Handbuch Unternehmensorganisation pp 1-12 | Cite as
Strategische Zusammenarbeit mit industriellen Zulieferern
Living reference work entry
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
Zusammenfassung
Um ihre Organisation konkurrenzfähiger zu machen, schenken Unternehmer strategischen Allianzen immer mehr Beachtung. Damit sie dieses Ziel durch das Eingehen von Allianzen auch erreichen und mit dieser strategischen Zusammenarbeit richtig umgehen, sollten Unternehmer die Vor- und Nachteile strategischer Allianzen sowie ihre internen Kapazitäten kennen. Diese Kenntnis ist besonders wichtig für industrielle Zulieferer in der ersten Linie, die den Netzwerkansatz nutzen müssen, um den wachsenden Anforderungen an die Produktionskette standhalten zu können.
Schlüsselwörter
Strategischer Allianzen Zusammenarbeit Industrielle Zulieferer Systemintegratoren Produktionskette NetzwerkansatzLiteratur
- 1.Baum, J.A.C., Cowan, R., Jonard, N.: Network-independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation networks. Manag. Sci. 56(11), 2094–2110 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V., Lokshin, B.: Persistence of, and interrelation between, horizontal and vertical technology alliances. J. Manag. Stud. 38(6), 1812–1834 (2012)Google Scholar
- 3.Day, M., Magnan, G.M., Moeller, M.M.: Evaluating the bases of supplier segmentation: A review and taxonomy. Ind. Mark. Manag. 39(4), 625–639 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.De Man, A.-P.: Alliances: An Executive Guide to Designing Successful Strategic Partnerships. Wiley Publishers, Chichester (2014)Google Scholar
- 5.Moerman, P.A., Commandeur, H.R., Langerak, F.: Strategische Zusammenarbeit mit Industriellen Zulieferern. In: Bullinger, H.J., Spath, D., Warnecke, H.J., Westkämper, E. (Hrsg.) Handbuch Unternehmensorganisation: Strategien, Planung, Umsetzung, 3. Aufl., S. 373–383. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Smets, L.P.M., van Oorschot, K.E., Langerak, F.: Don’t trust trust: a dynamic approach to controlling supplier involvement in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 30(6), 1145–1158 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Verwaal, E., Commandeur, H., Verbeke, W.: Value creation and value claiming in strategic outsourcing decisions: a resource contingency perspective. J. Manag. 35(2), 420–444 (2009)Google Scholar
- 8.Vesalainen, J., Kohtamaki, M.: Toward a typological view of buyer-supplier relationships: challenging the unidimensional relationship continuum. Ind. Mark. Manag. 49(8), 105–115 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Wildemann, H.: Entwicklungspartnerschaften in der Automobil- und Zulieferindustrie. TWC-Verlag, München (2004)Google Scholar
- 10.Williamson, O.E.: Transaction cost economics: the natural progression. Am. Econ. Rev. 100(3), 673–690 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiterführende Literatur
- Azadegan, A., Dooley, K.J.: Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: an empirical assessment. J. Oper. Manag. 28(6), 488–505 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bastl, M., Johnson, M., Choi, T.Y.: Who’s seeking whom? Coalition behavior of a weaker player in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Supply Chain Manag. 49(1), 8–28 (2013). Learn moreCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carey, S., Lawson, B., Krause, D.R.: Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Oper. Manag. 29(4), 277–288 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clauss, T.: The influence of the type of relationship on the generation of innovations in buyer-supplier collaborations. Creativity Innovat. Manag. 21(4), 388–411 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Daugherty, P.: Review of logistics and supply chain relationship literature and suggested research agenda. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 41(1), 16–31 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dekker, H.C., Van den Abbeele, A.: Organizational learning and interfirm control: The effects of partner search and prior exchange experiences. Organ. Sci. 21(6), 1233–1250 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Delbufalo, E.: Subjective trust and perceived risk influences on exchange performance in supplier-manufacturer relationships. Scand. J. Manag. 31(1), 84–101 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ding, L., Mahbubani, J.: The two-stage decision model of vertical integration. Manag. Decis. 51(1/2), 306–320 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dyer, J.H., Singh, H., Kale, P.: Splitting the pie: rent distribution in alliances and networks. Manag. Decis. Econ. 29(2-3), 137–148 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elfenbein, D.W., Zenger, T.R.: what is a relationship worth? Repeated exchange and the development and deployment of relational capital. Organ. Sci. 25(1), 222–244 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hagedoorn, J., Letterie, W., Palm, F.: The information value of R&D alliances: the preference for local or distant ties. Strat. Organ. 9(4), 283–309 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ho, H., Ganesan, S.: Does knowledge base compatibility help or hurt knowledge sharing between suppliers in coopetition? The role of customer participation. J. Mar. 77(6), 91–107 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jean, R.-J.B., Sinkovics, R.R., Hiebaum, T.P.: The effects of supplier involvement and knowledge protection on product innovation in customer-supplier relationships: a study of global automotive suppliers in China. J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 31(1), 98–113 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim, H., Hur, D., Schoenherr, T.: when buyer-driven knowledge transfer activities really work: a motivation-opportunity-ability perspective. J. Supply Chain Manag. 51(3), 33–60 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lui, S.S., Ngo, H.-y.: Drivers and outcomes of long-term orientation in cooperative relationships. Br. J. Manag. 23(1), 80–95 (2012)Google Scholar
- Luo, Y.: How important are shared perceptions of procedural justice in cooperative alliances? Acad. Manage. J. 48(4), 695–709 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mahapatra, S.K., Narasimhan, R., Barbieri, P.: Strategic interdependence, governance effectiveness and supplier performance: a dyadic case study investigation and theory development. J. Oper. Manag. 28(6), 537–552 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mahmood, I.P., Zhu, H., Zajac, E.J.: Where can capabilities come from? Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strat. Manag. J. 32(8), 820–848 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mesquita, L.F., Anand, J., Brush, T.H.: Comparing the resource-based and relational views: knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances. Strat. Manag. J. 29(9), 914–941 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Noordhoff, C.S., Kyriakopoulos, K., Moorman, C., et al.: The bright side and dark side of embedded ties in business-to-business innovation. J. Mar. Sci. 75(5), 34–52 (2011)Google Scholar
- Poppo, L., Zhou, K.Z.: Managing contracts for fairness in buyer-supplier exchanges. Strat. Manag. J. 35(10), 1508–1527 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rindfleisch, A.: Organizational trust and interfirm cooperation: an examination of horizontal versus vertical alliances. Mark. Lett. 11(1), 81–95 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rothaermel, F.T., Boeker, W.: Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strat. Manag. J. 29(1), 47–77 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasan, R., Brush, T.H.: Supplier performance in vertical alliances: the effects of self-enforcing agreements and enforceable contracts. Organ. Sci. 17(4), 436–452 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wagner, S.M.: Supplier traits for better customer firm innovation performance. Ind. Mark. Manag. 39(7), 1139–1149 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016