Advertisement

Anästhesiologische Beurteilung des Patienten: Kardiovaskuläres System

  • Stephan Czerner
  • Bernhard Zwißler
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer Reference Medizin book series (SRM)

Zusammenfassung

Nach Angaben des statistischen Bundesamts sind die Häufigkeiten der Todesursachen in Deutschland seit Jahren stabil. Mit Abstand führen Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen die Sterbestatistik als Haupttodesursache an. Dies impliziert für den Anästhesisten die enorme Bedeutung um das Wissen der Grundlagen und Prinzipien des kardiovaskulären Systems. In diesem Kapitel werden die Anatomie und Physiologie des Herz-Kreislaufsystem dargestellt und die Pathophysiologie der häufigsten Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen aufgezeigt. Im Anschluss erfolgt eine kurze Übersicht über die speziellen Möglichkeiten der kardiovaskulären Diagnostik.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Zwissler B (1992) Monitoring der myokardialen Pumpfunktion – Methoden und ihr Stellenwert. In: Hobbhahn J, Conzen P, Peter K, Taeger K (Hrsg) Der kardiale Risikopatient in der operativen Medizin. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kovac JD, de Bono DP (1996) Cardiac catheter complications related to left main stem disease. Heart 76(1):76–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campeau L (1976) Letter: grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 54(3):522–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Libby P (1998) Artherosclerosis. In: Harrison TR (Hrsg) Principles of internal medicine, 14. Aufl. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Writing Group M et al (2016) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133(4):e38–e60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mangano DT (1990) Perioperative cardiac morbidity. Anesthesiology 72(1):153–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Members WG et al (2016) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133(4):e38–e60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Devereaux PJ et al (2005) Surveillance and prevention of major perioperative ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a review. CMAJ 173(7):779–788CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alpert JS et al (2000) Myocardial infarction redefined – a consensus document of the joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 36(3):959–969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keith J (1978) Heart disease in infancy and childhood. Macmillian, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Unger F (1998) Herzerkrankunen und Interventionsmöglichkeiten. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barrat-Boyes JKB (1993) Cardiac surgery, 2. Aufl. Churchill Livingstone, New York/Edingburgh/London/TokioGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ho KK et al (1993) Survival after the onset of congestive heart failure in Framingham Heart Study subjects. Circulation 88(1):107–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hunt SA, American College of Cardiology, and American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (2005) ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 46(6):e1–e82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fleisher LA et al (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing committee to revise the 2002 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery): developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 116(17):1971–1996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kristensen SD et al (2014) ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: the Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J 35(35):2383–2431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poldermans D et al (2010) Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery: the Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur J Anaesthesiol 27(2):92–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft fär Anasthesiologie und I et al (2010) Präoperative Evaluation erwachsener Patienten vor elektiven, nichtkardiochirurgischen Eingriffen. Gemeinsame Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin. Anaesthesist 59:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Anasthesiologie und I et al (2017) Preoperative evaluation of adult patients before elective, noncardiothoracic surgery : joint recommendation of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Society of Surgery, and the German Society of Internal Medicine. Anaesthesist 66(6):442–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bartels C et al (1997) Cardiac risk stratification for high-risk vascular surgery. Circulation 95(11):2473–2475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ashton CM et al (1993) The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 118(7):504–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dahn J, Buche I, Segiet W (2000) Koronare Herzerkrankung und Myokardinfarkt – Aktueller Stand des perioperativen Managements bei nichtkardiochirurgischen Operationen. Anästh Intensivmed 41:11Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eisenberg MJ et al (1992) Monitoring for myocardial ischemia during noncardiac surgery. A technology assessment of transesophageal echocardiography and 12-lead electrocardiography. The Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. JAMA 268(2):210–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Glance LG et al (2012) The Surgical Mortality Probability Model: derivation and validation of a simple risk prediction rule for noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg 255(4):696–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Corteville DC et al (2007) N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide as a diagnostic test for ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary disease: data from the heart and soul study. Arch Intern Med 167(5):483–489CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hunt SA et al (2005) ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 112(12):e154–e235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hamm CW, Braunwald E (2000) A classification of unstable angina revisited. Circulation 102(1):118–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weber M et al (2013) Incremental value of high-sensitive troponin T in addition to the revised cardiac index for peri-operative risk stratification in non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 34(11):853–862CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kannel WB, Abbott RD (1984) Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. An update on the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 311(18):1144–1147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Callaghan LC, Edwards ND, Reilly CS (1995) Utilisation of the pre-operative ECG. Anaesthesia 50(6):488–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moorman JR et al (1985) The yield of the routine admission electrocardiogram. A study in a general medical service. Ann Intern Med 103(4):590–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murdoch CJ et al (1999) The pre-operative ECG in day surgery: a habit? Anaesthesia 54(9):907–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jeger RV et al (2006) Long-term prognostic value of the preoperative 12-lead electrocardiogram before major noncardiac surgery in coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 151(2):508–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Archer C, Levy AR, McGregor M (1993) Value of routine preoperative chest x-rays: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 40(11):1022–1027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Joo HS et al (2005) The value of screening preoperative chest x-rays: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth 52(6):568–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bohm M (1997) Preoperative cardiac risk assessment and diagnosis. The view of the cardiologist. Anaesthesist 46(Suppl 2):S85–S95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Task Force M et al (2013) ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34(38):2949–3003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Braunwald ASE (1998) Ischemic heart disease. In: Harrison TR (Hrsg) Principles of internal medicine, 14. Aufl. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Barolsky SM et al (1979) Differences in electrocardiographic response to exercise of women and men: a non-Bayesian factor. Circulation 60(5):1021–1027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weiner DA et al (1979) Exercise stress testing. Correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary-artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). N Engl J Med 301(5):230–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mangano DT (1995) Preoperative assessment of the patient with cardiac disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 10(5):530–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mangano DT, Goldman L (1995) Preoperative assessment of patients with known or suspected coronary disease. N Engl J Med 333(26):1750–1756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Working Group on Stress T (1996) Cardiovascular stress testing: a description of the various types of stress tests and indications for their use. Mayo Clin Proc 71(1):43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baron JF et al (1994) Dipyridamole-thallium scintigraphy and gated radionuclide angiography to assess cardiac risk before abdominal aortic surgery. N Engl J Med 330(10):663–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Poldermans D et al (2000) Role of dobutamine stress echocardiography for preoperative cardiac risk assessment before major vascular surgery: a diagnostic tool comes of age. Echocardiography 17(1):79–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sicari R et al (2009) Stress Echocardiography Expert Consensus Statement – executive summary: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur Heart J 30(3):278–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zaret BL, Wackers FJ (1993) Nuclear cardiology (2). N Engl J Med 329(12):855–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mangano DT et al (1991) Dipyridamole thallium-201 scintigraphy as a preoperative screening test. A reexamination of its predictive potential. Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Circulation 84(2):493–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mangano DT (1999) Assessment of the patient with cardiac disease: an anesthesiologist’s paradigm. Anesthesiology 91(5):1521–1526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Erbel R (1996) The dawn of a new era – non-invasive coronary imaging. Herz 21(2):75–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cohen MC (1998) The role of the cardiology consultant: putting it all together. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 40(5):419–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinikum der LMU München, Klinik für AnaesthesiologieMünchenDeutschland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Christian Werner
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Klinik für AnästhesiologieMainzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations