Abstract
Nyāya philosophy emerged when Akṣapāda Gautama (first century CE), credited with authoring the Nyāyasūtra, redacted ideas originating from Medhatithi Gautama (fifth century BCE). However, many of Medhatithi’s ideas were “reproduced” in the Caraka Saṃhitā about 78 CE (Vidyābhūṣaṇa History 25), indicating that concepts from both Medhatithi and Nyāya were in circulation well before Akṣapāda’s redaction – including elements of the five-part approach to reasoning called “the Nyāya method.” The Caraka Saṃhitā, though mostly about Ayurvedic medicine, includes a very focused debate manual bearing profound implications for the history and study of “comparative” rhetoric, which attempts to look beyond ancient Greece for other origins and interpretations of rhetoric. Early studies of Robert Oliver (Communication and culture in Ancient China and India. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. 1971) and George Kennedy (Comparative rhetoric : An historical and cross-cultural introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 1998) identified Indian forms of rhetorical practice found in ancient literature. However, the presence of rhetorical manuals and terminologies shows that India, though it did not develop a concept exactly like Greek rhetoric, not only practiced debate but created theories about it, leading to an entire school of philosophy. To expand the knowledge of rhetorical terminologies, approaches, and contexts in ancient India, this chapter traces the case-based rhetorical origins and concepts that became Nyāya philosophy, focusing upon the Caraka Saṃhitā, the Nyāyasūtra, and other ancient sources.
References
Aristotle’s Rhetoric. 2004. Trans. Roberts, W. Rhys. New York: Dover Publications. A Hypertext resource compiled by Lee Honeycut. Last modified: 9/27/11. http://rhetoric.eserver.org/aristotle/rhet1-1.html.
The Ashtavakra Gita. Trans. Thomas Byron. Boston: Shambala, 1990. Print.
The Bhagavad Gita. Trans. Juan Mascarό. New York: Penguin, 2003. Print.
Burnyeat, M.F. 1996. Enthymeme: Aristotle on the rationality of rhetoric. In Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric, ed. Amelie Oksenberg Rorty, 88–115. Berkeley: University of California Press. Print.
Daniell, Beth. 2014–2015. To the contrary. JAEPL. 20:52–59. Print.
The debate of king Milinda. Trans. Bhikkhu Basala. Buddha Dharma Education Association. Penang Malaysia: Inward Path, 2001. Web. www.buddhanet.net
Heilker, Paul. 2014–2015. Coming to non-violence. JAEPL 20:52–59. Print.
Ganeri, Jonardon. 2004. Indian logic. In Handbook of the history of logic, Greek, Indian, and Arabic Logic, ed. Dov M. Gambay and John Woods, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland. Print.
Ganeri, Jonardon. 2001. Philosophy in classical India. New York: Routledge. Print.
Jarratt, Susan. 1998. Rereading the sophists: classical rhetoric refigured. 1st Ed. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Kennedy, George A. 1998. Comparative rhetoric: An historical and cross-cultural introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Print.
Lloyd, Keith. 2007a. Rethinking rhetoric from an Indian perspective: Implications in the Nyāya Sutra. Rhetoric Review 26 (4): 365–384. Print.
Lloyd, Keith. 2007b. A rhetorical tradition lost in translation: Implications for rhetoric in the ancient Indian Nyāya Sutras. In Advances in the history of rhetoric, vol. 10. College Park: American Society for the History of Rhetoric. Print.
Lloyd, Keith. 2011. Culture and rhetorical patterns: Mining the rich relations between Aristotle’s enthymeme and example and India’s Nyāya method. Rhetorica 29 (1): 76–105. Print.
Lloyd, Keith. 2013. Learning from India’s Nyāya Rhetoric: Debating Analogically through Vāda’s Fruitful Dialogue. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43 (3): 285–299. Print.
Matilal, Bimal Krishna. 1985. Logic, language and reality. Indian philosophy and contemporary issues. Delhi: Motilal Benarsidass. Print.
Matilal, Bimal Krishna. 1998. In The character of logic in India, ed. Jonardon Ganeri and Heeraman Tiwari. New York: State University of New York Press. Print.
Mao, LuMing. 2003. Reflective encounters: Illustrating comparative rhetoric. Style 37 (4): 401–425. Print.
Oliver, Robert T. 1971. Communication and culture in Ancient China and India. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Print.
Perrett, Roy W. 1999. History, time and knowledge in Ancient India. History and Theory 38 (3): 307–321. http://www.jstor.org . 15 Oct 2005.
Poster, Carol. 1992. A historicist recontextualization of the enthymeme. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 22 (2): 1–24. JSTOR. Web. 31 May 2012.
The Upanisads. 2nd ed. Trans. Eknath Easwaran. Canada: Nilgiri Press, 2007. Print.
Vidyābhūsana, Satish Chandra. 1988. A history of Indian logic. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Print.
Vidyābhūsana, M. M. Satista Chandra. 1930, 1990. In The Nyāya Sutras of Gautama, ed. Nanda Lal Sinha. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. Print.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lloyd, K. (2017). Early Nyāya Logic: Rhetorical Aspects. In: Sarukkai, S. (eds) Handbook of Logical Thought in India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_9-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_9-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1812-8
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1812-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities