Advertisement

Verteilte Innovationsprozesse

Collective Invention – User Innovation – Open Innovation
  • Jan-Felix Schrape
Living reference work entry

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die Konzepte der Collective Invention, User Innovation und Open Innovation, die jeweils unterschiedliche Ausprägungen verteilter Innovationsprozesse beschreiben. Nach einer Aufarbeitung ihrer Entwicklungs- und Anwendungsgeschichte wird ihr praktisches Zusammenspiel entlang von exemplarischen Fallstudien illustriert. Abschließend erfolgt die Diskussion neuerer Entwicklungen im Bereich der Informationstechnologien sowie eine kritische Würdigung.

Schlüsselwörter

Collective Invention User Innovation Open Innovation Forschung und Entwicklung Kooperation 

Literatur

  1. Allen, Robert C. 1983. Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity. Economic and social factors, Hrsg. Richard Nelson, 609–626. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bergquist, Magnus, Björn Remneland-Wikhamn, Jan Ljungberg, und Jonas Kuschel. 2011. Open innovation, generativity and the supplier as peer. The case of iPhone and Android. International Journal of Innovation Management 15(1): 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blättel-Mink, Birgit, und Raphael Menez. 2015. Open Innovation und User Innovation. In Kompendium der Innovationsforschung, Hrsg. Dies, 183–198. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  5. Bogers, Marcel, und Joel West. 2012. Managing distributed innovation: Strategic utilization of open and user innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management 21(1): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogers, Marcel, Allan Afuah, und Bettina Bastian. 2010. Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management 36(4): 857–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Capek, Peter G., Steven P. Frank, Steve Gerdt, und David Shields. 2005. A history of IBM’s open-Source involvement and strategy. IBM Systems Journal 44(2): 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, Henry W. 2003a. The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review 45(3): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chesbrough, Henry W. 2003b. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. New York: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chesbrough, Henry W. 2006a. Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, Hrsg. Henry W. Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke und Joel West, 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chesbrough, Henry W. 2006b. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. New York: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chesbrough, Henry W. 2017. The future of open innovation. Research-Technology Management 60(1): 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chesbrough, Henry W., und Melissa M. Appleyard. 2007. Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review 50(1): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chesbrough, Henry W., und Marcel Bogers. 2014. Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In New frontiers in open innovation, Hrsg. Henry W. Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke und Joel West, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahlander, Linus, und David M. Gann. 2010. How open is innovation? Research Policy 39(6): 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dickel, Sascha, und Jan-Felix Schrape. 2017. The logic of digital utopianism. NanoEthics 11(1): 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dolata, Ulrich. 2015. Volatile Monopole. Konzentration, Konkurrenz und Innovationsstrategien der Internetkonzerne. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 24(4): 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dolata, Ulrich, und Jan-Felix Schrape. 2014. App Economy: Demokratisierung des Softwaremarktes? Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 23(2): 76–80.Google Scholar
  20. Ebner, Winfried, Jan Marco Leimeister, und Helmut Krcmar. 2009. Community engineering for innovations. R&D Management 39(4): 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Enkel, Ellen, Oliver Gassmann, und Henry Chesbrough. 2009. Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 39(4): 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Felin, Teppo, und Todd R. Zenger. 2014. Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy 43(5): 914–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleck, James. 1988. Innofusion or diffusation? The nature of technological development in robotics, PICT Working paper 88/7. Edinburgh: Research Centre for Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  24. Flowers, Stephen. 2008. Harnessing the hackers. The emergence and exploitation of outlaw innovation. Research Policy 37(2): 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franke, Nikolaus, und Sonali Shah. 2003. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy 32(1): 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franz, Kathleen. 2001. Tinkering: Consumers reinvent the early automobile. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  27. Freedman, Des. 2012. Web 2.0 and the death of the blockbuster economy. In Misunderstanding the internet, Hrsg. James Curran, Natalie Fenton und Des Freedman, 69–94. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Freeman, Chris, et al. 1968. Chemical process plant: Innovation and the world market. National Institute Economic Review 45:29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garud, Raghu, und Joel Gehman. 2012. Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys. Evolutionary, relational and durational. Research Policy 41(6): 980–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geels, Frank W., und Johan Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36(3): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geels, Frank W., et al. 2016. The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy 45(4): 896–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ghazawneh, Ahmad, und Ola Henfridsson. 2015. A paradigmatic analysis of digital application marketplaces. Journal of Information Technology 30(3): 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goduscheit, René Chester, und Jacob Høj Jørgensen. 2013. User toolkits for innovation. A literature review. International Journal of Technology Management 61(3/4): 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haefliger, Stefan, Peter Jäger, und Georg Von Krogh. 2010. Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. Research Policy 39(9): 1198–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harhoff, Dietmar, und Karim R. Lakhani. 2016. Revolutionizing innovation: Users, communities, and open innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Herstatt, Cornelius, und Verena Nedon. 2014. Open Innovation. Eine Bestandsaufnahme aus Sicht der Forschung und Entwicklung. In Motoren der Innovation, Hrsg. Carsten Schultz und Katharina Hölzle, 247–266. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Herstatt, Cornelius, und Eric von Hippel. 1992. Developing new product concepts via the lead user method. A case study in a low tech field. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9(3): 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hienerth, Christoph, Christopher Lettl, und Peter Keinz. 2014. Synergies among producer firms, lead users, and user communities. The case of the Lego producer-user ecosystem. Journal of Product Innovation Management 31(4): 848–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hippel, Eric von. 1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy 5(3): 212–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hippel, Eric von. 1977. Transferring process equipment innovations from user-innovators to equipment manufacturing firms. R&D Management 8(1): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hippel, Eric von. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32(7): 791–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hippel, Eric von. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hippel, Eric von. 1994. „Sticky information“ and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40(4): 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hippel, Eric von. 2005. Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user ínnovation. Management review quarterly 55(1): 63–78.Google Scholar
  45. Hippel, Eric von, und Georg Von Krogh. 2006. Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives. R&D Management 36(3): 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hollander, Samuel. 1965. The sources of increased efficiency. A study of DuPont rayon plants. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Holmström, Bengt. 1999. Managerial incentive problems. A dynamic perspective. Review of Economic Studies 66(1): 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holtgrewe, Ursula, und Raymund Werle. 2001. De-commodifying software? Open source software between business strategy and social movement. Science Studies 14(2): 43–65.Google Scholar
  49. Hoppe, Heidrun C. 2000. Second-mover advantages in the strategic adoption of new technology under uncertainty. International Journal of Industrial Organization 18(2): 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hossain, Mokter, und Muhammad Anees-ur-Rehman. 2016. Open innovation. An analysis of twelve years of research. Strategic outsourcing: An international journal 9(1): 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. IFI Claims Patent Services. 2017. 2016 Top 50 US patent assignees. http://www.ificlaims.com/index.php?page=misc_top_50_2016. Zugegriffen am 10.03.2018.
  52. Lakhani, Karim, Lars Jeppesen, Peter Lohse, und Jill A. Panetta. 2008. The value of openness in scientific problem solving, Working paper no. 07/050. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  53. Lakhani, Karim, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, und Michael L. Tushman. 2013. Open innovation and organizational boundaries: Task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. In Handbook of economic organization. Integrating economic and organizational theory, Hrsg. Robert Gibbons und John Roberts, 355–382. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lamoreaux, Naomi R., und Kenneth L. Sokoloff. 2000. The geography of invention in the American glass industry 1870–1925. Journal of Economic History 60(3): 700–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Langlois, Richard N., und Paul L. Robertson. 1992. Networks and innovation in a modular system. Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy 21(4): 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Larsson, Rikard, Lars Bengtsson, Kristina Henriksson, und Judith Sparks. 1998. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science 9(3): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lerner, Joshua. 2012. The architecture of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lüthje, Christian. 2003. Customers as co-inventors: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of customer-driven innovations in the field of medical equipment. In Proceedings from the 32nd EMAC conference, 13–32.Google Scholar
  59. Lüthje, Christian. 2004. Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation 24(9): 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lüthje, Christian, Cornelius Herstatt, und Eric Von Hippel. 2005. User-innovators and „local“ information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy 34(6): 951–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Magnusson, Peter R., Jonas Matthing, und Per Kristensson. 2003. Managing user involvement in service innovation: Experiments with innovating end users. Journal of Service Research 6(2): 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McGaw, Judith A. 1987. Most wonderful machine. Mechanization and social change in Berkshire paper making 1801–1885. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Meyer, Peter B. 2003. Episodes of collective invention, BLS working paper 368. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morrison, Pamela D., John H. Roberts, und Eric von Hippel. 2000. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science 46(12): 1513–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Munir, Hussan, Krzysztof Wnuk, und Per Runeson. 2016. Open innovation in software engineering: A systematic mapping study. Empirical Software Engineering 21(2): 684–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nambisan, Satish, Ritu Agarwal, und Mohan Tanniru. 1999. Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quarterly 23(3): 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nelson, Richard R. 1982. The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 97(3): 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nuvolari, Alessandro. 2004. Collective invention during the British industrial revolution: The case of the Cornish pumping engine. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28(3): 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Osterloh, Margit, und Sandra Rota. 2007. Open source software development: Just another case of collective invention? Research Policy 36(2): 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Osterloh, Margit, Sandra Rota, und Roger Lüthi. 2006. ‚Collective Invention‘ als neues Innovationsmodell? In Die Wunderbare Welt der Wissensvermehrung, Hrsg. Olga Drossou, Stefan Krempl und Andreas Poltermann, 65–76. Heidelberg: Heise.Google Scholar
  71. Piller, Frank, und Christoph Ihl. 2013. Co-creation with customers. In Leading open innovation, Hrsg. Anne Sigismund Huff, Kathrin M. Möslein und Ralf Reichwald, 139–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Piller, Frank, und Joel West. 2014. Firms, users, and Innovation. An interactive model of coupled open innovation. In New frontiers in open innovation, Hrsg. Henry W. Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke und Joel West, 29–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Powell, Walter W., und Eric Giannella. 2010. Collective invention and inventor networks. In Handbook of the economics of innovation 1, Hrsg. Bronwyn H. Hall und Nathan Rosenberg, 575–605. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Raasch, Christina, Cornelius Herstatt, und Philip Lock. 2008. The dynamics of user innovation. Drivers and impediments of innovation activities. International Journal of Innovation Management 12(3): 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Reichwald, Ralf, und Frank Piller. 2009. Interaktive Wertschöpfung. Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  76. Rifkin, Jeremy. 2014. The zero marginal cost society. The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  77. Ritzer, George, und Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. Production, consumption, prosumption. The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‚prosumer‘. Journal of Consumer Culture 10(1): 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rogers, Everett M. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rosenberg, Nathan. 1976. Perspectives on technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sawhney, Mohanbir, und Emanuela Prandelli. 2000. Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review 42(4): 24–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schenk, Eric, und Claude Guittard. 2011. Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices. Journal of innovation economics & management 7(1): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schrape, Jan-Felix. 2016. Open-Source-Projekte als Utopie, Methode und Innovationsstrategie. Glückstadt: Hülsbusch.Google Scholar
  83. Schrape, Jan-Felix. 2017. Open-source projects as incubators of innovation: From niche phenomenon to integral part of the industry. Convergence. Online first.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517735795.
  84. Schulz, Celine, und Stefan Wagner. 2010. Outlaw community innovations. In Perspectives on user innovation, Hrsg. Stephen Flowers und Flis Henwood, 191–210. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  86. Scranton, Philip. 1997. Endless novelty: Specialty production and American industrialization 1865–1925. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Shah, Sonali. 2000. Sources and patterns of innovation in a consumer products field. Innovations in sporting equipment, Sloan working paper 4105. Cambridge: Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
  88. Shah, Sonali K., Sheryl Winston Smith, und E. J. Reedy. 2012. Who are user entrepreneurs? Findings on innovation, founder characteristics, and firm characteristics. Kansas: Kauffman Foundation.Google Scholar
  89. Shankar, Venkatesh, Gregory S. Carpenter, und Lakshman Krishnamurthi. 1998. Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. Journal of Marketing Research 35: 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Silic, Mario, und Andrea Back. 2014. Shadow IT. A view from behind the curtain. Computers & Security 45:274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Spencer, Jennifer W. 2003. Firms’ knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system. Evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal 24(3): 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thackston, Russell, und David Umphress. 2012. Micropreneurs: The rise of the MicroISV. IT professional 15(2): 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tietz, Robert, Pamela D. Morrison, Christian Lüthje, und Cornelius Herstatt. 2004. The process of user-innovation. A case study on user innovation in a consumer goods setting, Arbeitspapier no. 29. Hamburg: Institut für Technologie und Innovationsmanagement.Google Scholar
  94. Tilton, John E. 1971. International diffusion of technology: The case of semiconductors. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  95. Trott, Paul, und Dap Hartmann. 2009. Why ‚open innovation‘ is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management 13(4): 715–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Troxler, Peter und Maxigas. 2014. We now have the means of production, but where is my revolution? Journal of peer production 5. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/. Zugegriffen am 10.03.2018.
  97. Urban, Glen L., und Eric Von Hippel. 1988. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science 34(5): 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. West, Joel, Ammon Salter, Wim Vanhaverbeke, und Henry Chesbrough. 2014. Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy 43(5): 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wynarczyk, Pooran, Panagiotis Piperopoulos, und Maura McAdam. 2013. Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: An overview. International Small Business Journal 31(3): 240–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für SozialwissenschaftenUniversität StuttgartStuttgartDeutschland

Personalised recommendations