Skip to main content

Construction grammar and lexicography

Abstract

Construction grammar is an approach to grammatical analysis and representation that has attracted considerable attention since the seminal works were published around thirty years ago (Fillmore et al. 1988; Lakoff 1987). Since that time, a number of variants of construction grammar have been developed by different scholars. Nevertheless, there is a common core of principles that characterizes virtually all types of construction grammars (Croft and Cruse 2004, chapters 9–10). Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001) was developed to situate construction grammar in a cross-linguistic perspective. Its primary hypothesis on the nature of grammatical categories has significant implications for lexicography but also holds out the prospect of making lexicographic practice in different languages more comparable.

Keywords

  • Radical Construction Grammar
  • Lexicographic Practice
  • Argument Structure Constructions
  • Word Class
  • Inflectional Constructions

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study into the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language, 64, 501–538.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. (1979). On the failure of generative grammar. Language, 55, 859–885.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lakota Language Consortium. (2008). New Lakota dictionary. Bloomington: Lakhota Language Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljeblad, S., Fowler, C. S., & Powell, G. (2011). Northern Paiute-Bannock dictionary. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, A. (2011). A grammar and dictionary of Zaiwa, vol. 2: dictionary and texts. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. B., & Mauldin, M. M. (2000). A dictionary of Creek/Muskogee. Omaha: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montler, T. (2012). Klallam dictionary. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, D. R., & Pratt, L. N. (2008). A dictionary of Skiri Pawnee. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stassen, L. (1997). Intransitive predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolkonsky, C., & Poltoratzky, M. (1961). Handbook of Russian roots. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, H. (2003). Onondaga-English/English-Onondaga dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. W., & Morgan, W. Sr. (1987). The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary (revised edition). Albuquerque: The University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. W., & Morgan, W., Sr. (1992). Analytic lexicon of Navajo. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Croft .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this entry

Cite this entry

Croft, W., Sutton, L. (2017). Construction grammar and lexicography. In: Hanks, P., de Schryver, GM. (eds) International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4_99-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4_99-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45369-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45369-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences