Verarbeitung politischer Informationen

Kümpel, Anna Sophie; Unkel, Julian

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_35-1

Anna Sophie Kümpel⁵ &
Julian Unkel⁶

632 Accesses
5 Altmetric

Zusammenfassung

Das Kapitel gibt einen Überblick über Theorien und Modelle zur Verarbeitung politischer Informationen. Zunächst werden wesentliche Phasen der Informationsverarbeitung skizziert. Es folgt eine Diskussion von Zwei-Prozess-Modellen der Informationsverarbeitung anhand der beiden bedeutsamsten Ansätze, dem Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell und dem Heuristisch-Systematischen Modell. Abschließend wird auf mögliche Verzerrungen bei der Informationsverarbeitung durch Heuristiken und Motivated Reasoning eingegangen. Zu allen Ansätzen werden aktuelle Forschungsfragen mittels ausgewählter Studien illustriert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
Die Bezeichnung von Informationsverarbeitungsprozessen als ‚fehlerhaft‘ wurde häufig kritisiert, da sie a) die Existenz einer (normativ) richtigen Informationsverarbeitung impliziert und b) ausblendet, dass eine aus Sicht der Rezipient:innen verzerrte Informationsverarbeitung durchaus funktional (und somit praktisch richtig) sein kann (siehe z. B. Gigerenzer 1991; Gigerenzer und Gaissmaier 2011).

Literatur

Albarracín, Dolores. 2002. Cognition in persuasion: An analysis of information processing in response to persuasive communications. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Bd. 34, 61–130. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80004-1.
Arendt, Florian, Temple Northup, und Lindita Camaj. 2019. Selective exposure and news media brands: Implicit and explicit attitudes as predictors of news choice. Media Psychology 22(3): 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1338963.
Article Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer, und Kathleen D. Vohs. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5(4): 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323.
Article Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody C. 2007. Humor on the next frontier: Youth, online political humor, and the JibJab effect. Social Science Computer Review 25(3): 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439306295395.
Article Google Scholar
Beierlein, Constanze, und Axel Burger. 2020. Prozesse der Beschaffung und Verarbeitung politischer Informationen. In Politikwissenschaftliche Einstellungs- und Verhaltensforschung: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium, Hrsg. Thorsten Faas, Oscar W. Gabriel und Jürgen Maier, 93–120. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845264899.
Chapter Google Scholar
Beißert, Hanna, Meike Köhler, Marina Rempel, und Constanze Beierlein. 2014. Eine deutschsprachige Kurzskala zur Messung des Konstrukts Need for Cognition. Die Need for Cognition Kurzskala (NFC-K). GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. http://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/gesis_reihen/gesis_arbeitsberichte/WorkingPapers_2014-32.pdf. Zugegriffen am 29.01.2021.
Bode, Leticia, Emily K. Vraga, und Sonya Troller-Renfree. 2017. Skipping politics: Measuring avoidance of political content in social media. Research & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017702990.
Borah, Porismita, Kjerstin Thorson, und Hyunseo Hwang. 2015. Causes and consequences of selective exposure among political blog readers: The role of hostile media perception in motivated media use and expressive participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(2): 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1008608.
Article Google Scholar
Brosius, Hans-Bernd, und Norbert Mundorf. 1990. Eins und eins ist ungleich zwei: Differentielle Aufmerksamkeit, Lebhaftigkeit von Information und Medienwirkung. Publizistik 35(4): 398–407.
Google Scholar
Brosius, Hans-Bernd, und Julian Unkel. 2016. Processing the news: How people tame the information tide von Doris A. Graber (1984). In Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung, Hrsg. Matthias Potthoff, 219–230. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Chapter Google Scholar
Bucher, Hans-Jürgen, und Peter Schumacher. 2006. The relevance of attention for selecting news content. An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media. Communications 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.022.
Cacioppo, John T., und Richard E. Petty. 1982. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(1): 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116.
Article Google Scholar
Camaj, Lindita. 2019. From selective exposure to selective information processing: A motivated reasoning approach. Media and Communication 7(3): 8–11. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2289.
Article Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly. 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(5): 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752.
Article Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly. 1987. The heuristic model of persuasion. In Social influence: The Ontario symposium, Bd. 5, Hrsg. Mark P. Zanna, James M. Olson und C. Peter Herman, 3–39. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly, und Alison Ledgerwood. 2012. A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. In Handbook of theories of social psychology: Bd. 1, 246–266. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n13.
Chapter Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly, Akiva Liberman, und Alice H. Eagly. 1989. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Unintended Thought, Hrsg. James S. Uleman und John A. Bargh, 212–252. New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly, Roger Giner-Sorolla, und Serena Chen. 1996. „Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing“. In The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior, Hrsg. Peter M. Gollwitzer und John A. Bargh, 553–578. New York: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Chen, Serena, Kimberly Duckworth, und Shelly Chaiken. 1999. Motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Psychological Inquiry 10(1): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1001_6.
Article Google Scholar
Claypool, Heather M., Jamie O’Mally, und Jamie DeCoster. 2012. Dual-process models of information processing. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, Hrsg. Norbert M. Seel, 1046–1048. Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_676.
Chapter Google Scholar
Colombo, Celine, Marco R. Steenbergen, Celine Colombo, und Marco R. Steenbergen. 2020. Heuristics and biases in political decision making. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.974.
Dancey, Logan, und Geoffrey Sheagley. 2013. Heuristics behaving badly: Party cues and voter knowledge. American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00621.x.
Article Google Scholar
Dember, William N. 1974. Motivation and the cognitive revolution. American Psychologist 29(3): 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035907.
Article Google Scholar
Dvir-Gvirsman, Shira. 2019. I like what I see: Studying the influence of popularity cues on attention allocation and news selection. Information, Communication & Society 22(2): 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1379550.
Engelmann, Ines, Andrea Kloss, Christoph Neuberger, und Tobias Brockmann. 2019. Visibility through information sharing: The role of tweet authors and communication styles in retweeting political information on Twitter. International Journal of Communication 13(2019): 3569–3588.
Google Scholar
Fawzi, Nayla. 2020. Objektive Informationsquelle, Watchdog und Sprachrohr der Bürger? Die Bewertung der gesellschaftlichen Leistungen von Medien durch die Bevölkerung. Publizistik 65(2): 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-020-00572-w.
Article Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., und Shelley E. Taylor. 2017. Social cognition: From brains to culture, 3. Aufl. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Forehand, Mark, John Gastil, und Mark A. Smith. 2004. Endorsements as voting cues: Heuristic and systematic processing in initiative elections. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34(11): 2215–2233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01974.x.
Article Google Scholar
Fortunato, David, und Randolph T. Stevenson. 2019. Heuristics in context. Political Science Research and Methods 7(2): 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.37.
Article Google Scholar
Friedrich, Katja, und Cordula Nitsch. 2019. Celebrity political endorsement and young voters in Europe: A five-country comparison on celebrity support effectiveness in the European Elections. International Journal of Communication 13(2019): 4874–4894.
Google Scholar
Früh, Hannah. 2013. Grundlagen: Informationsverarbeitung. In Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung, Hrsg. Wolfgang Schweiger und Andreas Fahr, 133–151. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18967-3_6.
Chapter Google Scholar
Garrett, R. Kelly. 2009a. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(2): 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x.
Article Google Scholar
Garrett, R. Kelly. 2009b. „Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate“. Journal of Communication 59(4): 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x.
Article Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 1991. How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond „heuristics and biases“. European Review of Social Psychology 2(1): 83–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779143000033.
Article Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, und Wolfgang Gaissmaier. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62(1): 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.
Article Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1984. Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. New York: Longman.
Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 2001. Processing politics: Learning from television in the internet age, Studies in communication, media, and public opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Haim, Mario, Anna Sophie Kümpel, und Hans-Bernd Brosius. 2018. Popularity cues in online media: A review of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and general effects. Studies in Communication and Media (SCM) 7(2): 186–207. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58.
Article Google Scholar
Heiss, Raffael, Johannes Knoll, und Jörg Matthes. 2019. Pathways to political (dis-)engagement: Motivations behind social media use and the role of incidental and intentional exposure modes in adolescents’ political engagement. Communications 45(1): 671–693. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-2054.
Iyengar, Shanto, und Kyu S. Hahn. 2009. Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication 59(1): 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x.
Article Google Scholar
Jäckle, Sebastian, und Thomas Metz. 2017. Beauty contest revisited: The effects of perceived attractiveness, competence, and likability on the electoral success of German MPs. Politics & Policy 45(4): 495–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12209.
Article Google Scholar
Jennings, Freddie J. 2019. An uninformed electorate: Identity-motivated elaboration, partisan cues, and learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research 47(5): 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1679385.
Article Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, und Amos Tversky. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Book Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. 2005. Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior 27(2): 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-1764-y.
Article Google Scholar
Kitchen, Philip J., Gayle Kerr, Don E. Schultz, Rod McColl, und Heather Pals. 2014. The elaboration likelihood model: Review, critique and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing 48(11/12): 2033–2050. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0776.
Article Google Scholar
Klimmt, Christoph, und Magdalena Rosset. 2020. Das Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell. 2. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia, Axel Westerwick, und Benjamin K. Johnson. 2015. Selective exposure in the communication technology context. In The handbook of the psychology of communication technology, Hrsg. S. Shyam Sundar, 407–424. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Knoll, Johannes, und Jörg Matthes. 2017. The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45(1): 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0503-8.
Article Google Scholar
Kraus, Sidney, und Richard M. Perloff, Hrsg. 1985. Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Google Scholar
Kümpel, Anna Sophie, und Diana Rieger. 2020. Kann Instagram auch Politik? Beeinflussung der Informationsnutzung und Effekte für die Meinungsbildung durch politische Inhalte. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. https://www.kas.de/de/einzeltitel/-/content/kann-instagram-auch-politik.
Kunda, Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
Article Google Scholar
Lang, Annie. 2000. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication 50(1): 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x.
Article Google Scholar
Lang, Annie. 2017. Limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing (LC4MP). In The international encyclopedia of media effects, Hrsg. Patrick Rössler, Cynthia A. Hoffner und Liesbet Zoonen, 1. Aufl. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0077.
Lau, Richard R., und David P. Redlawsk. 2001. Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951–971. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669334.
Article Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., und David O. Sears, Hrsg. 1986. Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Liu, Zhiming, Lu Liu, und Hong Li. 2012. Determinants of information retweeting in microblogging. Internet Research 22(4): 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211250980.
Article Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, und Charles S. Taber. 2013. The rationalizing voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139032490.
Book Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, und Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Marquart, Franziska, und Brigitte Naderer. 2016. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change von Richard E. Petty & John T. Cacioppo (1986). In Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung, Hrsg. Matthias Potthoff, 231–242. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_20.
Chapter Google Scholar
Massaro, Dominic W., und Nelson Cowan. 1993. Information processing models: Microscopes of the mind. Annual Review of Psychology 44:383–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.002123.
Article Google Scholar
Matthes, Jörg. 2004. Die Schema-Theorie in der Medienwirkungsforschung: Ein unscharfer Blick in die ‚Black Box‘? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 52(4): 545–568. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2004-4-545.
Article Google Scholar
Matthes, Jörg, Andreas Nanz, Marlis Stubenvoll, und Raffael Heiss. 2020. Processing news on social media. The political incidental news exposure model (PINE). Journalism 21(8): 1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915371.
Article Google Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., und Milton Lodge. 1996. Political information processing: A review essay. Political Communication 13(1): 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963099.
Article Google Scholar
Medders, Ryan B., und Miriam J. Metzger. 2018. The role of news brands and leads in exposure to political information on the Internet. Digital Journalism 6(5): 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1320770.
Article Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., Laura B. Stephenson, und Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. 2016. Deciding correctly: Variance in the effective use of party cues. In Voting experiments, Hrsg. André Blais, Jean-François Laslier und Karine Van der Straeten, 19–42. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5_2.
Chapter Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1993. Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues. Political Behavior 15(2): 167–192.
Article Google Scholar
Moy, Patricia, und Eike Mark Rinke. 2012. Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of published opinion polls. In Opinion polls and the media: Reflecting and shaping public opinion, Hrsg. Christina Holtz-Bacha und Jesper Strömbäck, 225–245. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374959_11.
Chapter Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2007. Political psychology and choice. In The Oxford handbook of political behavior, Hrsg. Russell J. Dalton und Hans-Dieter Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0005.
Chapter Google Scholar
Nai, Alessandro. 2019. Voter information processing and political decision making. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.912.
Nanz, Andreas, und Jorg Matthes. 2020. Learning from incidental exposure to political information in online environments. Journal of Communication 70(6): 769–793. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa031.
Article Google Scholar
Neisser, Ulric. 1967. Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Neuman, W. Russell, George E. Marcus, und Michael B. MacKuen. 2018. Hardwired for news: Affective intelligence and political attention. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 62(4): 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2018.1523169.
Article Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., und Lee Ross. 1980. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Oeldorf-Hirsch, Anne, und Christina L. DeVoss. 2020. Who posted that story? Processing layered sources in Facebook news posts. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 97(1): 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019857673.
Article Google Scholar
Perloff, Richard M. 2015. A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect. Mass Communication and Society 18(6): 701–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1051234.
Article Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., und Pablo Briñol. 2012. The elaboration likelihood model. In Handbook of theories of social psychology: Bd. 1, Hrsg. Paul Van Lange, Arie Kruglanski und E. Higgins, 224–245. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n12.
Chapter Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., und John T. Cacioppo. 1986. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
Book Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., und Luke Hinsenkamp. 2017. Routes to persuasion, central and peripheral. In The SAGE encyclopedia of political behavior, Hrsg. Fathali M. Moghaddam, 718–720. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483391144.n330.
Chapter Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., Pablo Briñol, und Joseph R. Priester. 2009. Mass media attitude change: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, Hrsg. Jennings Bryant und Mary Beth Oliver, 3. Aufl., 125–164. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Polk, Jeremy, Dannagal G. Young, und R. Lance Holbert. 2009. Humor complexity and political influence: An elaboration likelihood approach to the effects of humor type in the Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Atlantic Journal of Communication 17(4): 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870903210055.
Article Google Scholar
Rozin, Paul, und Edward B. Royzman. 2001. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5(4): 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2.
Article Google Scholar
Sanders, A. F. 1990. Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica 74(2–3): 123–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90004-Y.
Article Google Scholar
Schieb, Carla, und Mike Preuss. 2018. Considering the Elaboration Likelihood Model for simulating hate and counter speech on Facebook. Studies in Communication and Media (SCM) 7(4): 580–606. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-4-580.
Article Google Scholar
Schill, Dan. 2012. The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication 12(2): 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2011.653504.
Article Google Scholar
Schweiger, Wolfgang. 2007. Theorien der Mediennutzung. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS.
Google Scholar
Shahin, Saif, Magdalena Saldaña, und Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2020. Peripheral elaboration model: The impact of incidental news exposure on political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1832012.
Sikorski, Christian von, und Cornelia Brantner. 2018. Das Bild in der politischen Kommunikation. Grundlegende Erkenntnisse aufgezeigt an einer vertiefenden Betrachtung der visuellen Skandalberichterstattung. In Handbuch Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung, Hrsg. Katharina Lobinger, 1–24. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06738-0_8-1.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, und Phillip E. Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology, Cambridge studies in public opinion and political psychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720468.
Strickland, April A., Charles S. Taber, und Milton Lodge. 2011. Motivated reasoning and public opinion. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 36(6): 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-1460524.
Article Google Scholar
Sundar, S. Shyam. 2008. The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In Digital media, youth and credibility, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on digital media and learning, Hrsg. Miriam J. Metzger und Andrew J. Flanagin, 73–100. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., und Milton Lodge. 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–769.
Article Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., und Milton Lodge. 2016. The illusion of choice in democratic politics: The unconscious impact of motivated political reasoning. Political Psychology 37(S1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12321.
Article Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., und Everett Young. 2013. Political information processing. In The Oxford handbook of political psychology, Hrsg. Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears und Jack S. Levy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0017.
Tversky, Amos, und Daniel Kahneman. 1973. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5(2): 207–232.
Article Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, und Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Article Google Scholar
Unkel, Julian. 2019. Informationsselektion mit Suchmaschinen. Wahrnehmung und Auswahl von Suchresultaten. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Book Google Scholar
Wieland, Mareike, und Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw. 2020. Conceptualizing different forms of news processing following incidental news contact: A triple-path model. Journalism 21(8): 1049–1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915353.
Article Google Scholar
Winter, Stephan. 2020. Heuristic-systematic model. In The international encyclopedia of media psychology, 1–6. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0202.
Xu, Qian. 2017. Dual process models of persuasion. In The international encyclopedia of media effects, Hrsg. Patrick Rössler, Cynthia A. Hoffner und Liesbet van Zoonen, 1–13. London: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0074.
Chapter Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
Anna Sophie Kümpel
LMU München, München, Deutschland
Julian Unkel

Authors

Anna Sophie Kümpel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Julian Unkel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Sophie Kümpel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
Isabelle Borucki
Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Stefan Marschall
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
Thomas Zerback

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kümpel, A.S., Unkel, J. (2021). Verarbeitung politischer Informationen. In: Borucki, I., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., Marschall, S., Zerback, T. (eds) Handbuch Politische Kommunikation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_35-1

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_35-1
Received: 09 February 2021
Accepted: 15 February 2021
Published: 02 April 2021
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26242-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26242-6
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

Latest
Verarbeitung politischer Informationen

Published:

30 December 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_35-2
Original
Verarbeitung politischer Informationen

Published:

02 April 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_35-1