Advertisement

Innovationen in Politik und Governance

Living reference work entry
  • 382 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel widmet sich der Forschung zu Innovationen in Politik und Governance, verstanden als die aktive Herstellung und Verbreitung von Neuerungen in der Gestaltung kollektiver Ordnungen. Davon ausgehend zeigen wir zunächst, dass sich in der historischen Rückschau zwei parallele Innovationsdiskurse, einer praxisbezogen und einer analytisch, unterscheiden lassen. Wir stellen dann drei aktuelle Forschungsstränge zu Neuerungsprozessen in Politik und Governance vor. Im Schlussteil identifizieren wir übergreifende Trends in der rezipierten Literatur und Desiderata für zukünftige Forschung.

Schlüsselwörter

Politikwandel Politikprozess Politiktransfer Policy mobilities Politikinstrumente 

Literatur

  1. Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter, und Duncan Snidal. 2000. The concept of legalization. International Organization 54(3): 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, Christopher K., und Martin Bartenberger. 2016. Varieties of experimentalism. Ecological Economics 130:64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, Tom, und Cristina Temenos. 2015. Urban policy mobilities research: Introduction to a debate. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39(4): 824–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, Frank R., und Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, Colin J., und Michael Howlett. 1992. The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences 25(3): 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borins, Sandford, Hrsg. 2009. Innovations in government. Research, recognition, and replication. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  7. Braithwaite, John, und Peter Drahos. 2000. Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruno, Isabelle. 2009. The „indefinite discipline“ of competitiveness benchmarking as a neoliberal technology of government. Minerva 47(3): 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callon, Michel. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? Hrsg. John Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Callon, Michel. 2007. What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics, Hrsg. Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa und Lucia Siu, 311–357. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, und Yannick Barthe. 2009. Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Capano, Giliberto, und Michael Howlett. 2009. Introduction: The determinants of policy change: Advancing the debate. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11(1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chubb, John E. 1983. Interest groups and the bureaucracy: The politics of energy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Colebatch, Hal K., Hrsg. 2006. The work of policy: An international survey. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. Collier, David, und Richard E. Messick. 1975. Prerequisites versus diffusion: Testing alternative explanations of social security adoption. American Political Science Review 69(4): 1299–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collier, Stephen J., und Aihwa Ong, Hrsg. 2005. Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems, 3–21. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Crivello, Silvia. 2015. Urban policy mobilities: The case of Turin as a smart city. European Planning Studies 23(5): 909–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dewey, John. 2012 [1927]. The public and its problems: An essay in political inquiry. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dezelay, Yves, und Bryant G. Garth, Hrsg. 2002. Global prescriptions. The production, exportation, and importation of a new legal orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Djelic, Marie-Laure. 1998. Exporting the American model. The postwar transformation of European business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Djelic, Marie-Laure, und Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, Hrsg. 2006. Introduction: A world of governance: The rise of transnational regulation. In Transnational governance. Institutional dynamics of regulation, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dolowitz, David, und David Marsh. 1996. Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political studies 44(2): 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dolowitz, David, und David Marsh. 2000. Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance 13(1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Easton, David. 1957. An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics 9(3): 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Edgerton, David. 2006. The Shock of the old. Technology and global history since 1900. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  26. Elkins, Zachary, und Beth Simmons. 2005. On waves, clusters, and diffusion: A conceptual framework. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598(1): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman, Richard. 2012. Reverb: Policy making in wave form. Environment and Planning-Part A 44(1): 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haas, Peter M. 1989. Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and mediterranean pollution control. International Organization 43(3): 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hajer, Marteen. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, Peter A. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall, Rodney Bruce, und Thomas J. Biersteker. 2002. The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hood, Christopher C. 1983. The tools of government. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howlett, Michael, Allan McConnell, und Anthony Perl. 2017. Moving policy theory forward: Connecting multiple stream and advocacy coalition frameworks to policy cycle models of analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration 76(1): 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. IUCN. 1974. Implications for the public administration of the United Nations conference on the Human Environment. In Organization and administration of environmental programmes, Hrsg. United Nations. Geneva: UN DESA.Google Scholar
  35. Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., und Paul A. Sabatier, Hrsg. 1993. The dynamics of policy-oriented learning. In Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach, 41–56. Boulder/San Francisco/Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kemp, René, Johan Schot, und Remco Hoogma. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10(2): 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kern, Florian, und Michael Howlett. 2009. Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences 42(4): 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kingdon, John W. 2003 [1984]. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2., überarb. Aufl. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2008. Theoretischer Konstruktivismus. Über die Einnistung von Wissensstrukturen in soziale Strukturen. In Theoretische Empirie: Zur Relevanz Qualitativer Forschung, Hrsg. Herbert Kalthoff, Stefan Hirschauer und Gesa Lindemann, 35–78. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  40. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lascoumes, Pierre, und Patrick Le Galès. 2007. From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance 20(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lasswell, Harold D. 1951. The policy orientation. In The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method, Hrsg. Daniel Lerner und Harold D. Lasswell, 3–15. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Legg, Stephen. 2011. Assemblage/apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault. Area 43(2): 128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lendvai, Noémi, und Paul Stubbs. 2009. Assemblages, translation, and intermediaries in South East Europe: Rethinking transnationalism and social policy. European Societies 11(5): 673–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lezaun, Javier, und Linda Soneryd. 2007. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 16(3): 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 1: 13–31.Google Scholar
  47. Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and markets. The world’s political-economic systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Lindblom, Charles E. 1979. Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review 1: 13–31.Google Scholar
  49. Lindblom, Charles E. 1980. The policy-making process. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lowi, Theodore. 1963. Toward functionalism in political science: The case of innovation in party systems. American Political Science Review 57(3): 570–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mackenzie, Donald. 2006. An angine, not a camera. How financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. MacLeod, Gordon, Martin Jones, Ian R. Cook, und Kevin Ward. 2011. Trans-urban networks of learning, mega events and policy tourism: The case of Manchester’s Commonwealth and Olympic Games projects. Urban Studies 48(12): 2519–2535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maier, Matthias Leonhard, Achim Hurrelmann, Frank Nullmeier, Tanja Pritzlaff, und Achim Wiesner. 2003. Politik als Lernprozeß. Wissenszentrierte Ansätze der Politikanalyse. München: Springer Fachmedien.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mannheim, Karl. 1995 [1929]. Ideologie und Utopie. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  55. McCann, Eugene. 2011. Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(1): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McCann, Eugene. 2013. Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography 34(1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McFarlane, Colin. 2011. The city as assemblage: Dwelling and urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29(4): 649–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, und Francisco O. Ramirez. 1997. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology 103:144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mukherjee, Ishani, und Michael Howlett. 2015. Who is a stream? Epistemic communities, instrument constituencies and advocacy coalitions in public policy-making. Politics and Governance 3(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Padgett, Stephen. 2003. Between synthesis and emulation: EU policy transfer in the power sector. Journal of European Public Policy 10(2): 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peck, Jamie, und Nik Theodore. 2010. Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum 41(2): 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peck, Jamie, und Nik Theodore. 2012. Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A 44(1): 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pierson, Paul. 1993. When effect becomes cause. Policy feedback and political change. World Politics: 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review: 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in time. History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pollitt, Christopher. 2007. Convergence or divergence: What has been happening in Europe? In New public management in Europe, Hrsg. Christopher Pollitt, Sandra Van Thiel und Vincent Homburg, 10–25. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Polsby, Nelson W. 1984. Political innovation in America. The politics of policy initiation. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prittwitz, Volker von. 1990. Das Katastrophenparadox. Elemente einer Theorie der Umweltpolitik. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.Google Scholar
  69. Radaelli, Claudio M. 2000. Policy transfer in the European Union: Institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance 13(1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2008. Praktiken und Diskurse: Eine sozialtheoretische und methodologische Relation. In Theoretische Empirie. Zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung, Hrsg. Herbert Kalthoff, Stefan Hirschauer und Gesa Lindemann, 188–209. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  71. Rogers, Everett M. 1995. The diffusion of innovations, 4. Aufl. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  72. Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2001. Le sacre du citoyen. Histoire du suffrage universel en France. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  73. Rose, Richard. 1991. What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy 11(01): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rose, Richard. 1993. Lesson-drawing in public policy: A guide to learning across time and space. Chatam: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21(2): 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sabel, Charles F., und Jonathan Zeitlin, Hrsg. 2010. Experimentalist governance in the European Union. Towards a new architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin, und Linda Wedlin. 2008. Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, Hrsg. Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby und Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, 218–242. New York: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Senghaas, Dieter. 1965. Politische Innovation. Versuch über den Panafrikanismus. Zeitschrift für Politikberatung 12:333–355.Google Scholar
  79. Shore, Cris, Susan Wright, und Davide Però, Hrsg. 2011. Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  80. Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, und Matt Watson. 2012. Dynamics of social practice. Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Simmons, Beth A., und Zachary Elkins. 2004. The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review 98(1): 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Simons, Arno, und Jan-Peter Voß. 2018. The concept of instrument constituencies: Accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance. Policy and Society 37(1): 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A new world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Stone, Diane. 2000. Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutes. Governance 13(1): 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stone, Diane. 2010. Private philanthropy or policy transfer? The transnational norms of the Open Society Institute. Policy & Politics 38(2): 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sutter, Barbara. 2005. Von Laien und guten Bürgern Partizipation als politische Technologie. In Wozu Experten? Ambivalenzen der Beziehung von Wissenschaft und Politik, Hrsg. Alexander Bogner und Helge Torgensen, 220–240. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  87. Swyngedouw, Erik. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies 42(11): 1991–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Temenos, Cristina, und Eugene McCann. 2013. Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass 7(5): 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2(1): 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thompson, Victor A. 1965. Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 5(6): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. UN DESA, Hrsg. 2006. Innovations in governance and public administration: Replicating what works. New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  92. Urry, John. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  93. Voß, Jan-Peter. 2007. Innovation processes in governance: The development of „emissions trading“ as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy 34(5): 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Voß, Jan-Peter. 2014. Performative policy studies: Realizing „transition management“. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 27(4): 317–343.Google Scholar
  95. Voß, Jan-Peter, und Nina Amelung. 2016. Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Social Studies of Science 26(5): 749–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Voß, Jan-Peter, und Richard Freeman, Hrsg. 2016. Knowing governance. The epistemic construction of political order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  97. Voß, Jan-Peter, und F. Schroth (2018). Experimentation: The politics of innovation and learning in polycentric governance. In Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action, Hrsg. A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. Van Asselt und J. Forster, 99–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Voß, Jan-Peter, und Arno Simons. 2014. Instrument constituencies and the supply-side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics 23(5): 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Voß, Jan-Peter, Adrian Smith, und John Grin. 2009. Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences 42(4): 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Walker, Jack. 1969. The diffusion of innovation among the American states. American Political Science Review 36(3): 880–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Westney, Eleanor. 1987. Imitation and innovation. The transfer of Western organizational patterns to Meiji Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultät WISO, Fachbereich SozialökonomieUniversität HamburgHamburgDeutschland
  2. 2.Institut für SoziologieTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations