Skip to main content

Instructional Design Principles for Mobile Learning

  • 570 Accesses

Abstract

With the exponential development of mobile devices and technologies, mobile learning has been in great use in higher education. This chapter will discuss the opportunities and challenges of mobile learning in higher education and review existing literature related to the design principles and frameworks for m-learning. Finally, this chapter will recommend comprehensive design principles with examples of mobile apps that closely applied the design principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Ally, Mohamed, and Josep Prieto-Blázquez. 2014. What is the future of mobile learning in education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 11 (1): 142–151. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i1.2033.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Awadhiya, Ashish Kumar, and Anshu Miglani. 2016. Mobile learning: Challenges for teachers of Indian open universities. Journal of Learning for Development 3 (2): 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek, Eun-Ok, and Thomas M. Schwen. 2006. The culture of teachers vs. a necessary culture for an online community. Performance Improvement Quarterly 19 (2): 51–68.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, Eun-Ok, Kursat Cagiltay, Elizabeth Boling, and Theodore W. Frick. 2008. User-centered design and development. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, ed. J. Michael Spector, M. David Merrill, Jeroen van Merriënboer, and Marcy P. Driscoll, 3rd ed., 659–670. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, Courtney K., Alexis Lauricella, and Ellen Wartella. 2014. Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education 77: 82–90.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, Jongpil, Sangno Lee, Steven M. Crooks, and Jaeki Song. 2012. An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education 59 (3): 1054–1064.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chetwynd, Andrew. 2017. VLE based analysis and design. The Plymouth Student Scientist 10 (1): 102–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Trudy K. 2008. The role of the theory in instructional design: Some views of an ID practitioner. Performance Improvement 47 (4): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.199.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Walter, Lou Carey, and James O. Carey. 2015. The systematic design of instruction. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, Andrea. 2012. Mobile instructional design principles for adult learners. Master’s thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/12253/Dillard2012.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.

  • Dlab, Martina Holenko, Natasa Hoic-Bozic, and Ivica Boticki. 2017. A design-based approach to developing a mobile learning system. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 11 (10): 2320–2325. scholar.waset.org/1307-6892/10008028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, Marcy P. 2012. Psychological foundations of instructional design. In Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, ed. Robert A. Reiser and John V. Dempsey, 4th ed., 52–60. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Laurel Evelyn, Andrew Litchfield, Ryszard Raban, and Jonathan Tyler. 2009. Interactive classroom mLearning and the experiential transactions between students and lecturer. In Proceeding of the 26th annual Ascilite international conference, Auckland (pp. 233–242). http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/auckland09/procs/dyson.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.

  • El-Hussein, Mohamed Osman M., and Johannes C. Cronje. 2010. Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society 13 (3): 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Tanya. 2011. Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 12 (2): 143–156. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.965.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, Peggy A., and Timothy J. Newby. 2013. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly 26 (2): 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, Peggy A., Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Olgun Sadik, Emine Sendurur, and Polat Sendurur. 2012. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education 59 (2): 423–435.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Filho, Nemésio, and Ellen Barbosa. 2013. A requirements catalog for mobile learning environments. In Proceedings of the 28th annual ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC 2013), Coimbra, 1266–1271. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480362.2480599.

  • Fozdar, Bharat Inder, and Lalita S. Kumar. 2007. Mobile learning and student retention. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 8 (2): 1–18.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. Randy. 2009. Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11 (1): 61–72. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=EJ842688&id=EJ842688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gikas, Joanne, and Michael M. Grant. 2013. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education 19: 18–26.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, Masoud, Masound Azizinezhad, Vahid Najafi, and Ali Jamali Nesari. 2011. What is mobile learning? Challenges and capabilities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 30: 2477–2481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.483.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, Anthony, Jan Herrington, and Jessica Mantei. 2009. Design principles for mobile learning. In New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education, ed. Jan Herrington, Anthony Herrington, Jessica Mantei, Ian Olney, and Brian Ferry, 129–138. Wollongong: University of Wollongong. http://ro.uow.edu.au/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockly, Nicky. 2013. Mobile learning. ELT Journal 67 (1): 80–84. https://doi-org.libproxy.lib.csusb.edu/10.1093/elt/ccs064.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Yu-Chang, and Yu-Hui Ching. 2015. A review of models and frameworks for designing mobile learning experiences and environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 41 (3): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2V616.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jalil, Abdurrahman, Martin Beer, and Paul Crowther. 2015. Pedagogical requirements for mobile learning: A review on MOBIlearn task model. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2015 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.ap.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, Matthew, and Punya Mishra. 2008. Introducing TPCK. In Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators, ed. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology, 3–29. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, Agnes, Mike Sharples, Marcelo Milrad, Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sánchez, and Giasemi Vavoula. 2009. Innovation in mobile learning: A European perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 1 (1): 13–35.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laine, Teemu H., Carolina A. Sedano, Mike Joy, and Erkki Sutinen. 2010. Critical factors for technology integration in game-based pervasive learning spaces. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 3 (4): 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.16.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Ka Po, Dickson K.W. Chiu, Kevin K.W. Ho, Patrick Lo, and Eric W.K. See-To. 2017. Educational usage of mobile devices: Differences between postgraduate and undergraduate students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 43 (3): 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.03.004.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lauricella, Alexis, Blackwell, Courtney, and Wartella, Ellen. 2017. The “new” technology environment: The role of content and context on learning and development from mobile media. In Media Exposure During Infancy and Early Childhood: The Effects of Content and Context on Learning and Development, eds. Rachel Barr and Deborah N. Linebarger, 1–23. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levene, Jessica, and Holli Seabury. 2015. Evaluation of mobile learning: Current research and implications for instructional designers. TechTrends 59 (6): 46–52.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, Chee-Kit, Lung-Hsiang Wong, Hyo-Jeong So, Peter Seow, Yancy Toh, Wenli Chen, Baohui Zhang, Cathie Norris, and Elliot Soloway. 2009. Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education 53 (4): 1120–1132.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Richard E. 2003. The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction 13: 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. 2006. Ten research-based principles of multimedia learning. In Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice, ed. Harold F. O’Neil and Ray S. Perez, 371–390. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkhoff, Thomas, and Magnus Lars Bengtsson. 2012. Engaging students in higher education through mobile learning: Lessons learnt in a Chinese entrepreneurship course. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 11 (3): 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-011-9123-8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, Punya, and Matthew Koehler. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108 (6): 1017–1054.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Motiwalla, Luvai F. 2007. Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education 49 (3): 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.011.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Panda, Santosh, and Sanjaya Mishra. 2007. E-learning in a mega open university: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International 44 (4): 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980701680854.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Young C. 2008. Study of m-Learning system for middle school. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, Singapore, 1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2008.4738075.

  • Parsons, David, and Kathryn MacCallum. 2017. A learning theory rubric for evaluating mobile learning activities. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design 7 (4): 24–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2017100102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, David, Hokyoung Ryu, and Mark Cranshaw. 2006. A study of design requirements for mobile learning environments. In Sixth international conference on advanced learning technologies, 2006, IEEE, Kerkrade, 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652376.

  • Peters, Kristine. 2007. m-Learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 8 (2): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.350.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Ruimin, Minjuan Wang, Wanping Gao, Daniel Novak, and Lin Tang. 2009. Mobile learning in a large blended computer science classroom: System function, pedagogies, and their impact on learning. IEEE Transactions on Education 52 (4): 538–546. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2008.930794.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Yanjie, and Siu Cheung Kong. 2017. Affordances and constraints of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for learning and teaching in higher education: Teachers’ perspectives. The Internet and Higher Education 32: 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.004.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Josie, Mike Sharples, Claire O’Malley, Giasemi Vavoula, and Jenny Waycott. 2006. Towards a task model for mobile learning: A dialectical approach. International Journal of Learning Technology 2 (2–3): 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2006.010616.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The Statistics Portal. 2017. https://www.statista.com. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.

  • Wang, Minjuan, and Ruimin Shen. 2012. Message design for mobile learning: Learning theories, human cognition and design principles. British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (4): 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01214.x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Minjuan, Ruimin Shen, Daniel Novak, and Xiaoyan Pan. 2009. The impact of mobile learning on students’ learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (4): 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00846.x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun-Ok Baek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Baek, EO., Guo, Q. (2019). Instructional Design Principles for Mobile Learning. In: Zhang, Y., Cristol, D. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_111-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_111-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences