Advertisement

Multinationale Unternehmen

Living reference work entry
  • 429 Downloads
Part of the Springer Reference Wirtschaft book series (SRW)

Zusammenfassung

Im Fokus des Artikels stehen drei zentrale methodologische Problemstellungen der Forschung über multinationale Unternehmen: erstens die Auswahl des Untersuchungsfeldes und Fragen des Feldzugangs bei der Forschung, zweitens die Sicherung der Äquivalenz der eigenen Begriffe und Indikatoren in einem multinationalen und multikulturellen Forschungskontext sowie drittens die Bildung von und Kooperation in multinationalen Forschungsteams. Der Artikel stellt kurz die Grundzüge der Forschungsliteratur über multinationale Unternehmen dar und diskutiert dann die relevante methodologische Literatur aus der Organisations- und Arbeitssoziologie, Betriebswirtschaft und Wirtschaftsgeographie.

Schlüsselwörter

International vergleichende Forschung kulturvergleichende Forschung Fallauswahl Äquivalenzproblem Internationale Forschungsteams 

Literatur

  1. Ackroyd, Stephen, und Paul Thompson. 1999. Organizational misbehaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, Nancy. 1983. A typology of management studies involving culture. Journal of International Business Studies 14(2): 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almond, Phil, und Anthony Ferner, Hrsg. 2006. American multinationals in Europe. Managing employment relations across national borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, Christopher A., und Sumantra Ghoshal. 1989. Managing across borders. The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard University Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beaverstock, Jonathan. 2008. Transnational elites in the city: British highly-skilled inter-company transferees in New York city’s financial district. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31(2): 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bechtle, Günter. 1991. Strategieanalyse eines multinationalen Konzerns als Methode – Methode als Strategie. In International vergleichende Forschung. Fragestellungen, Methoden und Ergebnisse, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich und Gert Schmidt, 130–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Becker-Ritterspach, Florian, und Christoph Dörrenbächer. 2011. An organizational politics perspective on intra-firm competition in multinational corporations. Management International Review 51(4): 533–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, John. 1990. Imposed etics, emics, and derived etics: Their conceptual and operational status in cross-cultural psychology. In Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate, Hrsg. Thomas Headland, Kenneth Pike und Marvin Harris, 84–99. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Birke, Peter, und Nicole Mayer-Ahuja. 2016. Sekundäranalyse qualitativer Organisationsdaten. In Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung, Hrsg. Wenzel Matiaske, Stefan Liebig und Sophie Rosenbohm. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Birkinshaw, Julian. 2001. Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In The Oxford handbook of international business, Hrsg. Alan Rugman und Thomas Brewer, 380–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyer, Robert, Elsie Charron, Ulrich Jürgens, und Steven Tolliday, Hrsg. 1998. Between imitation and innovation. The transfer and hybridization of productive model in the international automotive industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brannick, Teresa, und David Coghlan. 2007. In defense of being ‚native‘. The case of insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods 10(1): 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brislin, Richard. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1(3): 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chidlow, Agnieszka, Emmanuelle Plakoyiannaki, und Catherine Welch. 2014. Translation in cross-language international business research: Beyond equivalence. Journal of International Business Studies 45(5): 562–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, Erik. 1977. Expatriate communities. Current Sociology 24(3): 5–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collinson, Simon, und Alan Rugman. 2010. Case selection biases in management research: The implications for international business studies. European Journal of International Management 4(5): 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delaney, Kevin. 2007. Methodological dilemmas and opportunities in interviewing organizational elites. Sociology Compass 1(2): 208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demes, Helmut. 1994. Beruflichkeit in Japan. Strukturen und Tendenzen. In Gelernte Karriere. Bildung und Berufsverlauf in Japan, Hrsg. Helmut Demes und Walter Georg, 257–284. München: Iudicium.Google Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, Paul, und Walter Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dörrenbächer, Christoph. 2006. Mikropolitik in multinationalen Unternehmen: Konturen eines neuen Forschungsfeldes. In Transnationale Konzerne. Ein neuer Organisationstyp, Hrsg. Ursula Mense-Petermann und Gabriele Wagner, 123–152. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dörrenbächer, Christoph, und Mike Geppert. 2006. Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations: Current debates, re-framing, and contributions of this special issue. Journal of International Management 12(3): 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drexel, Ingrid. 1997. The relationship between education and employment in German industrial sociology. In Education and work in Great Britain, Germany and Italy, Hrsg. Anette Jobert, Catherine Marry, Lucie Tanguy und Helen Rainbird, 76–92. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Dunning, John. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies 29(1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunning, John, und Sariana Lundan. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Edwards, Tony. 1998. Multinationals, labour management and the process of reverse diffusion: A case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management 9(4): 696–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edwards, Tony, Phil Almond, und Trevor Colling. 2011. Fleas on the backs of elephants: Researching the multinational company. In Rethinking the case study in international business and management research, Hrsg. Rebecca Piekkari und Catherine Welch, 411–430. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Edwards, Tony, Paul Marginson, und Anthony Ferner. 2013. Multinational companies in cross-national context: Integration, differentiation, and the interaction between MNCS and nation states: Introduction to a special issue of the ILRReview. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 66(3): 547–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellguth, Peter, Susanne Kohaut, und Iris Möller. 2016. Das IAB-Betriebspanel: (Analyse-) Potenzial und Datenzugang. In Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung, Hrsg. Wenzel Matiaske, Stefan Liebig und Sophie Rosenbohm. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Ferner, Anthony, Javier Quintanilla, und Carlos Sanchez-Runde, Hrsg. 2006. Multinationals, institutions, and the construction of transnational practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  30. Fletcher, Margaret, und Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki. 2011. Case selection in international business: Key issues and common misconceptions. In Rethinking the case study in international business and management research, Hrsg. Rebecca Piekkari und Catherine Welch, 171–191. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Fuchs, Martina. 2014. Worldwide knowledge? Global firms, local labour and the region. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  32. Gebel, Tobias, und Sophie Rosenbohm. 2016. Forschungsdatenmanagement in der Organisationsforschung. In Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung, Hrsg. Wenzel Matiaske, Stefan Liebig und Sophie Rosenbohm. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Geppert, Mike, und Christoph Dörrenbächer. 2014. Politics and power within multinational corporations: Mainstream studies, emerging critical approaches and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews 16(2): 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geppert, Mike, und Michael Mayer, Hrsg. 2006. Global, national and local practices in multinational companies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. Gerhart, Barry. 2008. Cross cultural management research. Assumptions, evidence and suggested directions. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management 8(3): 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gerring, John. 2007. Case study research. Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ghoshal, Sumantra, und Eleanor Westney. 2005. Introduction and overview of the second edition. In Organization theory and the multinational corporation, Hrsg. Sumantra Ghoshal und Eleanor Westney, 1–19. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Goodall, Keith, und John Roberts. 2003. Repairing managerial knowledge-ability over distance. Organization Studies 24(7): 1153–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hantrais, Linda. 2009. International comparative research. Theory, methods and practice. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Harzing, Anne-Wil. 2004. Strategy and structure of multinational companies. In International human resource management, Hrsg. Anne-Wil Harzing und Joris van Ruysseveldt, 33–64. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Harzing, Anne-Wil, et al. 2005. Does the use of English-language questionnaires in cross-national research obscure national differences? International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management 5(2): 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harzing, Anne-Wil, Sebastian Reiche, und Markus Pudelko. 2013. Challenges in international survey research: A review with illustrations and suggested solutions for best practice. European Journal of International Management 7(1): 112–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hedlund, Gunnar. 1986. The hypermodern MNC – A heterarchy? Human Resource Management 25(1): 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heidenreich, Martin. 1991. Verallgemeinerungsprobleme in der international vergleichenden Organisationsforschung. In International vergleichende Forschung. Fragestellungen, Methoden und Ergebnisse, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich und Gert Schmidt, 48–66. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  45. Heidenreich, Martin, und Gert Schmidt, Hrsg. 1991. International vergleichende Forschung. Fragestellungen, Methoden und Ergebnisse. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Hennink, Monique. 2008. Language and communication in cross-cultural qualitative research. In Doing cross-cultural research. Ethical and methodological perspectives, Hrsg. Pranee Liamputtong, 21–33. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Herod, Andrew. 1999. Reflections on interviewing foreign elites: Praxis, positionality, validity, and the cult of the insider. Geoforum 30(4): 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut. 1998. Organisation und Koordination eines transnationalen Unternehmensnetzwerks. In Globale Produktion und Industriearbeit, Hrsg. Mechthild von Behr und Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen, 37–62. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  49. Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut. 2009. Multinationale Unternehmen. In Handbuch Arbeitssoziologie, Hrsg. Fritz Böhle, Günther Voß und Günther Wachtler, 597–618. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Hofstede, Geert. 1984. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. House, Robert, Paul Hanges, Mansour Javidan, Peter Dorfman, und Vipin Gupta. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Irvine, Fiona, Gwerfyl Roberts, und Caroline Bradbury-Jones. 2008. The researcher as insider versus the researcher as outsider: Enhancing rigour through language and cultural sensitivity. In Doing cross-cultural research, Hrsg. Pranee Liamputtong, 35–48. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jürgens, Ulrich. 1991. Industrielle Restrukturierung und Wandel des betrieblichen Arbeitseinsatzes: Methodisches Design und ausgewählte Ergebnisse eines internationalen zwischenbetrieblichen Vergleichs westlicher Automobilkonzerne. In International vergleichende Forschung. Fragestellungen, Methoden und Ergebnisse, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich und Gert Schmidt, 190–210. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  54. Jürgens, Ulrich, und Martin Krzywdzinski. 2013. Breaking off from local bounds: Human resource management practices of national players in the BRIC countries. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 13(2): 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jürgens, Ulrich, und Martin Krzywdzinski. 2016. New worlds of work. Varieties of work in car factories in the BRIC countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kennedy, Paul. 2004. Making global society: Friendship networks among transnational professionals in the building design industry. Global Networks 4(2): 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kogut, Bruce, und Udo Zander. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24(4): 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kostova, Tatiana. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review 24(2): 308–324.Google Scholar
  59. Kostova, Tatiana, Kendall Roth, und Tina M. Dacin. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. The Academy of Management Review 33(4): 994–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kristensen, Peer Hull, und Jonathan Zeitlin. 2005. Local players in global games. The strategic constitution of a multinational corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Leblanc, Richard, und Mark Schwartz. 2007. The black box of board process: Gaining access to a difficult subject. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(5): 843–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lervik, Jon Erland. 2011. The single MNC as a research site. In Rethinking the case study in international business and management research, Hrsg. Rebecca Piekkari und Catherine Welch, 229–250. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  63. Leung, Kwok. 2008. Methods and measurement in cross-cultural management. In The handbook of cross-cultural management research, Hrsg. Peter Smith, Mark Peterson und David Thomas, 59–73. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liamputtong, Pranee. 2008. Doing research in a cross-cultural context: Methodological and ethical challenges. In Doing cross-cultural research. Ethical and methodological perspectives, Hrsg. Pranee Liamputtong, 3–20. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lincoln, James, und Arne Kalleberg. 1990. Culture, control and commitment. A study of work organization and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Marschan-Piekkari, Rebecca, Catherine Welch, Heli Penttinen, und Marja Tahvanainen. 2004. Interviewing in the multinational corporation: Challenges of the organizational context. In Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business, Hrsg. Rebecca Marschan-Piekkari und Catherine Welch, 244–263. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McSweeney, Brendan. 2008. Cultural diversity within nations. In Remaking management. Between global and local, Hrsg. Chris Smith, Brendan McSweeney und Robert Fitzgerald, 61–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mense-Petermann, Ursula. 2012. Multinationals, transnationals, global players. In Handbuch Organisationstypen, Hrsg. Maja Apelt und Veronika Tacke, 43–61. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mense-Petermann, Ursula. 2014. Bridging the Differences. Die Arbeit des boundary spanning und ihre Regulierung in Transnationalen Unternehmen. In Vielfalt und Zusammenhalt. Verhandlungen des 36. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie, Bd. I, Hrsg. Martina Löw, 297–311. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  70. Michailova, Snejina. 2004. Contextualising fieldwork: Reflections on conducting research in Eastern Europe. In Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business, Hrsg. Rebecca Marschan-Piekkari und Catherine Welch, 365–383. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  71. Milliman, John, und Mary-Ann von Glinow. 1998. Research and publishing issues in large scale cross-national studies. Journal of Managerial Psychology 13(3–4): 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Morgan, Glenn. 2005. Understanding multinational corporations. In The Oxford handbook of work and organization, Hrsg. Stephen Ackroyd, Rosemary Batt, Paul Thompson und Pamela Tolbert, 554–576. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Morgan, Glenn, und Peer-Hull Kristensen. 2006. The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations 59(11): 1467–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pflüger, Jessica, Hans J. Pongratz, und Rainer Trinczek. 2016. Fallstudien in der Organisationsforschung. In Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung, Hrsg. Wenzel Matiaske, Stefan Liebig und Sophie Rosenbohm. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  75. Piekkari, Rebecca, Catherine Welch, und Eriikka Paavilainen. 2009. The case study as disciplinary convention. Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods 12(3): 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Podsakoff, Philip, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, und Nathan Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pongratz, Hans J., und Rainer Trinczek, Hrsg. 2010. Industriesoziologische Fallstudien. Entwicklungspotenziale einer Forschungsstrategie. Berlin: sigma.Google Scholar
  78. Pudelko, Markus, und Anne-Wil Harzing. 2008. Standardization towards headquarters practices, standardization towards global best practices and localization. Organizational Dynamics 37(4): 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ramamurti, Ravi, und Jitendra V. Singh. 2009. Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roth, Kendall, und Tatiana Kostova. 2003. The use of the multinational corporation as a research context. Journal of Management 29(6): 883–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sackmann, Sonja. 1997. Introduction. In Cultural complexity in organizations. Inherent contrasts and contradictions, Hrsg. Sonja Sackmann, 1–13. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Sami, Asta. 2011. International research teams and collective case studies: An abductive approach. In Rethinking the case study in international business and management research, Hrsg. Rebecca Piekkari und Catherine Welch, 431–452. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  83. Schaffer, Bryan, und Christine Riordan. 2003. A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods 6(2): 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schmidt, Gert. 1991. Anmerkungen zur Fast-Unmöglichkeit solider international vergleichender Organisationsforschung – Anstöße eines deutsch-italienischen Forschungsprojektes. In International vergleichende Forschung. Fragestellungen, Methoden und Ergebnisse, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich und Gert Schmidt, 157–169. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  85. Steyaert, Chris, und Maddy Janssens. 2012. Multilingual scholarship and the paradox of translation and language in management and organization studies. Organization 20(1): 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thomas, Robert. 1993. Interviewing important people in big companies. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(1): 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thomas, Robyn, Janne Tienari, Annette Davies, und Susan Meriläinen. 2009. Let’s talk about ‚us‘. A reflexive account of a cross-cultural research collaboration. Journal of Management Inquiry 18(4): 313–324.Google Scholar
  88. Usunier, Jean-Claude. 1998. International and cross-cultural management research. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  89. Vaus, David. 2008. Comparative and cross-national designs. In The SAGE handbook of social research methods, Hrsg. Pertti Alasuutari, Leonard Bickmann und Julia Brannen, 249–265. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vernon, Raymond. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Westwood, Robert. 2004. Towards a postcolonial research paradigm in international business and comparative management. In Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business, Hrsg. Rebecca Marschan-Piekkari und Catherine Welch, 56–83. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  92. Winter, Johannes. 2009. Zwischen Hierarchie und Heterarchie. Kompetenzveränderungen in Tochterbetrieben internationaler Automobilunternehmen am Standort Polen. Berlin: LIT.Google Scholar
  93. Xian, Huiping. 2008. Lost in translation? Language, culture and the roles of translator in cross-cultural management research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 3(3): 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yang, Zhilin, Xuehua Wang, und Chenting Su. 2006. A review of research methodologies in international business. International Business Review 15(6): 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yin, Robert. 1994. Case study research. Design and methods, 2. Aufl. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB)BerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations