Advertisement

Adaptation as ClimateRisk Management: Methods and Approaches

  • Paul BowyerEmail author
  • Michaela Schaller
  • Steffen Bender
  • Daniela Jacob

Abstract

This chapter highlights the benefits of framing adaptation to climate change as an issue of climate risk management and describes a number of methods and approaches that may be applied in the process of developing adaptation strategies. A key consideration when developing adaptation strategies is to have a sound understanding of how a given system functions in response to changes in both climate and non-climate factors, and thus the need for a causal model which represents this understanding. There are a range of methods and tools that may be applied to assist with developing this system understanding in a climate risk assessment, and a number of these are described here. Moreover, given that adaptation planning is to a large degree about forward planning, all adaptation strategies will need to appropriately consider the implications of uncertainty on their likely effectiveness. This chapter provides a discussion of the ways in which adaptation strategies can be developed and decisions made when appraising different adaptation strategies. As such, it provides a basis upon which users can assess how they may approach adaptation as an issue of climate risk management and select and apply suitable methods. It provides a useful accompaniment to any practitioner or organization, as they proceed on their adaptation journey.

Keywords

Risk management Climate change Adaptation Climate information Impact assessment Adaptation assessment Robust decision making Uncertainty 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the work of the EU-funded FP6 integrated project ENSEMBLES (contract number 505539), from which Fig. 3 is reproduced.

References

  1. Adger WN et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  2. Bowyer, P et al (2014) The Role of Climate Services in Adapting to Climate Variability and Change, In this volumeGoogle Scholar
  3. CCSP (2009) Best practice approaches for characterizing, communicating, and incorporating scientific uncertainty in decision making. [Granger Morgan M (Lead author), Dowlatabadi H, Henrion M, Keith D, Lempert R, McBride S, Small M, Wilbanks T (Contributing authors)]. A report by the climate change science program and the subcommittee on global change research. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC, 96 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Challinor AJ et al (2009) Methods and resources for climate impacts research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:836–848. doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2403.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins M et al (2012) Quantifying future climate change. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1414Google Scholar
  6. Coumou D, Rahmstorf S (2012) A decade of weather extremes. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1452Google Scholar
  7. Dow K et al (2013) Limits to adaptation. Nat Clim Change 3:305–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fowler H et al (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fronzek S et al (2010) Applying probabilistic projections of climate change with impact models: a case study for sub-arctic palsa mires in Fennoscandia. Clim Change 99:515–534. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9679-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1095–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2007) Synthesis Report. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Climate Change 2007: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 104Google Scholar
  12. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, 582 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. ISO 31000 (2009) Risk management – principles and guidelines. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43170
  14. Jacob D et al (2013) EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Reg Environ Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2Google Scholar
  15. Jones RN (2001) An environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change impact assessments. Nat Hazard 23:197–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones RN, Preston BL (2011) Adaptation and risk management. WIREs Clim Change 2:296–308. doi:10.1002/wcc.97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kunreuther H et al (2013) Risk management and climate change. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1740Google Scholar
  18. Lempert RJ, Groves DG (2010) Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77:960–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lempert R et al (2004) Characterizing climate-change uncertainties for decision-makers. Clim Change 65:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lempert RJ et al (2006) A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manag Sci 52(4):514–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lizumi T et al (2013) Prediction of seasonal climate-induced variations in global food production. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1945Google Scholar
  22. Malone EL, Engle NL (2011) Evaluating regional vulnerability to climate change: purposes and methods. WIREs Clim Change 2:462–474. doi:10.1002/wcc.116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McDaniels T et al (2012) Using expert judgments to explore robust alternatives for forest management under climate change. Risk Anal 32(12):2098–2112. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01822.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGuffie K, Henderson-Sellers A (2005) A Climate Modelling Primer, Third Edition. Wiley, pp 296Google Scholar
  25. Meehl GA et al (2009) Decadal prediction, can it be skilful? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1467–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moser SC, Boykoff MT (2013) Successful adaptation to climate change linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  27. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:22026–22031, http://www.pnas.org/content/107/51/22026
  28. Moss R et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756. doi:10.1038/nature08823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakićenović N et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 600 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. National Research Council (2010) Informing an effective response to climate change, America’s climate choices: panel on informing effective decisions and actions related to climate change. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Neill BC et al (2013) A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2Google Scholar
  32. Prudhomme C et al (2010) Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: application to flood risk. J Hydrol 390:198–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahmstorf S, Coumou D (2011) Increase of extreme events in a warming world. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(44):17905–17909, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1101766108
  34. Reed M et al (2013) Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J Environ Manag 128:345–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rounsevell MDA, Metzger MJ (2010) Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment. WIREs Clim Change 1:606–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saltelli A et al (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Wiley, Chichester, 494 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Sexton DMH et al (2012) Multivariate probabilistic projections using imperfect climate models part I: outline of methodology. Clim Dyn 38(11–12):2513–2542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stainforth DA et al (2007) Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:2145–2161. doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tollefson J (2013) The forecast for 2018 is cloudy with record heat. Nature 499:139–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Linden P, Mitchell JFB (2009) ENSEMBLES: Climate Change and its Impacts: Summary of Research and Results from the ENSEMBLES Project (Met Office Hadley Centre), Exeter, UKGoogle Scholar
  41. van Vliet M et al (2012) Vulnerability of US and European electricity supply to climate change, Nature Climate Change, 2, 676–681, doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Vuuren D et al (2012) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-zGoogle Scholar
  43. Weaver C et al (2013) Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks. WIREs Clim Change 4:39–60. doi:10.1002/wcc.202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Willows R, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP technical report. UKCIP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Yuen E et al (2013) Climate change vulnerability assessments as catalysts for social learning: four case studies in south-eastern Australia. Mitig Adapt Strat Global Change 18:567–590. doi:10.1007/s11027-012-9376-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Bowyer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michaela Schaller
    • 1
  • Steffen Bender
    • 1
  • Daniela Jacob
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Climate Service CenterChilehaus – Eingang BHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Climate Service CenterChilehausHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Max Planck Institute for MeteorologyHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations