Advertisement

Event-History-Analysis

  • Sebastian Jäckle
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel führt in die Klasse der Event-History-Verfahren ein, die allgemein zur Analyse von Transitionsprozessen verwendet werden. Es werden die Grundlagen dieser Methode erläutert und zentrale Begriffe wie Hazard-Rate, Risk-Set oder Zensierung besprochen. Zudem werden verschiedene Arten von Event-History-Analysen unterschieden und insbesondere die drei Hauptverfahren, die nicht-parametrischen, die parametrischen sowie das semi-parametrische Cox-Modell ausführlich behandelt und deren jeweilige Vor- und Nachteile diskutiert. Des Weiteren bietet das Kapitel einen Einblick in Erweiterungen der klassischen Event-History-Verfahren wie die Analyse von Repeated Events oder Competing Risks.

Schlüsselwörter

Event-History Survival-Analysis Kaplan-Meier Cox-Modell Transitionsanalyse Hazard Ereignisanalyse Überlebenszeitanalyse 

Literatur

  1. Aalen, Odd Olai. 1994. Effects of frailty in survival analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 3(3): 227–243.  https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029400300303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agadjanian, Victor, und Ekaterina Makarova. 2003. From Soviet modernization to post-Soviet transformation: Understanding marriage and fertility dynamics in Uzbekistan. Development and Change 34(3): 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, Paul D. 1982. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology 13:61–98.  https://doi.org/10.2307/270718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, Paul D. 1990. Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology 20:93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baybeck, Brady, William D. Berry, und David A. Siegel. 2011. A strategic theory of policy diffusion via intergovernmental competition. The Journal of Politics 73(1): 232–247.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, und Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1260–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, D. Scott. 1999. Parametric models, duration dependence, and time-varying data revisited. American Journal of Political Science 43(1): 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, D. Scott, und Allan C. Stam III. 1996. The duration of interstate wars. 1816–1985. The American Political Science Review 90(2): 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett, D. Scott, und Allan C. Stam III. 1998. The declining advantages of democracy. A combined model of war outcomes and duration. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(3): 344–366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042003007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berlinski, Samuel, Torun Dewan, und Keith Dowding. 2007. The length of ministerial tenure in the United Kingdom, 1945–97. British Journal of Political Science 37(2): 245–262.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berry, Frances Stokes, und William D. Berry. 1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. The American Political Science Review 84(2): 395.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bienen, Henry, und Nicolas van de Walle. 1991. Of time and power. Leadership duration in the modern world. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, Katrin Golsch, und Götz Rohwer. 2007. Event history analysis with stata. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, Alfred Hamerle, und Karl Ulrich Mayer. 2014. Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., und Bradford S. Jones. 2004. Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M, und Byungwon Woo. 2011. Event history analysis. International encyclopedia of political science, 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: Sage. http://sk.sagepub.com/Reference/intlpoliticalscience/n202.xml. Zugegriffen am 27.06.2017.
  17. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., und Christopher J. W. Zorn. 2001. Duration models and proportional hazards in political science. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bräuninger, Thomas, Marc Debus, und Fabian Wüst. 2017. Governments, parliaments and legislative activity. Political Science Research and Methods 5(3): 529–554.  https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Browne, Eric C., John P. Frendreis, und Dennis W. Gleiber. 1984. An „Events“ approach to the problem of cabinet stability. Comparative Political Studies 17(2): 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, und Randolph M. Siverson. 1995. War and the survival of political leaders. A comparative study of regime types and political accountability. The American Political Science Review 89(4): 841–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caplan, Richard, und Anke Hoeffler. 2017. Why peace endures: An analysis of post-conflict stabilisation. European Journal of International Security 2(2): 133–152.  https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carroll, Glenn R., und Karl Ulrich Mayer. 1986. Job-shift patterns in the federal republic of Germany: The effects of social class, industrial sector, and organizational size. American Sociological Review 51(3): 323–341.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2095305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiba, Daina, Nils W. Metternich, und Michael D. Ward. 2015. Every story has a beginning, middle, and an end (but not always in that order): Predicting duration dynamics in a unified framework. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3): 515–541.  https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cleves, Mario Alberto, Roberto G. Gutierrez, William Gould, und Yulia V. Marchenko. 2010. An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. College Station: Tex.Google Scholar
  25. Coleman, James Samuel. 1981. Longitudinal data analysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Cox, David R. 1975. Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62(2): 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cox, David R., und E. Joyce Snell. 1968. A general definition of residuals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 30(2): 248–275.Google Scholar
  28. Darmofal, David. 2009. Bayesian spatial survival models for political event processes. American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 241–257.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diekmann, Andreas. 1989. Diffusion and survival models for the process of entry into marriage. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 14(1): 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Diermeier, Daniel, und Randolph T. Stevenson. 1999. Cabinet survival and competing risks. American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1051–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dowding, Keith M., und Patrick Dumont, Hrsg. 2009. The selection of ministers in Europe: Hiring and firing. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Ecker, Alejandro, und Thomas M. Meyer. 2015. The duration of government formation processes in Europe. Research & Politics 2(4): 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Elandt-Johnson, Regina C., und Norman L. Johnson. 1980. Survival models and data analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Elbers, Chris, und Geert Ridder. 1982. True and spurious duration dependence. The identifiability of the proportional hazard model. Review of Economic Studies 49:403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fleischer, Julia. 2016. Partisan and professional control: Predictors of bureaucratic tenure in Germany. Acta Politica 51(4): 433–450.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0006-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gandhi, Jennifer, und Adam Przeworski. 2007. Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies 40(11): 1279–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007305817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gasiorowski, Mark J. 1995. Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review 89(4): 882–897.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2082515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gilardi, Fabrizio, Katharina Füglister, und Stéphane Luyet. 2009. Learning from others: The diffusion of hospital financing reforms in OECD Countries. Comparative Political Studies 42(4): 549–573.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008327428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Golub, Jonathan. 2008. The study of decision-making speed in the European Union. Data, theory and methods. European Union Politics 9(1): 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gray, Robert J. 1992. Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with applications to breast cancer prognosis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(420): 942.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2290630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harrell, Frank E., Jr., Robert M. Califf, David B. Pryor, Kerry L. Lee, et al. 1982. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. Journal of the American Medical Association 247(18): 2543–2546.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hartzell, Caroline, und Matthew Hoddie. 2003. Institutionalizing peace: Power sharing and post-civil war conflict management. American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 318–332.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hildebrandt, Achim, Eva-Maria Trüdinger, und Sebastian Jäckle. 2017. Sooner or later: The influence of public opinion and religiosity on the enactment of laws recognizing same-sex unions. Journal of European Public Policy 24(8): 1191–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1228693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Horiuchi, Yusaku, Matthew Laing, und Paul’t Hart. 2015. Hard acts to follow: Predecessor effects on party leader survival. Party Politics 21(3): 357–366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hosmer, David W., Stanley Lemeshow, und Susanne May. 2008. Applied survival analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huber, John D., und Cecilia Martinez-Gallardo. 2008. Replacing cabinet ministers: Patterns of ministerial stability in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review 102(2).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808012X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hughes, Melanie M., Mona Lena Krook, und Pamela Paxton. 2015. Transnational women’s activism and the global diffusion of gender quotas. International Studies Quarterly 59(2): 357–372.  https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jäckle, Sebastian. 2011. Determinanten der Regierungsbeständigkeit in parlamentarischen Systemen. Berlin: LIT.Google Scholar
  49. Jäckle, Sebastian. 2013. Ministerial turnover in the German Länder (1991–2010). Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 7(1): 27–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-013-0144-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jäckle, Sebastian. 2015. Event-history-analyse. In Methodologie, Methoden, Forschungsdesign, 163–189. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  51. Jäckle, Sebastian, und Matthew Kerby. 2018. Temporal methods in political elite studies. In The Palgrave handbook of political elites, Hrsg. Heinrich Best und John Higley, 115–133. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_10. Zugegriffen am 31.03.2018.Google Scholar
  52. Kalbfleisch, John D., und Ross L. Prentice. 2002. The statistical analysis of failure time data. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kaplan, Edward L., und Paul Meier. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53(282): 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. King, Gary, James E. Alt, Nancy E. Burns, und Michael Laver. 1990. A unified model of cabinet dissolution in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 34(3): 846–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kleinbaum, David G., und Mitchel Klein. 2012. Survival analysis: A self-learning text, 3. Aufl. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klein, John P., und Melvin L. Moeschberger. 2003. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. 2nd ed. Statistics for biology and health. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. König, Thomas. 2008. Analysing the process of EU legislative decision-making: To make a long story short. European Union Politics 9(1): 145–165.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507085960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Laver, Michael. 2003. Government termination. Annual Review of Political Science 6(1): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lawless, Jerald F. 1982. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Mandel, Micha. 2007. Censoring and truncation. Highlighting the differences. The American Statistician 61:321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mills, Melinda. 2011. Introducing survival and event history analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Newson, Roger B. 2010. Comparing the predictive powers of survival models using Harrell’s C or Somers’ D. Stata Journal 10(3): 339–358.Google Scholar
  63. Phillips, Brian J. 2015. Enemies with benefits? Violent rivalry and terrorist group longevity. Journal of Peace Research 52(1): 62–75.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314550538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Piplani, Varun, und Caitlin Talmadge. 2016. When war helps civil–military relations: Prolonged interstate conflict and the reduced risk of coups. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60(8): 1368–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714567950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, und Anders Skrondal. 2012. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata – Volume 2: Categorical responses, counts, and survival. College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  66. Reimer, Kerstin, und Christian Barrot. 2009. Hazard-Raten-Modelle. In Methodik der empirischen Forschung, Hrsg. Sönke Albers, Daniel Klapper, Udo Konradt, Achim Walter, et al., 331–348. Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Saalfeld, Thomas. 2008. Institutions, chance, and choices. The dynamics of cabinet survival. In Cabinets and coalition bargaining. The democractic life cycle in Western Europe, Hrsg. Kaare Strom, Wolfgang C. Müller und Torbjörn Bergman, 327–368. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sagara, Issaka, Roch Giorgi, Ogobara K. Doumbo, Renaud Piarroux, et al. 2014. Modelling recurrent events: Comparison of statistical models with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals on recurrent malaria episodes data. Malaria Journal 13:293–293.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schönherr, Maximilian. 2007. Der Zufall des Sir David Cox – Ein Porträt des Meisters der Stochastik und seiner Wissenschaft (Rundfunkinterview mit Sir David Cox), Südwestrundfunk SWR2: Sendung: Montag, 8.30 Uhr. http://www.swr.de/swr2/programm/sendungen/wissen/-/id=660374/nid=660374/did=1855836/qzu6tv/index.html. Zugegriffen am 15.01.2007.
  70. Strang, David. 1991. Global patterns of decolonization. 1500–1987. International Studies Quarterly 35(4): 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Strom, Kaare, Eric C. Browne, John P. Frendreis, und Dennis W. Gleiber. 1988. Contending models of cabinet stability. The American Political Science Review 82(3): 923–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Therneau, Terry M., und Patricia M. Grambsch. 2000. Modeling survival data. Extending the Cox model. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tuma, Nancy B., und Michael T. Hannan. 1984. Social dynamics. Models and methods. Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
  74. Vermunt, Jeroen K. 1996. Log linear event history analysis. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Vermunt, Jeroen K. 1997. Log-linear models for event histories. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Warwick, Paul V. 1994. Government survival in parliamentary democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Wenzelburger, Georg, Sebastian Jäckle, und Pascal König. 2014. Weiterführende statistische Methoden für Politikwissenschaftler: Eine anwendungsbezogene Einführung mit Stata. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  78. Werner, Suzanne. 1999. The precarious nature of peace. Resolving the issues, enforcing the settlement, and renegotiating. American Journal of Political Science 43(3): 912–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Windzio, Michael. 2013. Regressionsmodelle für Zustände und Ereignisse: eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wright, Joseph. 2009. How foreign aid can foster democratization in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 552–571.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00386.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yamaguchi, Kazuo. 1991. Event history analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Ziegler, Andreas, Stefan Lange, und Ralf Bender. 2004. Überlebenszeitanalyse. Die Cox-Regression. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschau 129:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität FreiburgFreiburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations