Skip to main content

Gründerteams

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Entrepreneurship

Zusammenfassung

Many entrepreneurs begin entirely on their own. But empirically, teams of entrepreneurs are more likely to start successful businesses than solo entrepreneurs. This is particularly true for high-tech start-ups. There is less consensus in the existing literature on the optimal composition of founding teams. While there are some good theoretical arguments favoring team heterogenity in terms of competences and experiences, there is also a cost of heterogenous entreprenurial teams: Slower decision making and more potential for conflicts. Furthermore, there are many different criteria to judge the heterogenity of an entrepreneurial team, e.g. age, gender, nationality or personal values. One important empirical finding is that entrepreneurs show homophily when selecting team members, i.e. they prefer team mates who are similar to themselves. Another important finding refers to the way a team interacts. The more cohesion there is i.e. the more the individual team members want to work together and avoid personal conflicts, the more successful the start-up will be. Finally, empirical studies show that the structure of founder teams frequently changes over time. Thus, the phenomenon of entrepreneurial teams is dynamic in nature, not static.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Blackford, M. G. 1991. A history of small business in America. New York: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., P. Preisendörfer, und R. Ziegler. 1996. Der Erfolg neugegründeter Betriebe – Eine empirische Studie zu den Chancen und Risiken von Unternehmensgründungen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. C. 1982. The entrepreneur. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G. N., und S. H. Hanks. 1994. Founder competence, the environment, and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 18:77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-H. 2007. Entrepreneurial leadership and new ventures: Creativity in entrepreneurial teams. Creativity and Innovation Management 16:239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., und N. Moray. 2004. A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing 19:55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. 2000. Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men- and women-owned small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 38:37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., und C. M. Daily. 1997. Entrepreneurial teams. In: Entrepreneurship 2000, Hrsg. D. L. Sexton und R. W Smilor. Chicago: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., P. P. McDougall, J. G. Covin, und D. R. Dalton. 2002. Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management 28:387–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D., A. W. Pearson, und A. C. Amason. 2002. Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams. Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing 17:365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., und D. C. Hambrick. 1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul: Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, L. N., C. E. Stevens, und N. L. Brenner. 2006. Forced to play by the rules? Theorizing how mixed-sex founding teams benefit women entrepreneurs in male-dominated contexts. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 30:623–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grichnik, D., M. Brettel, C. Koropp, und R. Mauer. 2010. Entrepreneurship. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., und P. A. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its managers. Academy of Management Review 9:193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. A. 2008. Towards a theory of entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Venturing 23: 613–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsdiek, D. 1987. Unternehmensgründung als Folgeinnovation – Struktur, Hemmnisse und Erfolgsbedingungen der Gründung industrieller innovativer Unternehmen. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, J. B., und J. C. Shuman. 1990. Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 14:7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulicke, M., und U. Wupperfeld. 1996. Beteiligungskapital für junge Technologieunternehmen – Ergebnisse eines Modellversuchs – Projektbegleitung zum Modellversuch „Beteiligungskapital für junge Technologieunternehmen“. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechler, T. 2001. Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics 16:263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, C., und P. Witt. 2013. Welche Arten von Erfahrung helfen bei der erfolgreichen Gründung eines Unternehmens? Die Betriebswirtschaft 73:183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, P. 2004. Humankapital des Gründers und Erfolg der Unternehmensgründung. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathusius, K. 1994. Typologie unternehmerischer Partnerschaften, Hrsg. D. Müller-Böling und K. Nathusius. Unternehmerische Partnerschaften, 11–32. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. 1988. Understanding and encouraging entrepreneurship internationally. Journal of Small Business Management 43:55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. 1987. Entrepreneurship reconsidered: The team as hero. Harvard Business Review 87:77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M., H. E. Aldrich, und N. M. Carter. 2003. The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review 68:195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schjoedt, L., und S. Kraus. 2009. Entrepreneurial teams: Definition and performance factors. Management Research News 32:513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinkühler, R.-H. 1994. Technologiezentren und Erfolg von Unternehmensgründungen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szyperski, N., und K. Nathusius. 1977. Probleme der Unternehmensgründung. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., A. Lockett, M. Wright, und P. Westhead. 2003. Entrepreneurial founder teams: Factors associated with member entry and exit. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 27:107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicher, H. 1992. Innovative Teamgründungen – Entwicklung, Bedeutung, Probleme. Amersbek bei Hamburg: Verlag an der Lottbek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippler, A. 1998. Innovative Unternehmensgründungen in Deutschland und den USA. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wupperfeld, U. 1996. Strategien und Management von Beteiligungsgesellschaften im deutschen Seed-Capital-Markt – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung von 33 Beteiligungsgesellschaften und Banken. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40:185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Witt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this entry

Cite this entry

Witt, P. (2015). Gründerteams. In: Faltin, G. (eds) Handbuch Entrepreneurship. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05263-8_30-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05263-8_30-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05263-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics