Advertisement

Market Areas and Competing Firms: History in Perspective

  • Folke SnickarsEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Location theory has traditionally been based on equilibrium concepts. Dynamics have been introduced mainly to ascertain whether there are paths leading to the equilibrium states. The modeling of dynamics has been very simple yet involving both locational changes and price changes. Notions of market areas and competition between firms have been at the core of location analysis. Although the classical location theory was developed in a regional context, the models have found a number of recent applications in urban analysis where interdependencies and dynamics are central elements. The theoretical contributions of Hotelling, Hoover, and Palander form cornerstones for the discussion in the current chapter. In this chapter, we will mainly dwell in the Hotelling tradition and use the theories of Hoover and Palander as introductory and complementary inputs. The chapter presents a series of behavioral models in the spirit of the classical Hotelling location game involving the spatial location of suppliers (sellers) and consumers (customers) in an urban context. The models have been established within a cellular automata framework. The location models studied assume fixed prices. The location of sellers is determined by the relative accessibility to customers and the competition between sellers for customers. Using the techniques of cellular automata, a set of simulations will be performed to discuss equilibrium states of customer-seller systems. The discussion will serve to illustrate some elements of location theory under different levels of complexity.

Keywords

Market share Cellular automaton Location theory Urban system Relative accessibility 

References

  1. Anas A (1987) Modelling in urban and regional economics. Harwood Academic, ChurGoogle Scholar
  2. Batty M (2008) Fifty years of urban modelling: macro statics to micro dynamics. In: Albeverio S, Andrey D, Giordano P, Vancheri A (eds) The dynamics of complex urban systems: an interdisciplinary approach. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  3. d’Aspremont C, Gabszewicz J, Thisse J (1979) On hotelling’s stability of competition. Econometrica 47(5):1145–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dasgupta P, Maskin E (1986a) The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games I: theory. Rev Econ Stud 51(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dasgupta P, Maskin E (1986b) The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games II: applications. Rev Econ Stud 51(1):27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Downs A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Eaton BC, Lipsey R (1975) The principles of minimum differentiation reconsidered: some new developments in the theory of spatial competition. Rev Econ Stud 42(1):27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (1999) The spatial economy: cities, religions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabszewicz J, Thisse J, Fujita M, Schweizer U (1986) Location theory. Harwood, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Heffley D (1972) The quadratic assignment problem: a note. Econometrica 40(6):1155–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoover EM (1938) Location theory and the shoe and leather industry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoover EM (1948) The location of economic activity. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hotelling H (1929) Stability of competition. Econ J 39(153):41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koopmans TC, Beckmann M (1957) Assignment problems and the location of economic activities. Econometrica 25(1):53–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leydersdorff L (2002) The complex dynamics of technological innovation: a comparison of models using cellular automata. Syst Res Behav Sci 19(6):563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Y (2009) Modelling urban development with geographical information systems and cellular automata. Taylor and Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  17. Nickel E, Puerto J (2005) Location theory: a unified approach. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  18. Palander T (1935) Beiträge zur standortstheorie. Almqvist & Wiksell, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  19. Puu T (2003) Mathematical location and land use theory: an introduction. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rasmusen E (1989) Games and information: an introduction to game theory. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Roy GG, Snickars F (1996) City life: a study of cellular automata in urban dynamics. In: Fischer M, Scholten H, Unwin D (eds) Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS. Unwin and Hyman, London, pp 213–228Google Scholar
  22. Roy GG, Snickars F (1998) An interactive computer system for land-use transport interaction. In: Lundqvist L, Mattsson L-G, Kim TJ (eds) Network infrastructure and the urban environment: advances in spatial systems modelling. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 350–370Google Scholar
  23. Roy GG, Snickars F, Zaitseva G (2000) Simulation modelling of location choices in urban systems. In: Fotheringham AS, Wegener M (eds) Spatial models and GIS: new potentials and new models. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 185–201Google Scholar
  24. Semboloni F (2000) The growth of an urban cluster into a dynamic self-modifying spatial pattern. Environ Plan B Plan Design 27(4):549–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simon L (1987) Games with discontinuous payoffs. Rev Econ Stud 54(4):569–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Snickars F (1978) Convexity and duality properties of a quadratic intraregional location model. Reg Sci Urban Econ 7(4):5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thisse JF, Button K, Nijkamp P (1996) Modern classics in regional science: location theory. Edward Elgar, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Wegener M (2004) Overview of land-use transport models. In: Hensher DA, Button K (eds) Transport geography and spatial systems, handbook 5 of the handbook in transport. Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Kidlington, pp 127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. White R, Engelen G (1993) Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environ Plan 25(8):1175–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. White R, Engelen G (1997) Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modelling. Environ Plan B Plan Design 24(2):235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban Planning and the EnvironmentKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations