Abstract
Spatial interaction or gravity models have been used in regional science to model flows that take many forms, for example, population migration, commodity flows, traffic flows, and knowledge flows, all of which reflect movements between origin and destination regions. This chapter focuses on spatial autoregressive extensions to the conventional least-squares gravity models that relax the assumption of independence between flows. These models, proposed by LeSage and Pace (J Reg Sci 48(5):941–967, 2008; Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor-Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009), define spatial dependence in this type of setting to mean that larger observed flows from an origin region A to a destination region Z are accompanied by (i) larger flows from regions nearby the origin A to the destination Z, say regions B and C that are neighbors to region A, which they label origin dependence; (ii) larger flows from the origin region A to regions neighboring the destination region Z, say regions X and Y, which they label destination dependence; and (iii) larger flows from regions that are neighbors to the origin (B and C) to regions that are neighbors to the destination (X and Y), which they label origin-destination dependence. Spatial spillovers in these models can take the form of spillovers to both regions/observations neighboring the origin or destination in the dyadic relationships that characterize origin-destination flows as well as network effects that impact all other regions in the network. We set forth a simulation approach for these models that can be used to produce scalar expressions for the various types of spillover impacts that arise from changes in the explanatory variables of the model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Behrens K, Ertur C, Koch W (2012) “Dual” gravity: using spatial econometrics to control for multilateral resistance. J Appl Econ 27(5):773–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1231
Bolduc D, Laferriere R, Santarossa G (1992) Spatial autoregressive error components in travel flow models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22(3):371–385
Curry L (1972) A spatial analysis of gravity flows. Reg Stud 6(2):131–147
Elhorst JP (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spat Econ Anal 5(1):9–28
Fischer MM (2002) Learning in neural spatial interaction models: a statistical perspective. J Geogr Syst 4(3):287–299
Fischer MM, Griffith DA (2008) Modeling spatial autocorrelation in spatial interaction data: an application to patent citation data in the European Union. J Reg Sci 48(5):969989
Fischer MM, Reismann M (2002) A methodology for neural spatial interaction modeling. Geogr Anal 34(2):207–228
Fischer MM, Scherngell T, Jansenberger E (2006) The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe evidence from a spatial interaction modelling perspective. Geogr Anal 38(3):288–309
Getis A (1991) Spatial interaction and spatial autocorrelation: a cross-product approach. Environ Plan A 23(9):1269–1277
Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: applications to Poisson models. Econometrica 52(3):701–720
Griffith D, Jones K (1980) Explorations into the relationships between spatial structure and spatial interaction. Environ Plan A 12(2):187–201
Lambert DM, Brown JP, Florax RJGM (2010) A two-step estimator for a spatial lag model of counts: theory, small sample performance and an application. Reg Sci Urban Econ 40(4): 241–252
Lee M, Pace RK (2005) Spatial distribution of retail sales. J Real Estate Finance Econ 31(1):53–69
LeSage JP, Fischer MM (2010) Spatial econometric modeling of origin-destination flows. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 409–433
LeSage JP, Llano C (2006) A spatial interaction model with spatially structured origin and destination effects. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=924603 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.924603. Accessed 17 Aug 2006
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2008) Spatial econometric modeling of origin-destination flows. J Reg Sci 48(5):941–967
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor-Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton
LeSage JP, Fischer MM, Scherngell T (2007) Knowledge spillovers across Europe, evidence from a Poisson spatial interaction model with spatial effects. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):93–421
Porojan A (2001) Trade flows and spatial effects: the gravity model revisited. Open Econ Rev 12(3):265–280
Ranjan R, Tobias JL (2007) Bayesian inference for the gravity model. J Appl Econ 22(4):817–838
Roy JR, Thill JC (2004) Spatial interaction modeling. Pap Reg Sci 83(1):339–361
Sen A, Smith TE (1995) Gravity models of spatial interaction behavior. Springer, Heidelberg
Smith TE (1975) A choice theory of spatial interaction. Reg Sci Urban Econ 5(2):137–176
Tiefelsdorf M (2003) Misspecifications in interaction model distance decay relations: a spatial structure effect. J Geogr Syst 5(1):25–50
Wilson AG (1967) A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transp Res 1(3):253–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Thomas-Agnan, C., LeSage, J.P. (2019). Spatial Econometric OD-Flow Models. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_87-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_87-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences