Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die zwiegespaltene nation of immigrants

Einwanderungspolitik zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung

Book cover Handbuch Politik USA

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften

  • 168 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der politische Umgang mit dem Thema Immigration steht in den USA in einem Spannungsverhältnis zwischen dem Selbstverständnis als Einwanderernation, wirtschaftlichen Interessen und xenophobischen Tendenzen. So hat Washington zwar die Einwanderung prinzipiell gefördert, andererseits dabei immer wieder einzelne Gruppen diskriminiert. Die Attraktivität der USA als beliebtestes Auswanderungsziel weltweit ist dennoch ungebrochen. Mit zunehmendem politischem Gewicht der migrantischen Bevölkerung erwächst langfristig die Chance auf eine umfassende Reform der Einwanderungspolitik. Unter dem immigrationsfeindlichen Präsidenten Donald Trump wird dies aber nicht realisierbar sein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tatsächlich stellten 1950 die 200.000 registrierten braceros nur ein Fünftel aller landwirtschaftlichen Arbeiter mit Migrationshintergrund dar. Der Rest hielt sich illegal im Land auf.

Literatur

  • American Civil Liberties Union. 2014. SB1070 at the Supreme Court. We Vow to Fight. https://www.aclu.org/whats-stake-sb-1070-supreme-court-0. Zugegriffen am 05.02.2014.

  • American Immigration Council. 2016. How the United States immigration system works. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, Rafael. 2019. Hispanic Caucus boasts record membership in new Congress. The Hill. 1. Februar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarota, Steven A., Karen Zeigler, und Jason Richwine. 2018. Births to legal and illegal immigrants in the U.S. A look at health insurance coverage among new mothers by legal status at the state and local level. Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies. 9. Oktober.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilluffo, Anthony, und Richard Fry. 2019. An early look at the 2020 electorate. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. 30. Januar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enchautegui, María E., Stephan Lindner, und Erika Poethig. 2013. Understanding the economic and fiscal impacts of immigration reform. A guide to current studies and possible expansions. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaccia, Donna R. 2012. Foreign relations. American immigration in global perspective. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, Michael, Adam Looney, und Harrison Marks. 2012. The U.S. immigration system. Potential benefits of reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Hamilton Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, William A., und Ruth Ellen Wasem. 2016. U.S. immigration policy: Chart book of key trends. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstad, Jens Manuel, Jeffrey S. Passel, und DʼVera Cohn. 2019. 5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. 12. Juni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, James. 2011. U.S. Naturalizations. 2011. Washington, DC.: Department of Homeland Security (Annual Flow Report). April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMay, Michael C. 2006. Guarding the gates. Immigration and national security. Westport/London: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Mark Hugo, und Anna Brown. 2014. Hispanics prioritize legalization for unauthorized immigrants over citizenship. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Mark Hugo, und Paul Taylor. 2012. Latino voters in the 2012 election. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, Gustavo, Kristen Bialik, und Jynnah Radford. 2018. Key findings about U.S. immigrants. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. 30. November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Susan F. 2011. A nation of immigrants. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. 2017. The partisan divide on political values grows even wider sharp shifts among democrats on aid to needy, race, immigration. Washington, DC. 5. Oktober.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, Marc R., Jerome P. Bjelopera, und Kristin M. Finklea. 2013. Border security. understanding threats at U.S. borders. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytz, Henriette. 2012. Konservative unter Anpassungsdruck. Die republikanische Partei vor den Wahlen 2012. SWP-Aktuell 32. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Audrey, und Nicole Prchal Svajlenka. 2013. Immigration facts. Deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA). Washington, DC: Brookings Metropolitan Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trende, Sean. 2013. The GOP and hispanics: What the future holds. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/06/28/the_gop_and_hispanics_what_the_future_holds_119011.html. Zugegriffen am 25.11.2019.

  • U.S. Census. 2016. Electorate profiles: Selected characteristics of the citizen, 18 and older population. Washington, DC. 28. Oktober.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census. 2017. Share of reported voters by race and hispanic origin: 1980–2016. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/newsroom/press-kits/2017/voting-and-registration/figure03.png. Zugegriffen am 15.04.2019.

  • U.S. Census. 2018. Population estimates, July 1, 2018. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045218. Zugegriffen am 15.04.2019.

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2010. Aliens removed or returned. Fiscal Years 1892 to 2010. Washington, DC. Januar 2011, Dezember 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasem, Ruth Ellen. 2012. Unauthorized aliens residing in the United States. Estimates since 1986. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasem, Ruth Ellen. 2013a. U.S. immigration policy. Chart book of key trends. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasem, Ruth Ellen. 2013b. Brief history of comprehensive immigration. Reform efforts in the 109th and 110th congresses to inform policy discussions in the 113th congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Deutschland

    Henriette Rytz

Authors
  1. Henriette Rytz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henriette Rytz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Christan Lammert

  2. Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

    Markus Siewert

  3. JFK Institut für Nordamerikastudien Abteilung Politik, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Boris Vormann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rytz, H. (2019). Die zwiegespaltene nation of immigrants. In: Lammert, C., Siewert, M., Vormann, B. (eds) Handbuch Politik USA. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_26-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_26-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04125-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04125-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Die zwiegespaltene „nation of immigrants“: Einwanderungspolitik zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung
    Published:
    03 August 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_26-3

  2. Die zwiegespaltene nation of immigrants
    Published:
    12 November 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_26-2

  3. Original

    Die Einwanderungspolitik der USA zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung
    Published:
    19 August 2014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_26-1

Search

Navigation