Advertisement

Formen und Funktionen von Genrebenennungen

  • Katja Hettich
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer Reference Geisteswissenschaften book series (SPREFGEIST)

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel zeigt auf, inwiefern Genrebenennungen aufgrund ihrer wesenhaften Heterogenität und Wandelbarkeit kein taxonomisches System zur Klassifikation von Filmen bereitstellen. Er beschreibt sie stattdessen als flexible Verständigungsbegriffe, deren Funktion und Bedeutung sich verändert, je nachdem, in welchen historischen, kulturellen, pragmatischen und wissenschaftlichen Kontexten sie verwendet werden.

Schlüsselwörter

Genrebenennungen Genrebegriffe Genreklassifikation Subgenres Theoretische Genres 

Literatur

  1. Altman, Rick. 1987. The American film musical. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, Rick. 1998. Reusable packaging. Generic products and the recycling process. In Refiguring American film genres, Hrsg. Nick Browne, 1–41. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Altman, Rick. 1999. Film/Genre. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Bazin, André. 1953. Le western, ou, le cinéma américain par excellence. Vorwort zu Le western, ou le cinéma américain par excellence, Hrsg. Jean-Louis Rieupeyrout, 5–16. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  5. Bazin, André. 1955. Évolution du western. Cahiers du cinéma 54:22–27.Google Scholar
  6. Bordwell, David. 1989. Making meaning. Inference and rhetoric in the interpretation of cinema. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bordwell, David. 2006. The way Hollywood tells it: Story and style in modern movies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bordwell, David, Janet Staiger, und Kristin Thompson. 1985. The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style and mode of production to 1960. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowser, Eileen. 1990. The transformation of cinema: 1907–1915. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, Noel. 2012. The Hollywood family film: A history, from Shirley Temple to Harry Potter. London/New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, Noel. 2014. The feel-good film: A case study in contemporary genre classification. The Quarterly Review of Film and Video 32(3): 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruns, John. 2008. The polyphonic film. New Review of Film and Television Studies 6:189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckland, Warren. 2009. Introduction: Puzzle plots. In Puzzle films. Complex storytelling in contemporary cinema, Hrsg. Warren Buckland, 1–12. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Casetti, Francesco. 2001. Filmgenres, Verständigungsvorgänge und kommunikativer Vertrag. montage/av 3(2): 155–173.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, Jim. 1993. Genericity in the Nineties: Eclectic irony and the new sincerity. In Film theory goes to the movies, Hrsg. Jim Collins, Hilary Radner und Ava Preacher Collins, 242–263. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Desser, David. 2012. Global noir: Genre film in the age of transnationalism. In Film genre reader IV, Hrsg. Barry Keith Grant, 628–648. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dissanayake, Wimal. 1993. Melodrama and Asian cinema. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doane, Mary Ann. 1987. The desire to desire: The woman’s film of the 1940s. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eig, Jonathan. 2003. A beautiful mind(fuck): Hollywood structures of identity. Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media 46. http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc46.2003/eig.mindfilms/index.html. Zugegriffen am 30.10.2015.
  20. Elsaesser, Thomas. 1973. Tales of sound and fury: Observations on the family melodrama. Monogram 4:2–15.Google Scholar
  21. Elsaesser, Thomas. 2009. The mind-game film. In Puzzle films. Complex storytelling in contemporary cinema, Hrsg. Warren Buckland, 13–41. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, Michel. 1974. Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  23. Fowler, Alastair. 1982. Kinds of literature. An introduction to the theory of genre and modes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gledhill, Christine, Hrsg. 1987a. Home is where the heart is. Studies in melodrama and the woman’s film. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Gledhill, Christine. 1987b. Introduction. In Home is where the heart is. Studies in melodrama and the woman’s film, Hrsg. Christine Gledhill, 1–4. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Gledhill, Christine. 2000. Rethinking genre. In Reinventing film studies, Hrsg. Linda Williams und Christine Gledhill, 221–243. London/New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  27. Gopal, Sangita, und Sujata Moorti. 2008. Introduction: Travels of Hindi song and dance. In Global Bollywood. Travels of Hindi song and dance, Hrsg. Sangita Gopal und Sujata Moorti, 1–60. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grindon, Leger. 2012. Cycles and clusters: The shape of film genre history. In Film genre reader IV, Hrsg. Barry Keith Grant, 42–59. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hediger, Vinzenz, und Patrick Vonderau. 2005. Landkarten des Vergnügens. Genre und Filmvermarktung. In Demnächst in Ihrem Kino. Grundlagen der Filmwerbung und Filmvermarktung, Hrsg. Vinzenz Hediger und Patrick Vonderau, 240–249. Marburg: Schüren.Google Scholar
  30. Hettich, Katja. 2008. Die Melancholische Komödie. Hollywood außerhalb des Mainstreams. Marburg: Schüren.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, Steven. 2006. Everything bad is good for you. How today’s popular culture is actually making us smarter. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. King, Geoff. 2002. Film comedy. London: Wallflower.Google Scholar
  33. Klein, Amanda Ann. 2011. American film cycles. Reframing genres, screening social problems & defining subculture. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  34. Klinger, Barbara. 1994. ‚Local‘ genres: The Hollywood adult film in the 1950s. In Melodrama: stage, picture, screen, Hrsg. Jacky Bratton, Jim Cook und Christine Gledhill, 134–146. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Langford, Barry. 2005. Film genre: Hollywood and beyond. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lukow, Gregory, und Steven Ricci. 1984. The ‚audience‘ goes public: Inter-textuality, genre and the responsibilities of film literary. On Film 12:29–36.Google Scholar
  37. MacArthur, Colin. 1972. Underworld USA. London: Secker & Waburg.Google Scholar
  38. MacDowell, James. 2005. The ‚quirky‘ new wave. Alternate Takes. http://www.alternatetakes.co.uk/?2005,7,7. Zugegriffen am 30.10.2015.
  39. Maltby, Richard. 2003. Genre. In Hollywood Cinema, 2. Aufl., 74–110. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Mar Azcona, María del. 2010. A genre is born: The multi-protagonist film. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. McHugh, Kathleen, und Nancy Abelmann, Hrsg. 2005. South Korean golden age melodrama: Gender, genre, and national cinema. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Musser, Charles. 1984. The travel genre in 1903–1904: Moving toward fictional narratives. Iris 2(1): 47–59.Google Scholar
  43. Naremore, James. 1998. More than night: Film noir in its contexts. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Neale, Steve. 1990. Questions of genre. Screen 31(1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neale, Steve. 1993. Melo talks: On the meaning and use of the term ‚melodrama‘ in the American trade press. Velvet Light Trap 32:66–89.Google Scholar
  46. Neale, Steve. 2000. Genre and Hollywood. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Perkins, Claire. 2012. American smart cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Quart, Alyssa. 2005. Networked: Don Roos and ‚Happy Endings‘. Film Comment 41(4): 48–51.Google Scholar
  49. Sadlier, Darlene J., Hrsg. 2009. Latin American melodrama: passion, pathos, and entertainment. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schatz, Thomas. 1981. Hollywood genres: formulas, filmmaking, and the studio system. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Scheinpflug, Peter. 2014. Formelkino. Medienwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf die Genre-Theorie und den Giallo. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schweinitz, Jörg. 2006. Film und Stereotyp: eine Herausforderung für das Kino und die Filmtheorie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sconce, Jeffrey. 2002. Irony, nihilism and the new American ‚smart‘ film. Screen 43(4): 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Staiger, Janet. 1997. Hybrid or inbred: The purity hypothesis and Hollywood genre history. Film Criticism 22(1): 5–20.Google Scholar
  55. Staiger, Janet. 2008. Film noir as male melodrama. The politics of genre labeling. In The shifting definitions of genre. Essays on labeling films, television shows and media, Hrsg. Lincoln Garaghty und Mark Jancovich, 71–91. Jefferson: McFarland.Google Scholar
  56. Thomas, Deborah. 2000. Beyond genre. In Melodrama, comedy and romance in Hollywood films. Moffat: Cameron & Hollis.Google Scholar
  57. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1970. Introduction à la littérature fantastique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  58. Tröhler, Margrit. 2007. Offene Welten ohne Helden. Plurale Figuren-Konstellationen im Film. Marburg: Schüren.Google Scholar
  59. Tudor, Andrew. 1973. Genre. In Theories of film, 131–150. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  60. Warshow, Robert. 1962[1948a]. The gangster as tragic hero. In The immediate experience. Movies, comics, theatre and other aspects of popular culture, 127–133. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  61. Warshow, Robert. 1962[1948b]. Movie chronicle: The western. In The immediate experience. Movies, comics, theatre and other aspects of popular culture, 135–154. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  62. Williams, Linda. 1998. Melodrama revised. In Refiguring American film genres. History and theory, Hrsg. Nick Browne, 42–88. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katja Hettich
    • 1
  1. 1.Romanisches SeminarRuhr-Universität BochumBochumDeutschland

Personalised recommendations