Encyclopedia of Membranes

Living Edition
| Editors: Enrico Drioli, Lidietta Giorno

Aerobic Membrane Bioreactor

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_7-1
  • 262 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

Aerobic membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are one of the leading technologies to achieve sustainability in wastewater treatment through reuse, decentralization, and low energy consumption (Fane and Fane 2005; Fawehinmi et al. 2005). In aerobic MBRs, aerated activated sludge is coupled with membrane process to remove dissolved contaminants (carbon and ammonia) and separate solids from the treated municipal or industrial wastewater. Carbon is removed by microorganisms that metabolize the carbon in the presence of dissolved oxygen for microbial growth and respiration (organic carbon reduced to carbon dioxide). Ammonia is removed through ammonia oxidation (nitrification). Nitrification is a microbially mitigated reduction process that occurs in an aquatic environment that contains moderate to high concentrations of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Achilli A, Marchand EA, Childress AE (2011) A performance evaluation of three membrane bioreactor systems: aerobic, anaerobic, and attached-growth. Water Sci Technol 63:2999–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouhabila EH, Ben-Aim R, Buisson H (2001) Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors. Sep Purif Technol 22–23:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fane AG, Fane SA (2005) The role of membrane technology in sustainable decentralized wastewater systems. Water Sci Technol 51(10):317–325Google Scholar
  4. Fawehinmi F, Lens P, Stephenson T, Rogalla F, Jefferson B (2005) The influence of operating conditions on extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), soluble microbial products (SMP) and bio-fouling in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. In: IWA specialized conference on water environmentGoogle Scholar
  5. Hong SP, Bae TH, Tak TM, Hong S, Randall A (2002) Fouling control in activated sludge submerged hollow fiber membrane bioreactors. Desalination 143:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Judd S (2005) Fouling control in submerged membrane bioreactors. Water Sci Technol 51(6–7):27–34Google Scholar
  7. Judd S (2006) The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors in water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Kang Y-T, Cho Y-H, Chung E-H (2007) Development of the wastewater reclamation and reusing system with a submerged membrane bioreactor combined bio-filtration. Desalination 202:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawrence P, Adham S, Barro L (2002) Ensuring water re-use projects succeed – institutional and technical issues for treated wastewater re-use. Desalination 152:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Le-Clech P, Fane A, Leslie G, Childress A (2005) MBR focus: the operators’ perspective. Filtr Sep 42(5):20–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TAG (2006) Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 284:17–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meng FG, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang FL (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43(6):1489–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Psoch C, Schiewer S (2005) Critical flux aspect of air sparging and backflushing on membrane bioreactors. Desalination 175:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Psoch C, Schiewer S (2006) Resistance analysis for enhanced wastewater membrane filtration. J Membr Sci 280:284–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith PJ, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH, Ben-Aim R, Nguyen H (2005) Design of a generic control system for optimising back flush durations in a submerged membrane hybrid reactor. J Membr Sci 255:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stephenson T, Judd S, Jefferson B, Brindle K (2000) Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang ZW, Wu ZC (2009) A review of membrane fouling in MBRs: characteristics and role of sludge cake formed on membrane surfaces. Sep Sci Technol 44(15):3571–3596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang W, Cicek N, Ilg J (2006) State of the art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in north America. J Membr Sci 270:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Resources Engineering DepartmentHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA