Advertisement

Altersdiversität als Organisationskompetenz: Chancen und Herausforderungen

  • Florian Kunze
  • Theresa Goecke
Living reference work entry

Later version available View entry history

Part of the Springer Reference Psychologie book series (SRP)

Zusammenfassung

Der demographische Wandel bedingt für Organisationen, dass sie sich mit zunehmend altersdiversen Belegschaftsstrukturen konfrontiert sehen. Der folgende Beitrag setzt sich damit auseinander, welche Chancen und Herausforderungen sich aus dieser Entwicklung ergeben. Auf Basis von aktuellen Ergebnissen aus der Organisations-, Management- und psychologischen Forschung werden zunächst potenzielle Auswirkungen von Altersdiversität auf die teambezogene und organisationale Leistungsfähigkeit beleuchtet. Darauf aufbauend werden konkrete Ansätze für Entscheidungsträger in Managementpositionen entwickelt, um den Herausforderungen steigender Altersdiversität in Organisationen erfolgreich zu begegnen.

Schlüsselwörter

Altersdiversität Demografischer Wandel Organisationen Management Teams 

Literatur

  1. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Third edition manual and sampler set. Redwood City: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  2. Backes-Gellner, U., & Veen, S. (2013). Positive effects of ageing and age diversity in innovative companies–large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(3), 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barak, B. (2009). Age identity: A cross-cultural global approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barling, J., Weber, T., & Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bellman, E., & Kistler, W. J. (2003). Betriebliche Sicht- und Verhaltensweisen gegenüber älteren Arbeitnehmern. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 20, 26–34.Google Scholar
  7. Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., & Spell, C. S. (2012). Reviewing diversity training: Where we have been and where we should go. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boehm, S. A., & Kunze, F. (2015). Age diversity and age climate in the workplace. In M. P. Bal, T. A. M. Kooij & D. M. Rousseau (Hrsg.), Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship (S. 33–55). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Boehm, S. A., Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2014). Spotlight on age-diversity climate: The impact of age-inclusive HR practices on firm-level outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 667–704.Google Scholar
  10. Breu, C., Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K. H. (2010). Alters-, Geschlechts- und „Tenure“ -Diversität in Verwaltungsteams – Erklären Faultlines mehr Varianz bei Teamkonflikten und Burnout als traditionelle Diversitätsindikatoren. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 64, 147–159.Google Scholar
  11. Bundesministerium des Inneren. (2011). Demografiebericht. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur demographischen Lage und künftigen Entwicklung des Landes. http://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Broschueren/2012/demografiebericht.pdf;jsessionid=5256D6DCBB4AAA6B472 B15440E341CF5.2_cid295?__blob=publicationFile. Zugegriffen am 26.01.2015.
  12. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Choi, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2010). Managing diversity in US federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Göbel, C., & Zwick, T. (2009). Age and productivity-Evidence from linked employer employee data (ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper 09–020).Google Scholar
  15. Grund, C., & Westergård-Nielsen, N. (2008). Age structure of the workforce and firm performance. International Journal of Manpower, 29(5), 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grünheid, E., & Fiedler C. (2013). Daten, Fakten, Trends zum demografischen Wandel. http://www.bib-demografie.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/DE/Broschueren/bevoelkerung_2013.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=12. Zugegriffen am 30.03.2015
  17. Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ilmakunnas, P., & Ilmakunnas, S. (2011). Diversity at the workplace: Whom does it benefit? De Economist, 159(2), 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ilmakunnas, P., Maliranta, M., & Vainiomäki, J. (2004). The roles of employer and employee characteristics for plant productivity. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(3), 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kevin Kelloway, E., Barling, J., & Helleur, J. (2000). Enhancing transformational leadership: The roles of training and feedback. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21(3), 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A., Kotter-Grühn, D., & Smith, J. (2008). Self-perceptions of aging: Do subjective age and satisfaction with aging change during old age? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(6), 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kunze, F., & Böhm, S. A. (2013). Research on age diversity in the workforce – Current trends and future research directions. The SAGE Handbook of Aging, Work and Society, 41, 27–49.Google Scholar
  27. Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2010). Age-based faultlines and perceived productive energy: The moderation of transformational leadership. Small Group Research, 41(5), 593–620. doi:10.1177/1046496410366307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kunze, F., Böhm, S., & Bruch, H. (2011). Age diversity, age discrimination, and performance consequences – A cross organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 264–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kunze, F., Böhm, S., & Bruch, H. (2013). Organizational performance consequences of age diversity: Inspecting the role of diversity-friendly HR policies and top managers’ negative age stereotypes. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 413–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kunze, F., Raes, A. M. L., & Bruch, H. (2015). It matters how old you feel: Antecedents and performance consequences of average relative subjective age in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1511–1526.Google Scholar
  31. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.Google Scholar
  32. Lawrence, B. S. (1988). New wrinkles in the theory of age: Demography, norms, and performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyer, B., & Glenz, A. (2013). Team faultline measures a computational comparison and a new approach to multiple subgroups. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 393–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morgeson, F. P. (2005). The external leadership of self-managing teams: intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. OECD. (2009). Deutschland: Anteil der „inaktiven“ Bevölkerung ab 65 Jahre an der gesamten Erwerbsbevölkerung von 2000 bis 2050. In Statista – Das Statistik-Portal. http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/14177/umfrage/deutschland-anteil-rentner-an-erwerbsbevoelkerung/. Zugegriffen am 26.01.2015.
  38. Pelled, L. H., Xin, K. R., & Weiss, A. M. (2001). No es como mí: Relational demography and conflict in a Mexican production facility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Settersten, R. A., Jr. (1997). The salience of age in the life course. Human Development, 40(5), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Strack, R., Baier, J., & Fahlander, A. (2008). Managing demographic risk. Harvard Business Review, 86(2), 119–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.Google Scholar
  42. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Hrsg.), Psychology of intergroup relations (S. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Timmerman, T. A. (2000). Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Research, 31(5), 592–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Knippenberg, D., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wegge, J., Roth, C., & Schmidt, K. H. (2008). Eine aktuelle Bilanz der Vor- und Nachteile altersgemischter Teamarbeit. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 10(3), 30–43.Google Scholar
  48. Wei, L., & Lau, C. (2012). Effective teamwork at the top: The evidence from China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(9), 1853–1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zacher, H., & Gielnik, M. M. (2012). Organisational age cultures: The interplay of chief executive officers’ age and attitudes toward younger and older employees. International small business journal. doi:0266242612463025.Google Scholar
  50. Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management journal, 32(2), 353–376.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität KonstanzKonstanzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations