Encyclopedia of Continuum Mechanics

Living Edition
| Editors: Holm Altenbach, Andreas Öchsner

Boundary Element Methods

  • Ferri M. H. AliabadiEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53605-6_18-1



Boundary element method (BEM) is a computational technique for the approximate solution of the problems in continuum mechanics. In BEM the governing differential equations are transformed into equivalent boundary integral equations with the aid of Gauss (divergence) theorem and fundamental solutions.

Fundamental solutions are special type of Green’s functions, which are solutions of the governing equations due to a point force acting in an infinite domain.


The attraction of the boundary element method (BEM) is generally attributed to the reduction in the dimensionality of the problem; for two-dimensional problems, only the line boundary of the domain needs to be discretized into elements (see Fig. 1), and for three-dimensional problems, only the surface of the problem needs to be discretized. In comparison to the finite element method (FEM) and other domain-type analysis techniques, a boundary analysis results in a...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Aliabadi MH (2002) The boundary element method, vol2: applications in solids and structures. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  2. Balaš J, Sládek J, Sládek V (2013) Stress analysis by boundary element methods. Elsevier, JerusalemCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedetti I, Aliabadi MH (2015) Multiscale modeling of polycrystalline materials: a boundary element approach to material degradation and fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 289:429–453MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benedetti I, Aliabadi MH, Davi G (2008) A fast 3D dual boundary element method based on hierarchical matrices. Int J Solids Struct 45(7–8):2355–2376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beskos DE (1991) Static and dynamic analysis of plate and shells. Spinger, Berlin, pp 93–140Google Scholar
  6. Bettie E (1872) Teroria dell elasticita. 11 Nuovo Ciemento 7–10Google Scholar
  7. Brebbia CA (1978) The boundary element method for engineers. Pentech Press, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  8. Cisilino AP, Aliabadi MH (1998) A three dimensional boundary element formulation for the elastoplastic analysis of cracked bodies. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42:237–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruse TA (1969) Numerical solutions in three-dimensional elastostatics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 5:1259–1274zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Dirgantara A, Aliabadi MH (1999) A new boundary element formulation for plate shear deformable shells analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45:1257–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dominguez J (1993) Boundary elements in dynamics. Computational Mechanics Publication, SouthamptonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Fedelinski P et al (1993) Boundary element formulations for the dynamic analysis of cracked structures engineering analysis with. Bound Elem 17(1):45–56MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kupradze VD (1965) Potential methods in the theory of elasricity. Isreal Prog Sci TransGoogle Scholar
  14. Lachat JC, Watson JO (1976) Effective numerical treatment of boundary integral equations: a formulation for three-dimensional elastostatics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 10:991–1005.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Man KW et al (1993) DPBEM frictional contact analysis: load incremental technique. Comput Struct 47(6):893–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mandelson A (1968) Plasticity: theory and applications. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Massonnet CE (1965) Numerical use of integral procedures, In Stress Analysis, Chapters 10, Wiley, London, 198–235Google Scholar
  18. Mi Y, Aliabadi MH (1992) Dual boundary element method for three dimensional fracture mechanics analysis. Eng Anal Bound Elem 10:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Perez-Gavilan JJ, Aliabadi MH (2001) A symmetric Galerkin BEM for multi-connected bodies: a new approach. Eng Anal Bound Elem 25:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Portela A, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1992) The dual boundary element method: effective implementation for crack problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 33(6):1269–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rigby R, Aliabadi MH (1995) Out-of-core solver for large, multi-zone boundary element matrices. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38(9):1507–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rodríguez-Tembleque R et al (2010) A boundary element formulation for wear modeling on 3D contact and rolling-contact problems. Int J Solids Struct 47(18–19):2600–2612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sfantos GK, Aliabadi MH (2007a) A boundary cohesive grain element formulation for modelling intergranular microfracture in polycrystalline brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69(8):1590–1626MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sfantos GK, Aliabadi MH (2007b) Multi-scale boundary element modelling of material degradation and fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(7):1310–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Somigliana C (1886) Sopra I’equilbrio di un corpo elastic isotropo. II Nuovo Cienmento 17–19Google Scholar
  26. Telles JCF (1983) The boundary element method applied to inelastic problems, Lecture note series. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vodicka R, Mantic V, París F (2007) Symmetric variational formulation of BIE for domain decomposition problems in elasticity-an SGBEM approach for nonconforming discretizations of curved interfaces. Comput Model Eng Sci 17(3):173MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AeronauticsImperial CollegeLondonUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • René de Borst
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Structural EngineeringUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK