Skip to main content

Modular Design

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering

Synonyms

Modularity

Definition

Modular design refers to designing products by organizing sub-assemblies and components as distinct building blocks (i.e., modules) that can be integrated through configuration to fulfill various customer and engineering requirements.

Theory and Application

Introduction

Modular design is basically to decompose complex systems into simple modules in order to more efficiently organize complex designs and processes. The concept was first introduced by (Starr 1965), in which the use of modular product in production was proposed as a new concept to develop variety. It makes possible to modify specific modules for a new requirement without influencing the main infrastructure, so that the complex problems can be decomposed into several small ones. Modular design concept has been employed in many fields of design and manufacturing.

The main advantages of modular design include design flexibility, augmentation, and cost reduction. Due to grouping the components to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander C (1964) Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DM (1997) Agile product development for mass customization: how to develop and deliver products for mass customization, niche markets, JIT, build-to-order, and flexible manufacturing. Irwin Professional, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Wang Y, Tseng MM (2009) Mass customization as a collaborative engineering effort. Int J Collab Eng 1(1/2):152–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier DA (1981) The measurement and operating benefits of component part commonality. Decis Sci 12(1):85–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1981.tb00063.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JR, Duffy MR, Irani R, Meunier K, Orelup M (1988) A proposed taxonomy of mechanical design problems. In: Tipnis VA, Patton EM et al (eds) Proceedings of ASME computers in engineering conference, v(2), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, San Francisco, 31 July – 4 Aug 1988, pp 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Erens F, Verhulst K (1997) Architectures for product families. Comput Ind Spec Issue Co-operation Manuf Syst 33(2/3):165–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Erixon G (1996) Design for modularity. In: Huang GQ (ed) Design for X – concurrent engineering imperatives. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 356–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Erixon G, von Yxkull A, Arnström A (1996) Modularity – the basis for product and factory reengineering. Ann CIRP 45(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlandsson A, Erixon G, Ostgren B (1992) Product modules – the link between QFD and DFA. In: 1992 International Forum on Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DFMA), Boothroyd Dewhurst, Newport/Wakefield, 15–16 June 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K, Ishii K (1997) Task structuring toward computational approaches to product variety design. In: Proceedings of DETC’97. 1997 ASME design engineering technical conferences, 14–17 Sept 1997, Sacramento. DETC97/DAC-3766. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architecture innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms, Admistrative science quarterly. Spec Issue Technol Organ Innov 35(1):9–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillström F (1994) Applying axiomatic design to interface analysis in modular product development. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division; Design Automation Committee (Publication) DE, vol 69-2, ASME, Proceedings of the 2th annual design automation conference, advances in design automation, Minneapolis, 11–14 Sept 1994, pp 363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka V, Eder WE (1988) Theory of technical systems: a total concept theory for engineering design. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii K, Eubanks CF, Di Marco P (1994) Design for product retirement and material life-cycle. Mater Des J 15(2):225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii K, Juengel C, Eubanks CF (1995) Design for product variety: key to product line structuring. In: Proceedings of the 1995 design engineering technical conferences: presented at the 1995 ASME design engineering technical conferences, 17–20 Sept 1995, Boston. ASME, Design Engineering Division, New York. ASME, DE-Vol 83-2, pp 499–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J, Tseng MM (2000) Fundamentals of product family architecture. Integr Manuf Syst 11(7):469–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060010349776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J, Simpson TW, Siddique Z (2007a) Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review. J Intell Manuf 18(1):5–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0003-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J, Gershenson JK, Michalek JJ (2007b) Managing modularity and commonality in product and process development. Concurr Eng Res Appl 15(2):81–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X07079308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmarkar U, Kubat P (1987) Modular product design and product support. Eur J Oper Res 29(1):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90195-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlhase N, Birkhofer H (1996) Development of modular structures: the prerequisite for successful modular products. J Eng Des 7(3):279–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544829608907941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause FL, Kimura F, Kjellberg T, Lu SC-Y et al (1993) Product modelling. Ann CIRP 42(2):695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62532-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak A, Huang C-C (1996) Development of modular products. IEEE Trans Components Packag Manuf Technol, Part A 19(4):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1109/95.554934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanner P, Malmqvist J (1996) An approach towards considering technical and economic aspects in product architecture design. In: Proceedings of the 2nd WDK-workshop on product structuring, TU Delft, The Netherlands, 3–4 June 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MH (1997) Revitalize your product lines through continuous platform renewal. Res Technol Manag 40(2):17–28

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MH, Lehnerd AP (1997) The power of product platforms: building value and cost leadership. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb PJ, Bras B, Rosen DW (1996) Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle. J Mech Des 120(3):483–490. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 2nd edn (trans: Wallace K). Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimmler TU, Eppinger SD (1994) Integration analysis of product decompositions. In: Proceedings of ASME design theory and methodology conference, Minneapolis, Sept 1994, DE-Vol 68, ASME, New York, pp 343–351. http://web.mit.edu/eppinger/www/pdf/Pimmler_DTM1994.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2016

  • Simon HA (1981) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TW (2004) Product platform design and customization: status and promise. AI EDAM 18(1):3–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060404040028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr MK (1965) Modular production-a new concept. Harv Bus Rev 43(6):131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward DV (1981) Systems analysis and management: structure, strategy and design. Petrocelli Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevenot HJ, Simpson TW (2006) Commonality indices for product family design: a detailed comparison. J Eng Design 17(2):99–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820500275693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT (1994) Fundaments of product modularity. In: Dasu S, Eastman C (eds) Management of design. Springer, New York, pp 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1390-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res Policy 24(3):419–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (1995) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2000) Product design and development, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell M Tseng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 CIRP

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Tseng, M.M., Wang, Y., Jiao, R.J. (2019). Modular Design. In: Chatti, S., Laperrière, L., Reinhart, G., Tolio, T. (eds) CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53120-4_6460

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics