A Startup Cockpit for the Proof-of-Concept

Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Springer Reference Wirtschaft book series (SRW)


More and more innovative new ventures step away from the traditional business plan centred model and follow the “Lean Startup Idea”. This paper introduces a measurement tool – the Startup Cockpit – that helps startups on their way from an idea-based organization to a company with a profit-generating business model. It is based on the Customer Development model of Blank (The four steps to epiphany. San Mateo, 2006), the Lean Startup methodology of Ries (The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business, 2011), and Maurya (Running lean – Iterate from plan A to a plan that works, 2nd edn. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2012), the Lean Analytics concept of Croll and Yoskowitz (Use data to build a better startup faster. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2013) and Faltin’s ideas (Brains versus capital: Entrepreneurship for everyone – Lean, smart, simple. Berlin: Stiftung Entrepreneurship, 2013, Kopf schlart, simple. München: Carl Hanser Verlag, 2008). All of those authors introduced a number of crucial processes and meta-principles that promote successful business model development for startups.

In an innovation-driven market a business plan is not always the instrument of choice in the early days of a business. Many Internet startups have established a key performance indicators (KPI) oriented process and successfully refined their business model or, as Faltin calls it, the entrepreneurial design (cp. Kopf schlovation-dri. München: Carl Hanser Verlag, 2008). This paper analyses the foundations of the Lean Startup process: the discovery-driven planning and the hypotheses-driven planning approach and the application of those principles in Ries’ Lean Startup methodology and Blank’s Customer Development model. A business plan still is a necessary tool. But it comes later in the startup process, after the proof-of-concept.

In our research we found patterns in the usage of numbers/metrics/KPIs to support the business model design process – a Startup Cockpit seems to be within reach. But it is often said that “every entrepreneur is unique”. That makes it difficult to define a “one-size-fits-all”-set of KPIs that helps startups from different industries and in different development stages. Nevertheless, a generic Startup Cockpit can be outlined. But according to our findings it has to be adjusted to each startup’s situation. The main determinants are the development stage, the business model, the strategy, and the financing structure.

We prefer the term “cockpit” over “dashboard” as the later has become directly linked to online business models whereas our approach is to find a generic approach to manage the process from an idea to the proof-of-concept. In the same way every airplane pilot and every car driver only tracks a selected set of information such as speed, engine temperature, and gasoline, an entrepreneur has to think about and find those elements of information that best reflect the core of his or her business model to achieve a better understanding of the process to the proof-of-concept.


Business model design Startup cockpit Lean startup KPI metrics Proof-of-concept 


  1. Blank, S.G. 2006. The four steps to epiphany. San Mateo.Google Scholar
  2. Blank, S.G., and B. Dorf. 2012. The startup owner’s manual – The step-by-step guide for building a great company, 1st ed. Pescadero: K&S Ranch.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, B., and P. Vlaskovits. 2010. The entrepreneur’s guide to customer development. E-book Kindle version self-published. Last Access 07.06.2017.
  4. Cristensen, C. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma – When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Croll, A., and B. Yoskowitz. 2013. Use data to build a better startup faster. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  6. Drucker, P. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenmann, T., E. Ries, and S. Dillard. 2011. Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: The lean startup. Harvard Case Collection December 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Ernst & Young. 2012. Globalizing venture capital.Google Scholar
  9. Faltin, G. 2008. Kopf schlägt Kapital. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faltin, G. 2013. Brains versus capital: Entrepreneurship for everyone – Lean, smart, simple. Berlin: Stiftung Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
  11. Faltin, G., and S. Ripsas. 2011. The entrepreneurial design as the core aspect of Entrepreneurship. Unpublished english version based on “Das Gestalten von Geschäftsmodellen als Kern des Entrepreneurship”. Working paper institute of management Berlin 04/2011.Google Scholar
  12. Fowler, M., and J. Highsmith. 2001. The Agile Manifesto. See Last Access 07.06.2017.
  13. Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 2012. The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research, 7th ed. Originally published 1967. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Hannon, P.D., and A. Atherton. 1997. Small firm success and the art of orienteering: The value of plans, planning, and strategic awareness in the competitive small firm. Journal of small Business and Enterprise Development 5(2):102–119.Google Scholar
  15. Hayek, F.A. 2002. Competition as a discovery procedure. Trans. from the original Hayek, 1968 by Marcellus S. Snow. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9–23.Google Scholar
  16. Herrmann, B.L., M. Marmer, E. Dogrultan, and D. Holtschke. 2012. Startup ecosystem report 2012, Part One. Last Access 07.06.2017.
  17. Kane, T. 2010. The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction. Kauffman Foundation Research Series: Firm Formation and Economic Growth.Google Scholar
  18. Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard–measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70:71–79.Google Scholar
  19. Kenney, M., and J. Zysmann. 2017. The rise of the platform economy. ISSUES in Science and Technology XXXII(3), Spring 2016. Last Access 07.06.2017.
  20. Kirzner, I.M. 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Knight, F.H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Hart, Schaffner & Marx/Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  22. Marmer, M., B.L. Herrmann, E. Dogrultan, and R. Berman. 2012. Startup genome report extra on premature scaling. Last Access 07.06.2017.
  23. Mauer, R., and D. Grichnik. 2011. Dein Markt, das unbekannte Wesen: Zum Umgang mit Marktunsicherheit als Kern des Entrepreneurial Marketing. In Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue on Entrepreneurial Marketing, 59–82.Google Scholar
  24. Maurya, A. 2012. Running lean – Iterate from plan A to a plan that works, 2nd ed. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  25. Maurya, A. 2013a. Innovation accounting. Accessed 15.07.2014.
  26. Maurya, A. 2013b. 3 rules to actionable metrics in a lean startup. Last Access 01.04.2013.
  27. McClure, D. 2007. Startup metrics for pirates: AARRR!. Last Access 07.06.2017.
  28. McGrath, R.G., and I.C. MacMillan. 1995. Discovery driven planning. Harvard Business Review 73:44.Google Scholar
  29. Mintzberg, H. 1990. The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 11 (3): 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mintzberg, H., and J. Waters. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal 257–272. Chichester: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  31. Müller-Stewens, G., and C. Lechner. 2011. Strategisches management, 4th ed. Stuttgart: Schäffer Poeschel.Google Scholar
  32. Mullins, J., and R. Komisar. 2009. Getting to plan B: Breaking through to a better business model. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  33. Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur. 2010. Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ries, E. 2008. Principles of lean startups, presentation for maples investments. Online available at: Last Access 07.06.2017.
  36. Ries, E. 2011. The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  37. Ripsas, S., and S. Tröger. 2014. Deutscher Startup Monitor 2014. Berlin: Published by KPMG Deutschland.Google Scholar
  38. Ripsas, S., and H. Zumholz. 2011. Die Bedeutung von Business Plänen in der Nachgründungsphase. Corporate Finance Biz 07:435–444.Google Scholar
  39. Ripsas, S., J. Vossler, and C. Tegge. 2013. Lean business model development for startups – The case of Instagram. Unpublished working paper. Berlin School of Economics and Law.Google Scholar
  40. Sarasvathy, S. 2008. Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarasvathy, S., and N. Dew. 2005. New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 15(5):533–565, Springer.Google Scholar
  42. SBA Office of Advocacy. 2012. Frequently asked questions. U.S. small business administration, Office of advocacy. Online available at: Last Access 17.07.2012.
  43. Sinek, S. 2009. Start with WHY. Portfolio.Google Scholar
  44. Sosna, M., R. Trevinyo-Rodriguez, and S. Ramakrishna Velamuri. 2010. Business model innovation through trial-and- error learning: The Naturhouse case. Long Range Planning 43:383–407, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  45. Stähler, P. 2001. Geschäftsmodelle in der digitalen Ökonomie: Merkmale, Strategien und Auswirkungen. Academic Dissertation, University of St. Gallen HSG.Google Scholar
  46. Stevenson, H., M.J. Roberts, and H.I. Grousbeck. 1994. New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Boston: IRWIN.Google Scholar
  47. Stewart, D.W., P.N. Shamdasni, and D.W. Rook. 2007. Focus groups: Theory and practice, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BerlinGermany
  2. 2.BerlinGermany
  3. 3.BigBoxBerlin 15qm GmbHBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations