Skip to main content

General Introduction to Buddhist Logic

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Logical Thought in India
  • 169 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses some key concepts of Buddhist logic from different traditions. The first part deals with Nāgārjuna’s prasaṅga technique and his claim that reality is empty (śūnya). The idea that the claim that everything is empty, if true, might be regarded as empty itself is discussed. The second part provides an overview of Diṅnāga’s view on inference and his theory of the three conditions of an inferential sign (hetu). This theory is compared to the Nyāya view on inference and the question whether the second of Diṅnāga’s conditions is redundant is raised. The third part explores Dharmakīrti’s developments of Diṅnāga’s view on inference, particularly his introduction of the particle eva and the three types of hetu. The final part of this chapter presents an outline of Diṅnāga’s apoha (exclusion) theory of the meaning and function of concepts and words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Sources

  • Hetubindu by Dharmakīrti (texts and English translations):

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, P.P. 1997. Hetubindu of Dharmakīrti (a point on probans). Delhi: Sri Satguru Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkellner, E. 2016. Dharmakīrti’s Hetubindu, critically edited by Ernst Steinkellner on the basis of preparatory work by Helmut Krasser with a translation of the Gilgit fragment by Klaus Wille. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissensschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetucakraḍamaru (Hetucakranirṇaya) by Diṅnāga (text and English translation):

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, R.S.Y. 1969. Buddhist formal logic: A study of Dignāga’s Hetucakra and K’uei-chi’s great commentary on the Nyāyapraveśa. London: The Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (MMK) by Nāgarjuna (texts and English translations):

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J.L. 1995. The fundamental wisdom of the middle way. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inada, K. 1970. Nāgārjuna: A translation of his Mūlamadhyamakakārikā with an introductory essay. Tokyo: The Hokuseido Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalupahana, D. 1986. Mūlamadhyamakakārikā of Nāgārjuna: The philosophy of the middle way. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, repr. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, M., and S. Katsura. 2013. Nāgārjuna’s middle way. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streng, F. 1967. Emptiness: A study in religious meaning. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyāyabindu by Dharmakīrti (texts and English translations):

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay, M. 1971. Vinītadeva’s Nyāyabinduṭīkā. Calcutta: Indian Studies Past & Present.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stcherbatsky, Th. 1930. Buddhist logic. Vol. 2. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, repr. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyāyasūtra (NS) (texts and English translations):

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay, M. 1982. Gautama’s Nyāya-Sūtra with Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya. Calcutta: Indian Studies Past & Present.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, G. 1912–19. The Nyāya-Sūtras of Gautama, 4 Vols. Delhi: Motlal Banarsidass, repr. 1984 (includes a translation of the Nyāyavārtikka by Uddyotakara).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramāṇasamuccaya by Diṅnāga (texts and English translations):

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. 1988. Diṅnāga on the interpretation of signs. Vol. 9, Studies of classical India. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkellner, E. 2005. Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya, Chapter 1: A hypothetical reconstruction of the Sanskrit text with the help of the two Tibetan translations on the basis of the hitherto known Sanskrit fragments and the linguistic materials gained from Jinendrabuddhi’s Ṭīkā. http://www.ikga.oeaw.ac.at/Mat/dignaga_PS_1.pdf, with revisions of 2014: http://www.ikga.oeaw.ac.at/mediawiki/images/f/f3/Dignaga_PS_1_revision.pdf

  • Vigrahavyāvartanī (VV) by Nāgārjuna (text and English translation):

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, K., E.H. Johnston, and A. Kunst. 1978. The dialectical method of Nāgārjuna: Vigrahavyāvartanī. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, repr. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Jayatilleke, K.N. 1967. The logic of four alternatives. Philosophy East and West 17: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, B.K. 1986. Perception: An essay on classical Indian theories of knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, B.K. 1990. The word and the world. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, B.K. 2005. Epistemology, logic and grammar in Indian philosophical analysis. Edited by J. Ganeri. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. First published in 1971 by Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1843. A system of logic, in his Collected works. Vols. VII and VIII. Edited by J.M. Robson. London: Routledge, 1973, repr. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R.H. 1957. Some logical aspects of Nāgārjuna’s system. Philosophy East and West 6: 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joerg Tuske .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Tuske, J. (2017). General Introduction to Buddhist Logic. In: Sarukkai, S. (eds) Handbook of Logical Thought in India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_2-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_2-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1812-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1812-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics