Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Virtuelle Chirurgie

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Virtualität

Zusammenfassung

Unter dem Begriff virtuelle Chirurgie werden im aktuellen Fachdiskurs Praktiken gefasst, die in Diagnostik, Planung und Intervention maßgeblich auf dem Einsatz von Bildgebungsverfahren, Softwareanwendungen und Augmented Reality Technologien beruhen. Der Beitrag untersucht an Fallstudien wie das Verhältnis von digitalen Daten, symbolischen Operationen und Patientenkörpern virtuell gestaltet und in materielle Interventionen transformiert wird. Zudem werden bild- und medientheoretische Fragestellungen sowie handlungsbezogene Herausforderungen benannt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Anonymus. 2015a. Microsoft HoloLens. https://www.wearvision.de/microsoft-hololens. Zugegriffen am 20.10.2017.

  • Anonymus. 2015b. Scopis introduces the first mixed-reality surgical holographic navigation platform integrating Microsoft HoloLens for open and minimally-invasive spine surgery. https://navigation.scopis.com/news/holopressreleaseone. Zugegriffen am 20.10.2017.

  • Anonymus. o.A.a Complex Assembly, Done Faster. https://www.x.company/glass. Zugegriffen am 20.10.2017.

  • Anonymus. o.A.b Erleben Sie die Welt mit anderen Augen. https://www.epson.de/products/see-through-mobile-viewer/moverio-bt-300. Zugegriffen am 20.10.2017.

  • Beaulieu, Christopher F., David S. Paik, Sandy Napel, und R. B. Jeffrey. 2003. Advanced 3D display methods. In Atlas of virtual colonoscopy, Hrsg. A. Dachman, 37–44. Berlin/New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Behringer, Reinhold, und Thiemo Kastel. 2016. Augmented reality in cultural context. In Kultur und Informatik: Augmented Reality, 197–206 (9). Berlin: Verlag Werner Huelsbusch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borck, Cornelius. 2012. Das Paradox der Vertrauenskrise. Eine kleine Epistemologie von Wissen und Können in der Medizin. In Nach Feierabend 2012. Gesundheit, Hrsg. D. Gugerli, M. Hagner, C. Hirschi, A.B.. Kilcher, P. Purtschert, P. Sarasin und J. Tanner, 65–84. Berlin: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caetano da Rosa, Catarina. 2013. Operationsroboter in Aktion. Kontroverse Innovationen in der Medizintechnik. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, Scott. 2004. Still/moving. Digital imaging and medical hermeneutics. In Memory bytes: history, technology, and culture, Hrsg. L. Rabinovitz und A. Geil, 218–254. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Michael, Kathrin Friedrich, Moritz Queisner, und Christian Stein. 2016. Editorial introduction. conceptualizing screen practices: How head-mounted displays transform action and perception. MediaTropes eJournal VI(1): i-v.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Kathrin. 2012. ‚Sehkollektiv‘- Sight styles in diagnostic computed tomography. In Medical imaging and philosophy. Challenges, reflections and actions, Hrsg. H. Fangerau, R. K. Chem, I. Müller und S.-C. Wang, 163–179. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, Ian, Marta Kersten-Oertel, Simon Drouin, Jeffery Hall, Kevin Petrecca, Dante De Nigris, Daniel A. Di Giovanni, Tal Arbel, und Louis Collins. 2018. Combining intraoperative ultrasound brain shift correction and augmented reality visualizations: A pilot study of eight cases. Journal of Medical Imaging 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.2.021210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giller, C. A., J. A. Fiedler, G. J. Gagnon, und I. Paddick. 2009. Radiosurgical planning: Gamma tricks and cyber picks. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramelsberger, Gabriele. 2010. Computerexperimente, Wandel der Wissenschaft im Zeitalter des Computers. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gugerli, David. 2002. Der fliegende Chirurg. Kontexte, Problemlagen und Vorbilder der virtuellen Endoskopie. In Ganz normale Bilder. Historische Beiträge zur visuellen Herstellung von Selbstverständlichkeiten, Hrsg. D. Gugerli und B. Orland, 251–270. Zürich: Chronos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidegger, Tamas, Zoltán Benyó, und P. Kazanzides. 2009. Manufacturing the human body – the era of surgical robots. Journal of Machine Manufacturing XLIX(E2): 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher, Alaric, J. Kim Su, Sung T. Cho, Sunil Pardeshi, Seung H. Lee, Sung-Jong Eun, und Taeg K. Whangbo. 2016. Application of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality to urology. International Neurourol Journal 20(3): 172–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Gordon J. 2006. Three-dimensional imaging in radiology. In PACS. A guideto the digital revolution, Hrsg. K. J. Dreyer, D. S. Hirschorn, J. H. Thrall und A. Mehta, 447–465. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heßler, Martina, und Dieter Mersch, Hrsg. 2009. Logik des Bildlichen. Zur Kritik der ikonischen Vernunft. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterwaldner, Inge. 2013. Programmierte Operativität und operative Bildlichkeit. In Die Kunst der Systemik, Hrsg. R. Mikuláš, S. Moser und K. S. Wozonig, 77–108. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, Stefan. 1991. The manufacture of bodies in surgery. Social Studies of Science 21: 279–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoc, Jean-Michel. 2000. From human-machine interaction to human-machine cooperation. Ergonomics 43(7): 833–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, Aud S., und Frank Lindseth. 2014. Differential interventions: Images as operative tools. In The new everyday, cluster „Operative Images“, Hrsg. Ingrid Hoelzl. Februar/März 2014. http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/tne/. Zugegriffen am 27.08.2017.

  • Joyce, Kelly. 2005. Appealing images. Magnetic resonance imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge. Social Studies of Science 35(3): 437–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalender, Willi A. 2006. Computertomografie. Grundlagen, Gerätetechnologie, Bildqualität, Anwendungen. Erlangen: Publicis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten-Oertel, Marta,Ian Gerard, Simon Drouin, K. Mok, D. Sirhan, D. S. Sinclair, und D. L. Collins. 2015a. Augmented reality in neurovascular surgery: Feasibility and first uses in the operating room. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1163-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersten-Oertel, Marta, Simon Drouin, K. Mok, und Louis Collins. 2015b. Augmented reality for specific neurovascular tasks. Conference Paper October 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24601-7_10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khor Wee S., Benjamin Baker, Kavit Amin, Adrian Chan, Ketan Patel, und Jason Wong. 2016. Augmented and virtual reality in surgery – The digital surgical environment: Applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. Annals of Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.12.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipman, Alex. 2017. The era of windows mixed reality begins October 17. https://blogs.windows.com/windowsexperience/2017/10/03/the-era-of-windows-mixed-reality-begins-october-17. Zugegriffen am 20.10.2017.

  • Krämer, Sybille. 2011. Simulation und Erkenntnis. Über die Rolle computergenerierter Simulationen in den Wissenschaften. Nova Acta Leopoldina 110(377): 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, Nelson, und Steve Soechtig. 2017. Mixed reality. Experiences get more intuitive, immersive, and empowering, 48–63. Deloitte University Press. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/technology/deloitte-uk-tech-trends-2017-mixed-reality.pdf. Zugegriffen am 20.10.2017.

  • Leksell, Lars. 1971. Stereotaxis and radiosurgery. An operative system. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, Timothy, und Sha W. Xin. 2002. Authorship and surgery: The shifting ontology of the virtual surgeon. In From energy to information: Representation in science, art, and literature, Hrsg. Linda Henderson und Bruce Clarke, 283–308. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, Adrian. 2013. Programming subjects in the regime of anticipation: Software studies and subjectivity. Subjectivity 6:391. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehler-Bicher, Anett, Michael Reiß, und Lothar Steiger. 2011. Augmented reality. Theorie und Praxis. München: Oldenbourg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mentis, Helena, Amine Chellali, und Steven D. Schwaitzberg. 2014. Learning to see the body: Supporting instructional practices in laparoscopic surgical procedures. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), Apr 2014, 2113–2122. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, Paul, und Herman Colquhoun. 1999. A taxonomy of real and virtual world display integration. Mixed Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds 1:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, Kenton, et al. 2014. Touchless interaction in surgery. Communications of the ACM 57(1): 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, Yuichi, und Hideyuki Tamura. 2014. Mixed reality: Merging real and virtual worlds. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantenburg, Volker. 2016. Working images: Harun Farocki and the operational image. In Image operations. Visual media and political conflict, Hrsg. Jens Eder und Charlotte Klonk, Bd. 2017, 49–62. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queisner, Moritz. 2016. Medical screen operations: How head-mounted displays transform action and perception in surgical practice. MediaTropes eJournal VI(1): 30–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randell, Rebecca, Joanne Greenhalgh, Jon Hindmarsh, Dawn Dowding, David Jayne, Alan Pearman, Peter Gardner, Julie Croft, und Alwyn Kotze. 2014. Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: A realist process evaluation protocol, implementation science. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-52.

  • Reichle, Ingeborg, Steffen Siegel, und Achim Spelten, Hrsg. 2008. Die Wirklichkeit visueller Modelle. In Visuelle Modelle, 9–17. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, Daniel J., et al. 2006. Innovation in surgery, a historical perspective. Annals of Surgery 244(5): 686–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riva, Giuseppe. 2014. Medical clinical uses of virtual worlds. In The Oxford Handbook of virtuality, Hrsg. M. Grimshaw, 649–665. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, Richard A. 2000. Virtual endoscopy. development and evaluation using the visible human datasets. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 24:133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, Igor M., Moritz Queisner, Peter Tang, Simon Moosburner, Ole Hoepfner, Rosa Horner, Rüdiger Lohmann, und Johann Pratschke. 2017. Mixed reality in visceral surgery: Development of a suitable workflow and evaluation of intraoperative use-cases. Annals of Surgery 266(5): 706–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlich, Thomas. 2007. Surgery, science and modernity. Operating rooms and laboratories as spaces of control. History of Science 45:231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraffenberger, Hanna, und Edwin Van der Heide. 2014. Everything augmented: On the real in augmented reality. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts 6(1): 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, Cornelius. 2006. Die Praxis der Apparatemedizin: Ärzte und Technik im Operationssaal. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddharth, Vijaydeep, Sunil Kant, R. Chandrashekhar, und Shakti K. Gupta. 2014. Planning premises and design considerations for hybrid operating room. International Journal Foundation Hospital Health Care Administration 2(1): 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Lucy, und Jutta Weber. 2016. Human–machine autonomies. In Autonomous weapons systems: Law, ethics, policy, Hrsg. N. Bhuta, S. Beck, R. Geiβ, H. Liu und C. Kreβ, 75–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316597873.004.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, José. 2005. The transparent body. A cultural analysis of medical imaging. Washington: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wynsberghe, Aimee, und Chris Gastmans. 2008. Telesurgery: An ethical appraisal. Journal of Medical Ethics 34:e22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdiani, Giorgio, Mirco Pucci, und Carlo Cira. 2016. A special eyesight to a lost past: Oculus Rift, google cardboard and sketchFab to support the digital reconstruction of the St. Donato Cathedral in Arezzo, Italy. In Kultur und Informatik: Augmented Reality, 98–10. Berlin: Verlag Werner Huelsbusch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeff, Nanna. 2012. Mobile screens. The visual regime of navigation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachopoulou, Vassiliki, Christos Antypas, Harry Delis, Argyrios Tzouras, Nikolaos Salvaras, Dimitrios Kardamakis, und George Panayiotakis. 2011. Peripheral doses in patients undergoing cyberknife treatment for intracranial lesions. A single centre experience. Radiation Oncology 6:157. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, Judy, Kathryn J. Keysor, und David H. Kim. 2013. The time has arrived for national reimbursement of screening CT colonography. AJR 201(1): 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forschungskolleg „SENSING. Zum Wissen sensibler Medien“, ZeM- Brandenburgisches Zentrum für Medienwissenschaften, Potsdam, Deutschland

    Kathrin Friedrich

  2. Campus Benjamin Franklin, Klinik für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Sarah Diner

Authors
  1. Kathrin Friedrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Diner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathrin Friedrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Dawid Kasprowicz

  2. Institut für Medienwissenschaft, Ruhr-Universität Bochum Institut für Medienwissenschaft, Bochum, Germany

    Stefan Rieger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Friedrich, K., Diner, S. (2019). Virtuelle Chirurgie. In: Kasprowicz, D., Rieger, S. (eds) Handbuch Virtualität. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16358-7_19-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16358-7_19-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16358-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16358-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation