Skip to main content

The Role of Climate Services in Adapting to Climate Variability and Change

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation

Abstract

Adaptation to climate change has risen up the political agenda in recent years, as the realization that we are committed to at least some level of climate change over the next few decades has been acknowledged. It is also the case that a range of different economic sectors, both public and private, increasingly recognize the need for, and importance of, adapting to climate change and the need to manage their climate risks. Adaptation to climate change is a complex issue, and successful adaptation will depend on the intelligent use and combination of a range of different factors, including scientific, organizational, social, and governance structures. This chapter focuses on the role that climate services can play in helping organizations and societies adapt to climate change and variability. It provides an overview of the key components of climate services and details the essential functions which climate services must develop, in order to fully play their role in supporting adaptation decisions and thus, helping society adapt to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen MA, Mitchell JFB, Stott PA (2013) Test of a decadal climate forecast. Nat Geosci 6:243–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barron EJ et al (2001) A climate services vision: first steps toward the future. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC. ISBN 0-309-07633-1, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer GJ (2009) Changes in interannual variability and decadal potential predictability under global warming. J Clim 22:3098–3109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks MS (2013) Accelerating innovation in climate services. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00087.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer P et al. (2014) Adaptation as climate risk management, Chapter 28 in Leal W Climate Change Adaptation Manual

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane MA (2010) Climate science: decadal predictions in demand. Nat Geosci 3:231–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter TR et al (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 134–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW et al (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8086–8091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DAS (2008) German strategy for adaptation to climate change. http://www.bmu.de/english/climate/downloads/doc/42841.php. Accessed 1 Dec 2010

  • Déqué M et al (2007) An intercomparison of regional climate simulations for Europe: assessing uncertainties in model projections. Clim Change 81:53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flato G, Marotzke J, Abiodun B, Braconnot P, Chou SC, Collins W, Cox P, Driouech F, Emori S, Eyring V, Forest C, Gleckler P, Guilyardi E, Jakob C, Kattsov V, Reason C, Rummukainen M (2013) Evaluation of climate models. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM (2010) Modelling impacts and adaptation in integrated assessment models. WIRE Clim Change 1:288–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Glecklers PJ, Taylor KE, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res 113, D06104. doi:10.1029/2007JD008972

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard L et al. (2010) Providing seasonal-to-interannual climate information for risk management and decision making. Proc Env Sci 1:81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines K, Hermanson L, Liu C, Putt D, Sutton R, Iwi A, Smith D (2009) Decadal climate prediction (project GCEP). Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 367:925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1095–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermanson L, Sutton RT (2010) Case studies in interannual to decadal climate predictability. Clim Dyn 35:1169–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell JW (2008) Decadal climate prediction: challenges and opportunities. J Phys conf series 125, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/125/1/012018

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob D et al (2007) An inter-comparison of regional climate models for Europe: model performance in present day climate. Clim Change 81:31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RN, Mearns LO (2005) Assessing future climate risks. In: Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Burton I, Malone E, Huq S (eds) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, pp 91–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenlyside NS, Ba J (2010) Prospects for decadal climate prediction. WIREs Clim Change 1:627–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenlyside NS, Latif M, Jungclaus J, Kornblueh L, Roeckner E (2008) Advancing decadal-scale climate prediction in the North Atlantic sector. Nature 453:84–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirtman B, Power SB, Adedoyin JA, Boer GJ, Bojariu R, Camilloni I, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Fiore AM, Kimoto M, Meehl GA, Prather M, Sarr A, Schär C, Sutton R, van Oldenborgh GJ, Vecchi G, Wang HJ (2013) Near-term climate change: projections and predictability. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Furrer R, Tebaldi C, Cermak J, Meehl GA (2010) Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models. J Clim 23:2739–2758. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI3361.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal PN, Mitchell T, Aldunce P, Auld H, Mechler R, Miyan A, Romano LE, Zakaria S (2012) National systems for managing the risks from climate extremes and disasters. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, pp 339–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavers D, Luo L, Wood EF (2009) A multiple model assessment of seasonal climate forecast skill for applications. Geophys Res Lett 36, L23711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos MC, Rood RB (2010) Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice. WIRE Clim Change 1:670–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos MC et al (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Change 2(11):789–794. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert R, Nakicenovic N, Sarewitz D, Schlesinger M (2004) Characterizing climate-change uncertainties for decision makers. Clim Change 65:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastrandrea MD et al (2010) Bridging the gap: linking climate-impacts research with adaptation planning and management. Clim Change 100:87–101. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9827-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA et al (2009) Decadal prediction, can it be skilful? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1467–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Hu A, Tebaldi C (2010) Decadal prediction in the Pacific region. J Clim 23:2959–2973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinke H, Nelson R, Kokic P, Stone R, Selvaraju R, Baethgen W (2006) Actionable climate knowledge: from analysis to synthesis. Clim Res 33:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles EL et al (2006) An approach to designing a national climate service. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:19616–19623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM et al (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre C et al (2010) Addressing the complexity of the Earth system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1389–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2010) Assessment of intraseasonal to interannual climate prediction and predictability. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, ISBN 978-0-309-15183-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer TN, Anderson DLT (1994) The prospects for seasonal forecasting – a review paper. Quart J R Met Soc 120:755–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer TN et al (2004) Development of a European multimodel ensemble system for seasonal-to-interannual prediction (DEMETER). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:853–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer TN, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Weisheimer A, Rodwell MJ (2008) Toward seamless prediction, calibration of climate change projections using seasonal forecasts. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1549–1551

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) (2007) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon N, Bischhoff B (2011) The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat Clim Change 1:35–41. doi:10.1038/nclimate1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmann H, Jungclaus JH, Köhl A, Stammer D, Marottzke J (2009) Initializing decadal climate predictions with the GECCO oceanic synthesis: effects on the North Atlantic. J Clim 22:3926–3938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichler T, Kim J (2008) How well do coupled models simulate today’s climate? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89(3):303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell MJ, Doblas-Reyes FJ (2006) Medium-range, monthly and seasonal prediction for Europe and the use of forecast information. J Clim 19:6025–6046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell MJ, Palmer TN (2007) Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models. Quart J R Met Soc 133:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemmich D et al (2009) ARGO the challenge of continuing 10 years of progress. Oceanography 22(3):46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth M (2010) Economic and social benefits of climate information: assessing the cost of inaction. Proc Env Sci 1:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiermeier Q (2010) The real holes in climate science. Nature 463:284–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M et al (2010) An Earth-system prediction initiative for the twenty-first century. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1377–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla J (1998) Predictability in the midst of chaos: a scientific basis for climate forecasting. Science 282:728–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla J et al (2010) Toward a new generation of world climate research and computing facilities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1407–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC et al (2013) Managing risk with climate vulnerability science. Nat Clim Change 3:607–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale TN, Anderson DLT, Alves JOS, Balmaseda MA (1998) Global seasonal rainfall forecasts using a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Nature 392:370–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale TN et al (2010) Understanding and predicting seasonal-to-interannual climate variability – the producer perspective.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson J (2010) US prepares for climate burden, Nature, 465:535

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DM et al. (2007) Improved surface temperature prediction for the coming decade from a global climate model. Sci 317:796–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson J (2013) The forecast for 2018 is cloudy with record heat. Nature 499:139–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Troccoli A, Palmer TN (2007) Ensemble decadal predictions from analysed initial conditions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 365:2179–2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden P, Mitchell JFB (eds) (2009) ENSEMBLES: climate change and its impacts: summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen et al (2013) Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(21):8357–8362. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219441110

    Google Scholar 

  • Visbeck M (2008) From climate assessment to climate services. Nat Geosci 1:2–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver C et al (2013) Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks. WIRE Clim Change 4:39–60. doi:10.1002/wcc.202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisheimer A et al (2009) ENSEMBLES: a new multi-model ensemble for seasonal-to-annual predictions – skill and progress beyond DEMETER in forecasting tropical Pacific SSTs. Geophys Res Lett 36, L21711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Dessai S (2010) Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65(7):180–185. doi:10.1002/wea.543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby R, Harris I (2006) A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: low flow scenarios for the river Thames, UK. Water Resour Res 42, W02419. doi:10.1029/2005WR004065

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML (1997) Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Progr Phys Geogr 21:530–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Roger Wakimoto, Rick Anthes, and Mel Shapiro for providing helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript. The German Climate Service Center is funded by the Bundesministerium for Education and Research (BMBF), under contract number FZK: 01LK0903A. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the US National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Bowyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bowyer, P., Brasseur, G.P., Jacob, D. (2015). The Role of Climate Services in Adapting to Climate Variability and Change. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics