mixed Methods in Research on Child Well-Being

Reference work entry

Abstract

In this chapter we review the benefits of using mixed qualitative/quantitative methods for research on child well-being. We argue that the combination of quantitative and qualitative modes of inquiry can often enrich our understanding of child development and well-being substantially beyond what either mode offers alone. We offer three case examples – the study of contextual influences on child development, including interventions; the study of reciprocal relationships between parent and child characteristics and contextual characteristics; and the study of children’s health – in which the integration of these methods has usefully informed developmental science and influenced child well-being. We also discuss some of the challenges and obstacles to the use of mixed methods on child well-being, and the solutions to some of these challenges. First, the design of mixed-methods studies often requires some additional effort and planning in research design, sampling, and data collection. Second, mixed-methods research offers some challenges to research participants’ engagement and involvement. Third, after data collection is over, mixed-methods research can generate data that may require boundary-crossing analyses to integrate and summarize. Finally, when the study reaches the writing stage, there can be difficulties in locating appropriate publishing outlets. We review solutions to these challenges based on evidence from prior successful mixed-methods studies in this field. In the conclusion, we offer future directions in the application of mixed methods in research on child well-being.

Keywords

Mixed Method African American Mother Family Routine Developmental Science Child Separation Anxiety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akinbami, L. J. (2006). The state of childhood asthma, United States, 1980–2005. Advance data from vital and health statistics, 381, 1–23.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2005). The vitality criterion. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axinn, W. G., & Pearce, L. D. (2006). Mixed method data collection strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barata, M. C., Yuan, M., Yoshikawa, H., Narea, M., Tamis-Lemonda, C. (in prep). Time to care: A mixed-methods study on the child care timing choices and preferences with immigrant and ethnically diverse low-income families. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Brandon, P. D. (2004). The child care arrangements of preschool-age children in immigrant families in the united states. International Migration, 42(1), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clampet-Lundquist, S., Edin, K., Kling, J., & Duncan, G. (2006). Moving at-risk teenagers out of high-risk neighborhoods: Why girls fare better than boys (Working Paper, Industrial Relations Section). Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  7. Clements, M. A., Reynolds, A. J., & Hickey, E. (2004). Site-level predictors of children’s school and social competence in the Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crosnoe, R. (2007). Early child care and the school readiness of children from Mexican immigrant Families. International Migration Review, 41(1), 152–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1999). Does head start help Hispanic children? Journal of Public Economics, 74(2), 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Kloet, E. R., Joëls, M., & Holsboer, F. (2005). Stress and the brain: From adaptation to disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(6), 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan, G. J., Huston, A. C., & Weisner, T. S. (2007). Higher ground: New hope for the working poor and their children. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., Spinrad, T. L., Valiente, C., Fabes, R. A., & Liew, J. (2005). Relations among positive parenting, children’s effortful control, and externalizing problems: A three-wave longitudinal study. Child Development, 76(5), 1055–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiese, B. H., & Bickham, N. L. (1998). Qualitative inquiry: An overview for pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 23(2), 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fiese, B. H., & Wamboldt, F. S. (2003). Tales of pediatric asthma management: Family-based strategies related to medical adherence and health care utilization. The Journal of Pediatrics, 143(4), 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiese, B. H., Wamboldt, F. S., & Anbar, R. D. (2005). Family asthma management routines: Connections to medical adherence and quality of life. The Journal of Pediatrics, 146(2), 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiese, B. H., Winter, M. A., Sliwinski, M., & Anbar, R. D. (2007). Nighttime waking in children with asthma: An exploratory study of daily fluctuations in family climate. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(1), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiese, B. H., Winter, M. A., Wamboldt, F. S., Anbar, R. D., & Wamboldt, M. Z. (2010). Do family mealtime interactions mediate the association between asthma symptoms and separation anxiety? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(2), 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuller, B., Holloway, S. D., & Liang, X. (1996). Family selection of child-care centers: The influence of household support, ethnicity, and parental practices. Child Development, 67, 3320–3337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. García Coll, C. (2005). Editorial. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 299–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gassman-Pines, A., & Yoshikawa, H. (2006). Five-year effects of an anti-poverty program on entry into marriage among never-married mothers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gassman-Pines, A., Yoshikawa, H., & Nay, S. (2006). Can money buy you love? Dynamic employment characteristics, the New Hope program and entry into marriage. In H. Yoshikawa, T. S. Weisner, & E. Lowe (Eds.), Making it work: Low-wage employment, family life, and children’s development (pp. 206–232). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  24. Gibson-Davis, C. M., & Duncan, G. J. (2005). Qualitative/quantitative synergies in a random assignment program. In T. Weisner (Ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children’s development: New methods in the study of childhood and family life (pp. 283–303). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Institute of Medicine [IOM] and National Research Council [NRC]. (2011). Toward an integrated science of research on families: Workshop report. Committee on the science of research on families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jacobs, M. P., & Fiese, B. H. (2007). Family mealtime interactions and overweight children with asthma: Potential for compounded risks? Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(1), 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2005). Bullets don’t got no name: Consequences of fear in the ghetto. In T. S. Weisner (Ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children’s development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life (pp. 243–282). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. LeVine, R. A. (2007). Ethnographic studies of childhood: A historical overview. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LeVine, R., Dixon, S., LeVine, S., Richman, A., Leiderman, P. H., Keefer, C. H., & Brazelton, T. B. (1994). Child care and culture. Lessons from Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang, X., Fuller, B., & Singer, J. D. (2000). Ethnic differences in child-care selection: The influence of family structure, parental practices, and home language. Early Education Research Quarterly, 15, 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Magnuson, K., Lahaie, C., & Waldfogel, J. (2006). Preschool and school readiness of children of immigrants. Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 1241–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markson, S., & Fiese, B. H. (2000). Family rituals as a protective factor for children with asthma. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 25(7), 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mensing, J. F., French, D., Fuller, B., & Kagan, S. L. (2000). Child care selection under welfare reform: How mothers balance work requirements and parenting. Early Education and Development, 11(5), 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mistry, R. S., Lowe, E. D., Benner, A. D., & Chien, N. (2008). Expanding the family economic stress model: Insights from a mixed-methods approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(1), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Institutes of Health Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (NIH OBSSR). (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. http://obssr.od.nih.gov/scientific_areas/methodology/mixed_methods_research/index.aspx. Accessed 17 Oct 2011.
  36. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Early child care and children’s development in the primary grades: Follow-up results from the NICHD study of early child care. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, and Duncan, G. J. (2003). Modeling the impacts of child care quality on children’s preschool cognitive development. Child Development, 74(5), 1454–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Small, M. L. (2009). ‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Society for Research in Child Development. (2005). Strategic plan. http://srcd.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=addb5e7d7d66625647754af3fandid=0d7ac77f02ande=cd4c747e66. Accessed 17 Sept 2011.
  40. Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (1997). The cultural structuring of child development. In J. Berry, P. R. Dasen, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 3–29). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  41. Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (2002). Culture structures the environment for development. Human Development, 45(4), 270–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weisner, T. S. (2002). Ecocultural understanding of children’s developmental pathways. Human Development, 45(4), 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weisner, T. S. (2005). Discovering successful pathways in children’s development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds: The formation of social behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Yoshikawa, H. (2011). Immigrants raising citizens: Undocumented parents and their young children. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Yoshikawa, H., Weisner, T. S., & Lowe, E. (Eds.) (2006). Making it work: Low-wage employment, family life, and child development. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IULLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Harvard Graduate School of EducationCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations